Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More
Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search

 

What Did You do During the Dirty Wars, Daddy?

Duty to Warn

What Did You do During the Dirty Wars, Daddy?

by Gary G. Kohls, MD
December 3, 2014

“What Did You Do During The War, Daddy?” was the title of a wonderful but sobering book written by Sabine Reichel. Reichel was born in 1946 to Nazi collaborator parents in bombed-out Hamburg, Germany. Her parents had been upper class citizens prior to the war and they managed to maintain their respectability after the war. Her mother and father, like so many other obedient “good” Germans of the Nazi-era never talked to their child about what they had done during the Hitler years. The unwelcome truth only came out much later, during Reichel’s early adult years. The book details her experiences in trying to obtain the answers to the book’s title question.

“What did you do during the war, daddy” has been a dreaded question for many soldier-fathers (as well as for some civilian parents) who collaborated (actively or passively) with warmongers in times of war, and who then discovered, too late, that they had been on the ethically wrong side of what turned out to be an unjust war - a war that might have contrary to what they had been told, a war of aggression or corporate resource exploitation and therefore a war that was an international war crime, a crime against humanity or a crime against the peace.

And whether or not they had been deceived by their corporate-controlled governments and media outlets (shadow or otherwise) about the realities of those wars, any parent will dread being asked probing questions such as these: “Did you profit from, or were you on the side of flag-waving, war-mongering politicians, the corporate war profiteers or the gun-runners of your country that beat the drums for war?” “Did you swallow whole the repeated nationalistic pro-war messages of the media’s propaganda machine that glorified war and obscured the inconvenient truths about the organized, indiscriminate mass slaughter that is modern war?” “Did you remain silent in the face of your nation’s war crimes when innocent, unarmed civilians on the “other side” were being demonized, starved, bombed, poisoned, persecuted, imprisoned, “disappeared”, made homeless, or becoming victims of “collateral damage”?

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Some nonviolence-embracing fathers, if they had strong consciences and courage to match, refuse to kill and die in an unjust war. Because they could honorably and truthfully answer, they might welcome the following questions: “Daddy, when you sensed that the war was an unjust one did you refuse to sign up and support it? Did you speak out against your era’s war as well as other forms of violence? Did you join the resistance against the war-mongering majorities? Did you march in public anti-war actions and actively try to reverse your nation’s misbegotten involvement in war?”

Becoming “Good (Catholic and Protestant) Germans” (and Americans)
Multitudes of guilty World War II-era German parents, most of whom were baptized Christians, faced these questions when their children started reading between the lines of their censored school history books. They realized that war crimes had been committed by their nation and therefore perhaps also by their patriotic parents.

The same could be said about American Protestant children whose fathers were of draft age during the Vietnam War or of average Catholic Christians whose leaders were in positions of authority and counsel during the Dirty Wars in Central and South America, wars that were often fomented and then aggressively supported by the United States’ military/industrial/congressional complex during the Reagan/Bush years.

In every nation, the history books have been written by the patriots, nationalists, militarists and assorted victors who feel compelled to preserve the myths of the “glory” of war. Since war crimes (at the very least, rape and pillage) have been committed by soldiers on all sides of all wars throughout the history of warfare, there is a tremendous amount of motivation to cover-up the shameful deeds that are so easy to commit during the fog of war.

An example that comes to mind is the Catholic Joseph Ratzinger (now emeritus Pope Benedict XVI), who joined the Hitler Youth in his teens. Young, naïve Joseph has every right to feel fully justified in that act of German patriotism and nationalism. But later, as Archbishop of Munich, the historical hotbed of German fascism and a city that nurtured Adolf Hitler and spawned the Nazi Party during the 1920s.

One wonders what the archbishop would have said if his parishioners had asked him what he had done during the war, since participation in the killing of friends or enemies was clearly contrary to the teachings and modeling of the pacifist Jesus.

What Would Jesus have Done During the Dirty Wars in Protestant North America or Catholic South and Central America?
Church leaders of all denominations (in nations that have been granted special tax privileges by their governments) have been dutifully denying the established facts about the soul murders committed against vulnerable children and adolescents by violent adults such as drill sergeants and pedophile priests. Protestant and Catholic clergy were guilty of not resisting Hitler’s Nazi Party early enough. And the Vatican must shoulder a lot of responsibility in the successful establishment and growth of Mussolini’s Fascist Party. And, of course, the Vatican had a large roles to play in the birth and growth of the brutal militarist, imperialistic regimes in both Germany and the Dirty Wars in the predominantly catholic South and Central American nations during the 1970s and 1980s.

Of course, one must ask the simplistic question that doesn’t seem to be ever asked of (or answered by) Christian clerical or lay leaders of most denominations. And that is ”What Would Jesus Have Done” in the war? The clear answer that even secular humanists can easily answer: It’s obvious, Jesus would have actively and nonviolently resisted all forms of violence, as he indeed did, even if it meant that he would have to suffer. He had already clearly taught his followers to refuse to participate in homicidal violence and he would have expected them to perform righteously rather than satanically.

