Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Safe drinking water - an unfinished agenda

Safe drinking water - an unfinished agenda

by Dr. Noeleen Heyzer
May 21, 2013

Without water there is no life. Clean drinking water and sanitation are basic human rights – essential to life and to all other rights. Lack of access to clean water and sanitation is a silent crisis that destroys livelihoods and claims more lives through illness than any war claims through guns.

The good news is that our combined efforts have made a difference. Between 1990 and 2010, more than 2 billion people around the world gained access to safe drinking water, which meant that we achieved that Millennium Development Goal (MDG) five years ahead of schedule.

But we have an unfinished agenda. By 2015, more than 600 million people will still lack safe drinking water, with people in disadvantaged communities three to four times less likely to have access. More than 1.7 billion people in Asia and the Pacific are also without modern sanitation, which means we are totally off track on the MDG target of halving the proportion of people living in these conditions. One hundred million people in South East Asia alone continue to practice open defecation.

Behind these numbers are human lives denied the opportunity to realize their potential and their human dignity. It is time to provide access to safe water and sanitation in all homes, all schools, all healthcare centers and in our public spaces.

Water security, better water management and sound water governance is needed to ensure there will be enough supply to meet the competing demands of industry, energy, agriculture and households. We must ensure the quality of drinking water, and reduce the time it takes for families, especially women, to collect the water needed for daily life.

Water security is about ensuring that every person has reliable access to enough safe water, at an affordable price, to lead a healthy, dignified and productive life.

Water security is also about sustaining, intergenerationally, the ecological systems that provide water, and protecting people against water-related disasters, especially in the context of climate change.

This is magnified by the fact that more than 90 per cent of the impacts of climate change are water-related, and that more than 50 per cent of our regional urban populations live in vulnerable coastal zones and flood plains.

The ESCAP study, “Building Resilience to Natural Disasters and Major Economic Crises”, called for better governance, combined with more sustainable solutions, which are better integrated with wider development strategies.

The outcome document of the Rio+20 summit recognized the importance of integrating water into all three pillars of sustainable development – economic, social, and environmental.

Sustainable solutions for water security must therefore address several issues simultaneously. I would like to briefly highlight five:

First, persistent inequalities and growing competition for water resources must be addressed through better public policies, greater investment in critical water infrastructure, and active participation by all stakeholders, especially women and youth, in water planning and decision-making. We cannot have high income households receiving hundreds of litres of water per day at low prices, when poor families in the same country have less access to water than is needed for even the most basic human needs.

Second, we must distinguish between green, blue & grey water resources, and do more to manage the wastewater of increasingly urban populations. Grey water reuse, along with simple water conservation technologies, and river rehabilitation makes water efficient practices affordable, and contributes towards a more sustainable economy.

Third, polluters must pay. Our public and private sectors must commit to treating municipal and industrial wastewater prior to discharge, and we must raise the cost to offenders of polluting rivers and water sources. Lack of regulation and poor enforcement has for too long allowed irresponsible companies to shift pollution from the developed to the developing world.

Fourth, governments at different levels have important roles to play in the formulation of integrated river basin management plans; to identify solutions in strengthening the management of transboundary water resources, and cross-border river basin ecosystems.

Fifth, we must recognize the important positive role that can be played by the private sector, which is responsible for up to 85% of global investment in new buildings, industry and critical infrastructure.

A few weeks ago, at the 69th Session of ESCAP Commission, the Royal Government of Thailand sponsored two water-related resolutions which were unanimously adopted by all member States.

These resolutions focused on enhancing knowledge-sharing and regional cooperation in integrated water resources management, emphasizing the vital role of water in sustainable development. They also addressed the challenges of building resilience to water-related disasters through regional cooperation.

ESCAP has therefore been mandated to coordinate with the other United Nations agencies to ensure effective use of technology and innovation in water management; to facilitate the sharing of regional and subregional best practices; to promote the wider integration of water management into the regional sustainable development agenda; and to provide and support a capacity development programme to build resilience in Asia and the Pacific to water-related risks and disasters.

Moving forward, safe and affordable water and sanitation must be at the heart of our regional, sub-regional and national efforts if we are to build a more inclusive, sustainable and resilient future for our people and our planet.

*************

Dr. Noeleen Heyzer is Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations and Executive Secretary of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Latest Allegations Against Helen Clark

According to former PM and UNDP leader current Helen Clark, the allegations leveled at her this week in a Foreign Policy magazine article by the prize-winning UN journalist Colum Lynch have been ‘totally fabricated’. Hmmm. That would be very, very surprising. More>>

Letter From The Editor: The State Of Scoop

Gordon Campbell: The PledgeMe campaign currently being run by the Scoop Foundation does provide a useful opportunity to update you on what gets done with your money. Further down the track, other documents will set out what we plan to do, resources permitting. For now, lets stick with the practical nuts and bolts. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Rise Of The Far Right (And Battle Bots)

In his victory speech at the Cannes film festival this week, the British film director Ken Loach [pictued] warned that the rise of far right parties in Europe was being fuelled by the economic policies of austerity, and manifested in a welfare bureaucracy that systematically denies assistance to those in most need. More>>

Julienne Molineaux: Stuff-Me - The Newspaper Gobble-Up

In New Zealand, concentration of newspaper ownership via mergers and acquisitions has a long pre-digital history. The trends of declining readership and fragmented audiences began before digital content, and mergers and acquisitions proceeded apace, enabled by weak legislative protections. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Foundation Membership Drive:

The Scoop Foundation: The best chance to create an independent guardian for public interest journalism in NZ

The Scoop Foundation is seeking public support to safeguard the future of public interest journalism in New Zealand. To ensure public access to comprehensive, free, timely news is maintained during this dark hour for journalism. And to provide every voice in NZ the opportunity to be heard in the national debate. More>>
PLEDGE NOW: Journalism: A New Model - The 2016 Scoop Foundation Membership Drive

Scoop Foundation Timeline:

Gordon Campbell: On Trump And The Madman Theory

Years ago, Richard Nixon explained to his chief adviser Bob Haldeman what has since become known as the “Madman Theory” of foreign policy. Basically, if America’s rivals could be reminded that Nixon was an unstable, rabid anti-Communist with his finger on the nuclear trigger, Nixon reasoned, then maybe they’d be less willing to challenge the US in the world’s hot spots… More>>

Australia And The South China Sea: Another Foreign Policy Blunder Looming

James O’Neill: The overblown rhetoric from the United States has led at least one commentator to describe so-called ‘analyses’ of the South China Sea situation as “the biggest load of analytical rubbish about South East Asia to emerge since the CIA mistook bee feces for a Soviet-supplied biological weapon in 1981.” More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news