Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Gordon Campbell on Act's latest round of leadership ructions

Gordon Campbell on the latest round of leadership ructions in the Act Party

Call me old fashioned, but the recent versions of the Act Party almost make you feel nostalgic for the days of its youth. Back in the 1990s, Act were happy to be seen as a bunch of Randian enthusiasts brimful of certainty that once New Zealand heard The Message, the public would willingly entrust Act’s enlightened ones with the job of saving the country from its state of benighted economic ignorance. Oh, happier days. True, Act never did have much faith in democracy. (Left to their own devices the public will always do the Wrong Thing.) Back then though, Act used to be a real political party - with ideals, a clear policy agenda and a definite sense of mission. All different now. These days, it is full of cold-eyed political careerists. Winning public office on merit, by putting Act’s policies up against all comers in a democratic contest on a level playing field yada yada ? What - are you completely out of your mind ?

And so it has come to pass that someone called Jamie Whyte - over the Christmas break he was being touted as Act’s latest saviour - told RNZ this morning that unless Act gets re-elected, the dreaded Labour/Green cabal will come to power at this year’s election. When even your esrtwhile saviour can’t think of how to get elected on any other grounds than preventing the dreaded alternative from eventuating, its a sad day in Randville. Oh, and in the same RNZ report, Act’s Epsom candidacy and/or the party leadership seemed to be going either as a twofer or on a buy one now and put the other on lay-by basis. Reportedly, an offer of some sort might be being made to Matthew Hooton. Again, not exactly on merit but in order to forestall another dastardly alternative, which might see Hooton launching his own political party and quel horreur, splitting the right wing vote in Epsom. Expedience again, from a party that used to pride itself - however deludedly - on its ideals and principles. And not merely as a branding exercise, either.

Desperate times do call for desperate measures. It all comes back to National and its need for coalition “partners” that it can contort into shapes able to fit the letter - if not the spirit - of the current rules of parliamentary representation, sufficient to enable the Key government to cling to power. Quite some time ago, Act signalled its willingness to be National’s sock puppet to achieve that end. No doubt, a similar deal will be carried out to enable Colin Craig‘s Conservatives to serve the same purpose. It should be clear by now that these entities are not genuine political parties but flags of convenience for National.

To be fair though, keeping National in power is not the only purpose of Act and the Conservatives. Yes, they do serve that role. They’re also useful however as laundering operations for a policy agenda that National dare not call its own, lest that endanger its image of moderation. Unlike Labour, National chooses to contract out its extremism. By doing so, it got charter schools up and running via Act, and if re-elected, it will get a virtual flat tax policy on the rails via the Conservatives, without ever having to own those policies itself. Instead, it habitually uses the coalition talks to spring them on the public, and thereby get its wishlist into place through the back door. This is in marked contrast to the modus operandi of Labour, which has always acted like a control freak towards its erstwhile coalition partners. Rather than use the Greens to get left wing policies in through the back door, the Clark government was always more inclined to lock the back door and pocket the keys.

Will a deal be done with Act in Epsom ? Hard to see how Act’s pitiful support levels nationwide would deliver much more for National than having its own candidate ( Rodney Hide perhaps, reborn in blue ?) win the seat. Otherwise a deal with Act seems likely to achieve little more than tainting the deal that National really wants to make, with the Conservatives. Think about it, though. Would you want to fly on a plane where the Conserrvatives were one wing, and the Act Party was the other wing ? You’d have to hope that such an aircraft never got off the ground.

ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news