In my studies of the history of early Christianity, I have lamented the fact that, in the early 300s, the murderous empire-builder Constantine was able to draw the church away from its pacifist beginnings. Similarly, I have also lamented the fact that now, 20 centuries after the birth of Christianity, the religion of my birth and upbringing has likewise been co-opted away from its first principles, so that apparently one can be a follower of the non-violent Jesus and still be willing to send its vulnerable, easily brain-washed, historically- and theologically-illiterate youth off to kill and be killed - direct negating what Jesus said and did.

German Christianity and Prussian Militarism
In both World Wars I & II, baptized and confirmed Germans enthusiastically marched off to what they thought were justified wars, wars fought “defending” against the threats posed by various minority or outsider groups that were accused of endangering the “holy” Fatherland. Conscription laws had to be relaxed as the wars progressed to include children and older men up to the age of 60 because, eventually, most of the ideal-age young adult men were dead, disabled or otherwise used up and cast aside. German men were told by their Catholic and Protestant bishops and pastors that it was their Christian duty to fight and kill for the Fuhrer, and the women were told to support the troops, the war mission and the Thousand Year Reich by having lots of babies.

Doing One’s “Sacred” Duty to Serve Volk, Fuhrer und Vaterland
The patriotic duty for all patriotic Germans was to serve “Volk, Fuhrer und Vaterland”. Germany had a habit of waging aggressive wars that were later to be justifiably defined at the Nuremberg trials as crimes against humanity and international war crimes. The soldier’s sacred oath of allegiance to Hitler and his killing machine totally trumped the Golden Rule of the gospels and the Christic ethical principles of love of friend, neighbor and enemy, basic gospel truths that were rarely taught from German pulpits. That sad reality certainly seems to be true of American churches today, yesterday and probably tomorrow.

Most German Christians saw no contradiction between the demands of Jesus’ gospel ethic of love, mercy and forgiveness and the ruthless and cruel "gods" of war and wealth. There wasn’t even a hint of a gospel nonviolence movement among German Christians. Dietrich Bonhoeffer had come along far too late.

German Christians couldn’t have been expected to understand the practicality of the ethical teachings of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. They didn’t make the connections between the stories of the early Christian martyrs (who knew Jesus best) and their total refusal to engage in homicidal violence, even against their enemies. It’s likely that none of the religious books that they had studied in Sunday School or seminary had talked about the demonic nature of war. German Christian soldiers, as is the case of many other Christian soldiers, may have mistakenly regarded the presence of Christian chaplains in the military as an endorsement of war and therefore as somehow being compatible with the teachings of Jesus.

Going Into Battle With “Gott Mit Uns” on Their Belt Buckles
German soldiers in both World Wars went into battle with the words “Gott Mit Uns” (God With Us) inscribed on their belt buckles. There was a well-oiled media machinery that consistently pumped out pro-war propaganda. Perhaps these patriotic soldiers weren’t aware that the anti-war, anti-fascist and socialist printing presses had been silenced, indeed, well before WWII started, they had been smashed. Given the inglorious history of Europe’s church-endorsed Reformation, Counter-Reformation, Thirty Year and Hundred Year wars, Prussian militarism was regarded as somehow being normal, even godly.

To illustrate how so many “Good Germans” were brain-washed into becoming accessories to murder, I include below a long excerpt from a homily delivered by Father Emmanuel Charles McCarthy at Auschwitz on the 50th anniversary of the August 9, 1942 gassing, murder and incineration of a Carmelite Catholic nun, Edith Stein. Stein was a brilliant Jewish feminist and scholar who had converted to Christianity prior to the institution of the “Final Solution”. She changed her name to Sister Maria Theresa of the Cross when she entered the Carmel at Cologne during the early years of the war. The homily is titled “Mission of Peace at Auschwitz”.

Mission of Peace at Auschwitz

“It is a truism of Christian existence that if the Gospel of Jesus Christ is proclaimed in all its fullness except as it relates to the great spiritual failures of one's own time, the Gospel has not been proclaimed. Failure to speak and act in a Christ-like fashion in relation to the diabolical operations of one's own age can even make Christianity an accomplice in evil.

“Silence (or its sophisticated equivalent, open-ended ambiguous moral statements capable of an indefinite number of interpretations) gives consent. The Christian Church knows this. Hence, at different periods over her two-thousand-year history, she has taken a red pencil and underlined with maximal authority certain words of the Gospel which people inside and outside the church at a particular time were in dire need of facing and accepting.

“The most obvious reality about Auschwitz is that Auschwitz is about homicide. Whatever else one wants to say about Edith Stein's death, it is, like Jesus' death, homicide. As the 20th century winds down, 100 million corpses of people who have been killed at the hands of other human beings bear witness to nine decades of unmatched homicidal savagery. This death toll is more than all the centuries of recorded history combined and, as of today, we are still counting. If the moral moment has not now come for the Church to take out her red pencil and underline Jesus' teachings on enmity and homicidal violence and to inform her own people that they must stop their participation in the state-sponsored tournaments of homicide called war, then it is hard to see what level of demonic behavior would have to be reached for the Church to remove her people from those spirits and apparatuses of human destruction which are so contrary to all that Jesus was and taught.

