Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Malala but not Afia

Malala but not Afia

by Syed Atiq ul Hassan | Sydney
November 14, 2012

Today, November 11th, 2012, has been declared as the ‘Malala Day’ by UN Special Envoy for Global Education and former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. In the west, people are also recommending ‘Nobel Peace Prize’ for Malala Yousuf Zai.

Whether Malala deserves a Noble Peace Prize is under debate as thousands of people are calling on world leaders to support their appeal. Nevertheless, the attack on Malala was highly condemnable and responsively the people of Pakistan including the Pakistani media demonstrated remarkable support for Malala with unity, which was praiseworthy. As the attack on Malala was heavily condemned by United States and the Western Capitals, Pakistani government also found free space to use the attack on Malala as a tool to build support from Western Capitals.

The admiration and importance to Malala from the United States and United Kingdom is understandable as Malala serves as a symbol of the continuous fight for the freedom of education for girls in Pakistan. Nevertheless, it is creating an impression that the education to girls in Pakistan is banned. Otherwise, the fact of the matter is that except some tribal areas of Pakistan, Pakistani girls are given equal access to education as to boys by the government and private sectors serving in education. Girls are found in equal number of ratios, in schools, universities and colleges across Pakistan. Pakistani girls and women are found serving in almost in every profession and industry in Pakistan. In a large male dominated society, gender equality and equity is an issue faced by women traditionally across many generations across South Asia, and Pakistan over the years has strengthened its female workforce and has empowered women through education, and is making steady progress.

If all the admirations and sympathies for Malala are because she was attacked by Taliban brutally and threatened to death then what about Dr. Afia Siddiqui who has been sentenced to 86 years jail by United States? Dr. Afia Siddiqui is also a Pakistani married woman with children. She is a neuroscientist from the United States.

Dr. Siddiqui was not convicted for any terrorist-related activities or being associated with Al Qaida or the Taliban. She was arrested by United States on the charges of being a part of Al-Qaida network but in fact, she has been sentenced to jail for 86 years for attacking an US soldier in the Afghan province of Ghazni.

When the people of Pakistan, Pakistani media and the government of Pakistan have shown so much unity and solidarity for Malala; why all of this has not been shown for Dr. Aafia Siddiqui? Is it because Dr. Aafia Siddiqui has been in the custody of United States on the charges levelled by US agencies? Why isn’t the Pakistani media seen as united and as lauded as for Malala?

For those who are not yet familiar with Dr. Aafia Siddiqui was born on March 2, 1972 in Karachi. She studied in USA and became a neuroscientist. She left United States in 2002. She was arrested by a joint team of FBI and Pakistani security officials in Karachi in 2003. She was immediately shifted to Bagram (Afghanistan) in Kandahar. According to Dr. Afia’s family, one of her three children died when the child was thrown on the floor by an investigator during her detention.

Afia Siddiqui’s defense lawyers argued that their client had shot at the US officials in a panic and said the crime lacked any connection to terrorism. During the hearing, it was heard by the trial jury that Afia Siddiqui, the day after her arrest grabbed an M-4 rifle in her interrogation room and started shooting ‘death to America’.

On Nov 5, 2012; A US appeals court upheld the conviction and 86-year prison sentence of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui for shooting at FBI agents and soldiers after her arrest in Afghanistan. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York said a lower court judge had not erred in allowing Siddiqui, 40, to testify in her own defense at trial and in allowing certain evidence against her. Dr. Aafia Siddiqui was convicted of attempted murder, armed assault and other charges, in September 2010, by a New York federal jury, announced by district Judge Richard Berman.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Crisis In Greece

Greece, as the cradle of democracy, is getting no brownie points for actually practicing it. The decision by the Greek government to go back to the people for a mandate for the bailout terms being proposed by the Eurozone seems entirely appropriate. More>>

ALSO:

Stories Of Scoop: Alastair Thompson, Scoop Media & The Cost Of Free Journalism

How does a news organization that cares about authentic journalism and has a mission to effect “positive change” continue to operate in these times of derivative storytelling when advertising dollars are no longer determined by the quality of editorial content? More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Pope’s Encyclical On Climate Change

The spread of market mechanisms into every facet of life – as health, education and the environment get treated as mere commodities – has seen economic efficiency worshipped in its own right as a totem, and as a substitute for morality. The Laudato Si encyclical issued today by Pope Francis on climate change and the environment goes some away to restoring a sane balance. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Turns Sixteen: How Scoop's “Ethical Paywall” Model Has Changed Everything

As of this month, a broad range of professional organisations, including constitutional institutions, government agencies & departments, NGOs, Unions, CRIs, law firms, PR agencies, accountancy firms, media organisations, libraries and businesses - all of which make regular use of Scoop in their daily work and for professional research - have joined Scoop’s new “Ethical Paywall” copyright licensing scheme. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell:
On The Sepp Blatter Resignation

Any initial elation at Sepp Blatter’s resignation as the overlord of FIFA will be tempered by his declared intention to stay on until at least December and possibly March 2016, to enable his successor to be elected. Has FIFA got no existing succession plan that could kick in before this? More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The FIFA Scandal, And Similar Dirty Deal

With the US now investigating FIFA’s racketeering and money-laundering activities and the Swiss also looking at the bribes that went into the choice of Russia and Qatar as upcoming FIFA venues, the capos at FIFA are taking the fall for the boss of all bosses, Sepp Blatter - who has somehow been blissfully unaware of the dirty payoffs and extortion rackets conducted on his watch ... More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news