Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | News Flashes | Scoop Features | Scoop Video | Strange & Bizarre | Search

 


RockEnrol, Labour and the Mana party

RockEnrol, Labour and the Mana party

by Don Franks
May 30, 2014

Optimus Gryme, Third3ye and Chronophonium are coming to town.

In a run up to the September general election, these artists will be hitting the stage in a series of concerts and house parties.

Shows will be free – conditionally. The ticket fee is waived if you’re enrolled to vote.

The movement is a part of RockEnrol, an organisation launched to fight the country's drastically low youth-voter turnout with pop culture.

Auckland hip-hop group Third3ye, who played this year's Laneway festival say they want to change the way youth approach politics.

Third3ye frontman, Bronson Price says:

"There are lots of issues that directly affect us and we can change the outcome”

Founders of RockEnrol, Laura O'Connell-Rapira, 25, and Sam Dyson, 21, say the organisation's focus is on getting youth to vote - no matter who for.

"We aren't backing any political party, we just want youth to get out there and vote. Because what kind of democracy are we without that?"

In the 2011 election 42 per cent of 18-24 year-olds did not vote - compared with just 5.2 per cent of those over 65.

RockEnrol is hoping to finally launch a relatable movement for youth - with O'Connell-Rapira acknowledging nothing is more annoying than irrelevant old people telling youth what to do.

"There's nothing worse than a campaign supposedly for youth that is just really naff and lame - it gets boring, all ‘vote, vote, vote, vote, vote'."

Yes, it does get boring, and, worse than boring, voting for parliament is a con.

You read all the different pamphlets carefully, consider the policies, go to a few meetings and ask the candidates some questions. You might even help give pamphlets out, or put up signs or bake a fundraising cake. Then, finally, on the big day you get down to the polling booth, receive your voting form, check it carefully and place your tick wherever you choose.

You have then, supposedly, played a small but definite part in changing the outcome of issues that affect you.

If that really was the case, your effort would have been worthwhile, and well done RockEnrol for getting you organized.

Except that voting for parliament is not about people changing the outcome of issues. Voting for New Zealand parliamentarians in 2014 is essentially about acknowleging the dictatorship of big business interests.

Manufacturing, trade, investment and banking, all the things that affect people’s lives most, all of these proceed with the least possible interference from parliament.

Yes, there are such things as employment laws hammered out and passed in parliament. On examination, these laws reveal themselves as heavily favouring business interests. On closer examination, these laws may be seen to be flouted regularly, the recent Easter trading farce being only a more visible example.

And yes, there are social issues grappled with and put to rights in the parliamentary chamber, like the homosexual law reforms of recent ties

On examination social reforms such as this are legislated years after society has already informally made the changes. In the case of homosexual law reform, many years after.

Still, changes are signed off in parliament, decisions are made there. Just not the vital economic decisions that make or break employment, threaten work safety, or trash the environment. At the first sign of serious disruption to profiteering, the magic words “BUSINESS CONFIDENTIALITY” are intoned.

Upon which all the MPs shrink respectfully and rapidly away.

As an old comrade once rightly observed: “You can take them all the petitions you like, but the surplus value is spoken for".

So what do do? if voting changes nothing, does anything else?

Mass actions of working people, especially in their work places and in cooperation with fellow workers in other lands. That is how workers got the vote in the first place. Back in the day, payment for MPs was a progressive demand. Now, parliament is in the process of turning into its opposite, changing from being something of a people’s voice into something of a people’s fetter.

That’s why it's a tragedy that activists continue to maintain the parliamentary illusion, by supporting the Mana/ Kimdot Money alliance.

Again and again Mana leaders remind us that their bottom line is getting rid of National.

As if Labour was any better – on immigration and old age pensions Labour is worse than National.

But if getting rid of National was the be all and end all - why Mana at all?

Why not cut to the chase and join Labour?

RockErol have a point, Young people have lead the way in political struggles around the world and down the generations.

If RockErol want to benefit youth politically they should leave off begging them to vote in the general election. They should encourage youth to destroy capitalism.

More socially useful, and definitely never boring.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The Latest Allegations Against Helen Clark

According to former PM and UNDP leader current Helen Clark, the allegations leveled at her this week in a Foreign Policy magazine article by the prize-winning UN journalist Colum Lynch have been ‘totally fabricated’. Hmmm. That would be very, very surprising. More>>

Letter From The Editor: The State Of Scoop

Gordon Campbell: The PledgeMe campaign currently being run by the Scoop Foundation does provide a useful opportunity to update you on what gets done with your money. Further down the track, other documents will set out what we plan to do, resources permitting. For now, lets stick with the practical nuts and bolts. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Rise Of The Far Right (And Battle Bots)

In his victory speech at the Cannes film festival this week, the British film director Ken Loach [pictued] warned that the rise of far right parties in Europe was being fuelled by the economic policies of austerity, and manifested in a welfare bureaucracy that systematically denies assistance to those in most need. More>>

Julienne Molineaux: Stuff-Me - The Newspaper Gobble-Up

In New Zealand, concentration of newspaper ownership via mergers and acquisitions has a long pre-digital history. The trends of declining readership and fragmented audiences began before digital content, and mergers and acquisitions proceeded apace, enabled by weak legislative protections. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Foundation Membership Drive:

The Scoop Foundation: The best chance to create an independent guardian for public interest journalism in NZ

The Scoop Foundation is seeking public support to safeguard the future of public interest journalism in New Zealand. To ensure public access to comprehensive, free, timely news is maintained during this dark hour for journalism. And to provide every voice in NZ the opportunity to be heard in the national debate. More>>
PLEDGE NOW: Journalism: A New Model - The 2016 Scoop Foundation Membership Drive

Scoop Foundation Timeline:

Gordon Campbell: On Trump And The Madman Theory

Years ago, Richard Nixon explained to his chief adviser Bob Haldeman what has since become known as the “Madman Theory” of foreign policy. Basically, if America’s rivals could be reminded that Nixon was an unstable, rabid anti-Communist with his finger on the nuclear trigger, Nixon reasoned, then maybe they’d be less willing to challenge the US in the world’s hot spots… More>>

Australia And The South China Sea: Another Foreign Policy Blunder Looming

James O’Neill: The overblown rhetoric from the United States has led at least one commentator to describe so-called ‘analyses’ of the South China Sea situation as “the biggest load of analytical rubbish about South East Asia to emerge since the CIA mistook bee feces for a Soviet-supplied biological weapon in 1981.” More>>

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Top Scoops
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news