Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


Kim & Key: A Tale of Two Smiling Assassins

Kim & Key: A Tale of Two Smiling Assassins

by Winona D’Costa
April 6, 2014

Kim Dotcom is like John Key. Both are ruthless survivors of corporate and government politics. In Dotcom, Key has found a genuine threat, unlike the flimsy ones offered by the Labour Party.

In his pre-politics era, John Key was known as the ‘smiling assassin’ for cheerfully firing dozens of employees while collecting a pay check of US$2.25 million. But life caught up with Key. What he did to others Dotcom is now doing to him.

Dotcom has become the ‘smiling assassin’ of New Zealand Politics. Dotcom has systematically and ruthless claimed the scalps of John Banks and Peter Dunne, National’s lifelines, all with a cheerful smile. John Banks, Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit, cabinet minister and ex-mayor of Auckland sunk low in the belly of Dotcom and is now no longer heard of. Peter Dunne, the ‘good’ boy of parliament faced public humiliation and slurs of infidelity all caused indirectly by Dotcom.

Slowly, but surely Kim Dotcom is zeroing in on John Key. The biggest blotch on Key’s perfect image is his handling of Dotcom. Unlikely Shearer or Cunliffe who can’t verbally go head to head with Key, Dotcom trashed Key in GCSB Select Committee meeting. “Why are you turning red Prime Minister?” Clearly Dotcom has succeeded where Cunilffe and Shearer have not: to get the Prime Minister turning red.

Should the Internet Party enter New Zealand Parliament it’s over for Key and National. If Dotcom wants the Prime Minister’s head on a plate to put in his mansion, the Internet Party and Dotcom is going to have play it a little smarter. He needs to create a party that people will want to vote for. A party with tangible policies that are not based on mere twitter tweets.

By flinging money at people Dotcom isn’t securing their vote. He needs to empathise with the people. He must get out and speak about the injustice done to him and explain how Key and National can make more citizens victims of their power. Then the Internet Party will emerge a true contender.

Dotcom has already exposed National’s abuse of power without entering parliament. If his party occupies seats in parliament, John Key will have to do the one thing he never imagined himself doing: quitting. Resigning. Walking away with his tail between his legs. Maybe Dotcom will hire him as Chief of Staff for the Internet Party.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Binoy Kampmark: Dysfunctional Hagiography: Australia & Gough Whitlam's Death

Hagiography is the curse of the Australian Labor movement. It is a movement that searches for, and craves, mythical figures and myths. Such a phenomenon might be termed mummification, and detracts from closer examination. More>>

David Swanson: On Killing Trayvons

This Wednesday is a day of action that some are calling a national day of action against police brutality, with others adding 'and mass incarceration,' and I'd like to add 'and war' and make it global rather than national. More>>

Uri Avnery: Israel Ignoring “Tectonic Change” In Public Opinion

If the British parliament had adopted a resolution in favour of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, the reaction of our media would have been like this: More>>

ALSO:

| UK MPs blow a “raspberry” at Netanyahu and his serfs

Byron Clark: Fiji Election: Crooks In Suits

On September 17 Fiji held its first election since Voreqe “Frank” Bainimarama seized power in a 2006 coup. With his Fiji First party receiving 59.2% of the vote, Bainimarama will remain in power. More>>

Ramzy Baroud: ‘Islamic State’ Sectarianism Is Not Coincidental

Consider this comical scene described by Peter Van Buren, a former US diplomat, who was deployed to Iraq on a 12-month assignment in 2009-10: Van Buren led two Department of State teams assigned with the abstract mission of the ‘reconstruction’ of ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Case For Using Air Power Against The Islamic State

There is an Alice Through the Looking Glass quality to the current response to the Islamic State. Everything about it seems inside out. Many people who would normally oppose US air strikes in other countries have reluctantly endorsed the bombing of IS positions in Iraq and Syria – not because they think air power alone will defeat IS (clearly it won’t) but because it will slow it down, and impede its ability to function. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news