“There is no such thing as a Christian military solution to the evil of homicidal violence. A Christ-like war is a lie. It is obviously not a Christ-like solution, if, instead of my child or friend being destroyed, someone else's child or friend is destroyed. National military solutions without exception are willing to throw someone else's child or friend into the flames and therefore cannot be in line with the teaching of Jesus, who would throw no one into the flames.

Yet, the historical record is beyond dispute. Since the time of Constantine (312 CE) to this time of global radiation, Christians have been killing each other, as well as non-Christians, and have been blessed for doing so by other Christians. The Christian allegiance to the spirit and behavioral demands of state endorsed homicide has been nothing short of idolatrous.

“Over and over again the Church - Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant - has permitted her sacramental, catechistical and educational systems to become part of the Pantheon of "myths men kill by". The following excerpt from an address by Bishop Franz Josef Rarkowski, the Catholic Bishop for the German Military, who was directly responsible for the moral and spiritual guidance of German Catholics in World War II, is illustrative and utterly normal in Church history:

“Each of you knows what is at stake for our Volk in these stormy days, and, in whatever is asked of you, each sees before him the shining example of a true warrior, our Fuhrer and Supreme Commander, the first and most valiant soldier of the Greater German Reich, who is even now with you at the battlefront. We will never forget that first day of September (1939) when he issued his formal call to arms to the entire Volk. You, too, were somewhere out there...your ears and hearts were witness to that historic moment when the Fuhrer stepped before the whole Yolk in his old military cloak of army gray. You heard his words and sensed in them your Supreme Commander's love and concern...Thus, the example of the Fuhrer stands before you in brilliant glory.”

“This kind of anti-Gospel catechesis and rhetoric in support of homicide and enmity can be found in the mouths of most Christian pastors wherever on this globe the Church - Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant - has been established since the Fourth Century. Again, if the time is not here for the Church to pick up her red pencil and put an "X" through all of this sham Christianity, while simultaneously underlining in red Jesus' teachings that reject enmity and homicide, when will the time be here for her to sever her alliance in homicide with the state?

“The flames of Auschwitz in which Edith Stein was incinerated were the bitter fruit of an ecumenical Christian effort. At least 90% of the people responsible for the immediate operation of Auschwitz, and for the civilian bureaucratic support systems that was absolutely necessary for its existence, were baptized Christians.”

Whatever the process, Germans were well-prepared to obediently follow their Fuhrer; and just as all soldiers everywhere solemnly take their oaths, pledge their allegiance to and salute the flag, obey orders (even illegal ones) and promise to fulfill their "duty to God and Country,” so did German soldiers pledge their allegiance to Hitler and the swastika and to do their duty to ensure homeland security.

Failure to Exercise Their Duty to Warn Prospective Disabled Veterans
Sadly but predictably, the military and religious leaders of all militarized nations throughout history do not exercise their duty to warn their prospective soldiers about the high likelihood of becoming victims of the usually permanent, brain-altering, soul-destroying, neurological disease known as “shell shock” (in WW I), “battle fatigue” and “combat stress” (in WW II and the Korean War) or, finally and more accurately, combat-induced posttraumatic stress disorder (in
Vietnam and beyond).

And so most of us sheeple vote for our representatives without knowing a thing about their susceptibility to intimidation by the Pentagon, the CIA, the FBI, the NRA and the NSA or whether or not they will accept bribes (aka campaign contributions) from antidemocratic billionaires or institutions such as right-wing think tanks and megacorporations (especially weapons manufacturers, Big Banks and Big Oil). By our inability to directly question candidates for national office, we have already become dumbed-down enough to feel impotent and uncertain about the justifiability of our nation’s current or past wars. We therefore have become, just like average Good Germans in the Hitler era, pre-emptively unified in our willingness to make murder for the state when the next false flag is waved, the next war games are scheduled and the next aggressive war gets started.

If we want to avoid having to squirm or lie when our disappointed, justifiably angry, soon-to-be-impoverished, education-deprived, malnourished, jobless and debt-ridden children ask us questions about what we did during America’s current wars of economic and military imperialism (“full spectrum domination”), and the on-rushing destruction and depletion of the planet’s resources, we must at least refuse to be complacent about the slaughter of our fellow planetary inhabitants that is being perpetrated in our name.

Members of antiwar, anti-imperialist resistance groups that are supporting or participating in the nonviolent Occupy Wall Street and other justice movements won't have to be evasive when their children and grandchildren ask them “what did you do during the war?”

Instead, they will be able to proudly tell them about their resistance efforts that might then give them hope and encourage them to follow in the footsteps of their altruistic mothers, fathers, grandmas and grandpas who did what they could do to stop the wealth-extractors, the polluters and the war-mongers before they could start the next war or poison the next river.

Hopefully it is not already too late.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Top Scoops Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.