Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Kim Jong Un, Saddam Hussein & Moammar Gadhafi

By Richard S. Ehrlich

BANGKOK, Thailand -- North Korea's Kim Jong Un learned from Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gadhafi that nuclear weapons protect his survival, and will disarm only if President Trump withdraws American forces and ends the U.S.-South Korea defense treaty, said James Trottier who led diplomatic efforts in Pyongyang.

North Korea agreed to "site closure, & no more testing!" Mr. Trump tweeted on April 23 after Pyongyang announced on April 21 it would halt developing and testing nuclear weapons.

Pyongyang however made no mention of dismantling thermonuclear warheads and developmental ICBMs it supposedly possesses.

"North Korea views its nuclear capacity as a deterrent, not as a means to launch a suicidal strike resulting in their total destruction. The North Koreans are not jihadists seeking some afterlife," Mr. Trottier said.

"For Kim, basically nuclear weapons are key to his survival. He's learned the lessons of Saddam Hussein and Moammar Gadhafi -- what happens when WMDs [weapons of mass destruction] are bargained away."

When Mr. Trottier was accredited to North Korea he led four Canadian diplomatic delegations to Pyongyang in 2015 and 2016. He was also a diplomatic liaison officer to U.S./U.N. Forces in South Korea.

The former career Canadian diplomat directed political and economic diplomacy at Canada's embassies in South Korea and Southeast Asia, and served at Canada's permanent mission to the United Nations in New York.

"The only remote possibility for this [total denuclearization] would be at a price that would probably be politically unacceptable to the U.S. and its allies," said Mr. Trottier who is now a lawyer and Canadian Global Affairs Institute fellow.

"It's the 'security guarantee' part which the North Koreans mentioned to the South Koreans, which always seems to be dropped from the [news] coverage of the Trump-Kim upcoming summit."

To satisfy Mr. Kim, that guarantee must include withdrawal of U.S. forces from the Korean peninsula and cancellation of the Washington-Seoul mutual defense treaty.

Previous U.S. presidents rejected those North Korean proposals.

Major fighting in the 1950-53 Korean War by the U.S., North Korea and other forces ended with the peninsula partitioned by an armistice, without a peace treaty between Washington and Pyongyang.

In recent months, Mr. Kim denounced Mr. Trump as a senile, elderly "dotard" while the U.S. president mocked the North Korean leader as "little rocket man."

"Kim Jong Un and the North Korean leadership are not irrational. On the contrary, they are coldly rational and committed to the regime's survival by making North Korea a nuclear weapons state," Mr. Trottier said, speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club of Thailand during a recent analysis of a Trump-Kim summit.

The north's vulnerability is its ruined economy, shattered by U.S.-led international sanctions.

To ease sanctions, Mr. Kim may be now agreeing to pause development and testing new nuclear weapons while deeper issues are tackled later.

"There is no good military option for the U.S.," Mr. Trottier warned.

"A major pre-emptive [U.S.] strike on North Korea would result in a retaliatory attack on South Korea -- on Seoul and possibly beyond -- with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Koreans, billions of dollars in damage in South Korea and a risk of a full-scale war.

"With North Korea's thousands of conventional artillery pieces, camouflaged in mountains within 60 kilometers (37 miles) from Seoul, it's very unlikely that American and South Korean bombers could destroy these batteries before they've laid waste to much of Seoul," Mr. Trottier said.

To ease tensions, Pyongyang could downplay its existing nuclear weapons, said Balazs Szalontai, a Seoul-based Korea University associate professor of North Korea's foreign policies.

"The U.S. and South Korea might try to persuade North Korea to behave like those medium nuclear powers that possess deliverable nuclear weapons but rarely, if ever, make any threats and generally don't even mention their nuclear capability in their ordinary interactions with other states -- like Britain and France," Mr. Szalontai said in an interview.

"Those countries would be also absolutely unwilling to dismantle their nuclear weapons, but their neighbors have no reason to regard them as a nuclear threat," he said.

"In South Korean political psychology, there is also a deeply embedded fear of U.S. abandonment, rooted in the memory of the Korean War. As many or most South Koreans see it, the 1949 withdrawal of U.S. troops was the factor that encouraged North Korea to launch an attack in 1950.

"Such fears were periodically revived in the 1960s and 1970s whenever the U.S. planned or actually implemented a partial troop withdrawal, or reacted passively to Pyongyang's confrontational acts," Mr. Szalontai said.


Richard S. Ehrlich is a Bangkok-based journalist from San Francisco, California, reporting news from Asia since 1978 and winner of Columbia University's Foreign Correspondent's Award. He is a co-author of three non-fiction books about Thailand, including "'Hello My Big Big Honey!' Love Letters to Bangkok Bar Girls and Their Revealing Interviews," "60 Stories of Royal Lineage," and "Chronicle of Thailand: Headline News Since 1946." Mr. Ehrlich also contributed to the chapter "Ceremonies and Regalia" in a book published in English and Thai titled, "King Bhumibol Adulyadej, A Life's Work: Thailand's Monarchy in Perspective." Mr. Ehrlich's newest book, "Sheila Carfenders, Doctor Mask & President Akimbo" describes a female mental patient who is abducted to Asia by her San Francisco psychiatrist.

His online sites are:


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Binoy Kampmark: Tom Wolfe The Parajournalist

As New Journalism’s primary advocate, Tom Wolfe headed the field with such experimental forces as Norman Mailer, Truman Capote and Hunter S. Thompson, all dedicated to enriching supposedly factual accounts with excessive flourishes that hurried out the beige in favour of the kaleidoscopic. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Racism And The Windsors

For all the talk about the modernizing effect that Meghan Markle could have on the Royal Family, the suspicion all along has been that the House of Windsor is resistant to change at any level beyond the purely decorative. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Prospects Of US Talks With North Korea

On June 12, the leaders of North Korea and the United States will meet across a table in Singapore, and Kim Jong Un must already be feeling giddy at the thought that this meeting is already being described with the word “summit” formerly reserved for meetings between superpowers of equal stature... Image: Steve Bolton NZ's contribution to the IAEA’s work on North Korea

  • United Nations - UN chief ‘optimistic’ over peace efforts
  • David Swanson - Enough is Enough. The Time Has Come to BDS the US - Peace Comes to Korea: Let’s Understand Why
  • CTBTO - CTBTO on North Korea
  • NZ Govt - NZ welcomes talks between North and South Korea
  • Massey University - Nukes to cyber war – NZ security in focus
  • Jim Miles - The Doomsday Machine - Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner
  • UNHCHR - North Korea detente: UN expert urges human rights opening
  • Binoy Kampmark - Trump, North Korea and Post-Olympic Angst
  • Gordon Campbell: On National’s Latest Attempts At Relevance

    Having ignored the existence of massive problems in health and education for nine years in government, it is no longer politically viable for National to maintain the pretence that such problems really don’t exist, or are somehow unworthy of serious concern by rational men of commerce.... More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On The Need For Immediate Action On WINZ

    So the old saying goes, the main difference between the centre-right and centre-left is that both believe in market solutions, but the centre-left spends a lot more time worrying about the effects, afterwards. More>>

    Gordon Campbell: On Petrol Pricing And The Midwives March

    The public brawl between Energy Minister Megan Woods and BP looks like spinning off – as brawls tend to do – into a whole array of extraneous matters. Evidently, some people find it hard to see the difference between taxes and profits. More>>