Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Proposed euthanasia bill in NZ 'needs tweaking'

The path to assisted dying in Victoria

The wording of proposed euthanasia legislation should be tightened to ensure it only applies to the terminally ill, members of an Australian advisory panel say.

Lecretia Seales
died while fighting in the courts for the right to end her
life. Photo: FACEBOOK

Lecretia Seales died while fighting in the courts for the right to end her life. Photo: FACEBOOK

Listen duration 18:12

Click a link to play audio (or right-click to download) in either
MP3 format or in OGG format.

Parliament's justice select committee is nearing the end of a nationwide tour hearing submissions on the controversial End of Life Choice Bill.

The committee will hear from people at Parliament in Wellington today.

Laywer Julian Gardner and disability advocate Tricia Malowney were members of the Victorian Ministerial Advisory Panel which was convened before the state became the first in Australia to legalise assisted dying for the terminally ill.

Mr Gardner told Nine to Noon the Victorian law has a number of safeguards in the legislation, including that a person has the capacity to make the decision, and has an incurable disease or illness that is likely to cause death within six months, or 12 months for a neurodegenerative condition.

The New Zealand bill needed to be re-worded, he said.

"I think the intention was that it would be [for people with] a terminal condition and I think the bill would be strengthened by just clarifying that point because this is about end of life as the title of the bill suggests."

Mr Gardner said he was asked to be on the advisory panel as a human rights expert, not as a euthanasia supporter.

"The evidence that we listened to from the people in the community and so many medical specialists, led me to very strongly see that this is a very necessary piece of legislation."

New Zealand's was a "sound bill" that needed only minor tweaking, he said.

Ms Malowney said she was also swayed by the evidence before the panel.

"At the end of it, I came to support the bill that we ended up getting passed."

She also said she believed the New Zealand bill needed to be re-worded.

"I think it plays into the fears of people with disabilities. I have an incurable irremediable condition, but it's not going to kill me yet, hope I've got 40 years or so.

"If we change the wording, having a disability isn't a reason for accessing it, would strengthen it."

The legislation was for people at the end of their life, not for people who were old or disabled, she said.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The Anti-Corbyn Split In British Labour

The resignation of seven UK Labour MPs in protest against the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn is another example of the centre-left’s readiness to sabotage its own cause... More>>

Scoop 3.0 Update & Membership Sale: The End Of ‘Objectivity’ In Journalism

2019 looks like it might well be another really bad, terrible, not so good year for the traditional journalism model globally... on the positive side, smaller independent players with innovative digital models and a more open approach like our ScoopPro service look likely to be more relevant than ever. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On America’s ‘Green New Deal’

‘Socialism’ is more of a political scare word than an objective condition. Even in the US, as Nate Silver’s 538 website pointed out this week there is polling evidence that modern Americans are inclined to treat socialism as meaning ‘equality’ rather than the ‘government ownership or control’ that Americans understood the term to mean back in the 1940s... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Listening To Ocasio-Cortez About Tax

In its attitudes to tax, New Zealand has been the last colonial outpost of Thatcherism. Change, however, may be in the air. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Nelson Fire And Climate Change

The Nelson fire has been a useful warning of things to come, given how climate change will (a) increase the likelihood of reduced rainfall and drought-like conditions in many parts of New Zealand, which – obviously – will raise (b) the fire danger and (c) the cost of providing the communities at risk with the enhanced firefighting capabilities that they’re going to need. More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog