Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Gordon Campbell on the petrol price hike

Gordon Campbell on the petrol price hike

One can only imagine the outcry if a centre left government could manage to meet its goals as economic managers – in this case, to get the country back in surplus by 2014/2015 – only by suddenly raising the petrol tax and by keeping ACC levies at a punitive level even in the face of official recommendations that they be lowered. How the tax and spend addictions of socialists in government would be being decried! It would be being depicted as highway robbery, pure and simple. More taxes on ordinary folks to disguise the sickness within the government accounts. Because if this were a centre-left government, you can bet it would be being pointed out that boosting the petrol tax was not a sustainable path to prosperity, because it didn’t address the root causes of poor economic growth. Much tut-tutting would ensue about socialists needing to learn how to grow the cake.

At this dark hour, the editorial writers would also be noting sagely, how fortunate it was that prior centre-right governments had kept our government debt at manageably low levels, thus saving us from the worst consequences of socialist mismanagement. A few sterner types would be lecturing the government that this was all sideshow politicking in any case: because what say you sir, that a miserly $66 million surplus is an absolutely meaningless achievement? Meaning: the surplus/deficit would have to be a billion dollars either way before it had any noticeable economic impact. Verily, people would be being forced into paying higher petrol taxes and unnecessarily high ACC levies merely to make the government look good. Lipstick on a pig etc etc.

By now, it should be clear from this laboured intro that the actual culprit raising petrol taxes and maintaining ACC levies at their current level is in fact, the centre-right government of Mr. John Key. And the only reason New Zealand isn’t in worse strife with the rating agencies (such as Moody’s) is that the previous centre-left management team led by Michael Cullen wisely paid down government debt – at a time when spendthrifts such as John Key were chastising him for not dishing that (genuine, not engineered) surplus out in tax cuts. And how come yesterday’s half yearly fiscal update had made the petrol tax/ACC levy jiggery pokery a necessity in the first place? Because Treasury’s growth estimates six months ago in the Budget had been overly optimistic.

Logical, really. Why should we think this government can manage the economy without fiddling the books, when they can’t seem to manage anything else? In that sense, yesterday’s episode was a truly fitting end to the year. In almost every portfolio area you care to name, the roof is caving in. Education? On Hekia Parata’s watch, there have been successive disasters with respect to class sizes, the schools closures in Christchurch, the Novopay fiasco and her plan for a special girls’ school in Nelson now deemed illegal by the courts. In most other countries she would be facing two options: resign, or be sacked. Then there were the McCully reforms at MFAT, which have thrown one of our most competent departments into total disarray in pursuit of illusory cost savings. (Again, if a centre-left government had disabled the foreign affairs arm of government so comprehensively, the wretch responsible would have faced calls of treason, and been drummed out of office months ago.)

Moving right along…according to Steven Joyce, only the hippies and the Greens were stopping our oil and gas exploration bonanza from being realized. Yet by year’s end, the hard-headed pragmatists at Petrobras had handed back their East Cape exploration permits and similarly, Anadarko had postponed their exploration plans off the Taranaki coast. It wasn’t the hippies that stampeded them out. The cost/benefit exercises just didn’t stack up. Like the government as a whole, Joyce had over-promised and under-delivered.

Wait, there’s more. Judith Collins and the Bain compensation claim, Nick Smith and the policy and management problems at ACC, the privacy breaches at WINZ and Corrections, the futile involvement in Afghanistan, the failed promises to the Pike River families, the oft-delayed rebuild of Christchurch, the bungled asset sales programme, the Kim Dotcom fiasco and its related memory lapses …This year really has been a litany of incompetence. Leaving aside the ideological disagreements for a moment, one has to look hard for signs of basic managerial ability even on the things that the government professes to believe in. Just about the only controversial issue that is advancing on schedule is the welfare reform package. And that is in no small part due to the fact that David “Beneficiary on the Roof” Shearer and his Labour Party have been too terrified of the public response to seriously join battle with Paula Bennett on the subject.

The petrol tax hike though will be an interesting test of Key’s current “What, me worry?” style of governance. (It doesn’t bother him, so what’s your problem again?) The nine cents a litre petrol cost rise will be phased in over three years. That rise could well be forgotten by Christmas Day 2012. But it may not. Surely, it should be possible for the Greens (if not Labour) to turn this into the goof that keeps on giving. Because every time you fill up at the pump in future, you will be paying primarily to confirm a National Party promise to be competent economic managers. How ironic, as Alanis used to say. And you are to be reminded of this shonky deal every year, as the price goes up from three cents, to six cents to nine cents. All in order to create an utterly meaningless mini-surplus (if they’re lucky) and/or to finance a massive roading programme, much of which fails any rigorous cost/benefit analysis.

One last analogy. Yesterday’s petrol price hike is like taking out a loan to buy Christmas presents, and then making everyone else pay the subsequent bill, just because…at the time, you wanted to look like a good parent. That’s the Key approach to economic management, in a nutshell. Just don’t expect to see it condemned necessarily, in the NZ Herald, or on TVNZ.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Troubled Aftermath Of Scotland’s Independence Vote

A week can be a very long time in Scotland’s 300 year struggle for independence. The “No” vote last week that seemed to end the cause of Scottish independence for a generation, has turned out to have had an enormous fish hook attached, especially for the British Labour Party… More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The West’s Existential Crisis About What To Do With Putin, And The Islamic State

Say one thing for Russian President Vladimir Putin. At least he’s given NATO a purpose in life. Right now, that consists of being something that Barack Obama and David Cameron can hide behind, point at Putin, and say : “Go get him, tiger.” Just what NATO is supposed to do about Putin’s armed advance into eastern Ukraine is less than clear. But there is a lot of “steely determination” around in high places. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news