Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


New Zealand men to be congratulated for women’s suffrage

Press release: Suffrage Day, 19 September 2018

New Zealand men were early adopters of a radical idea in giving women the vote 125 years ago, says the author of a new book on women who were first in their field.

“New Zealand men can feel proud that male parliamentarians here gave women the vote almost a decade before any other country,” says Jane Tolerton, author of But I Changed All That: ‘First’ New Zealand women.

“Australia gave women the vote at federation in 1902, but did not enfranchise aboriginal women. The United States did not give women the vote until 1920, and Britain waited until 1928 to give all over-21 year olds the vote. That’s three and a half decades after it happened here.

“We were way ahead of similar countries and there was no violence involved. Yet we tend to spin the suffrage story as a long, hard fight for women. We have a better story to tell – of early and relatively easy achievement. In Britain the Women’s Social and Political Union ran a terrorist campaign, and they were roughly treated by police, jailed and force fed.

“Noting that our men were ahead of the game is more hopeful in terms of increasing gender equity today. Why bash the most progressive men of the 1890s over the head for being slow to yield when they were years ahead of their counterparts in any other self-governing nation?” Tolerton asks.

“Obviously it was either a long, hard fight or we were first in the world by years. It’s hard to argue it was both, but that is how we present this story. The Women’s Christian Temperance Union began in New Zealand in 1885 and Kate Sheppard became the franchise superintendent in 1887. That was the beginning of the women’s movement, based on action plans from the United States where Wyoming was the first territory to give women the vote, in 1869.

“However, many New Zealand men and women were inspired by British parliamentarian John Stuart Mill’s call for women’s suffrage from the late 1860s. Three premiers became suffragists as a result: Julius Vogel, Robert Stout and John Ballance. So did Mary Ann Muller, who anonymously wrote articles that were published as a book appealing for women’s suffrage in 1869 and Mary Ann Colclough, who openly advocated it in Auckland in the early 1870s.

“The two movements, one from Britain, one from America, both had a strong impact here. When Kate Sheppard wrote about a ‘long, hard fight’ for suffrage she did not just mean eight years of the WCTU, but two previous decades of advocacy.”

The men’s role is hidden in the history as it is told today, says Tolerton. “I hear women saying, ‘We shouldn’t say we were given the vote; we should say we took it.’ But we could not take it. It had to be voted through by parliamentarians.

“Recently there has been more emphasis on the 1893 petition. It was impressively large, with the names of 25 per cent of women over 21. But it was not a referendum. It could not force the issue in the way implied on the Ministry for Women website, which reads: ‘On 19 September 1893, after submitting a petition with nearly 32,000 signatures, New Zealand became the first self-governing country to grant women the vote.’

“The 1893 petition meant it was harder to say women did not want the vote. However, it was not a major turning point. A suffrage bill had passed both houses of parliament the previous year – though an amendment in the upper house had not been accepted by the House of Representatives, so it failed

“It was politics that saw the bill through Parliament in September 1893. With an election looming, two conservative members in the upper house decided not to put in their intended amendment, but vote for a Liberal Government bill. They believed women would vote conservative – and so did the government, which is why Premier Richard Seddon had persuaded some Liberals not to vote for it. This tricky political story makes the petition more attractive as a way of explaining why the bill passed.”

Tolerton’s new book But I Changed All That: ‘First’ New Zealand women features photographs of the first woman mayor, general practitioner, MP, prime minister and governor general. It also includes firsts from sports and cinema, arts and academia.

“One of the obvious features about early women ‘firsts’ is that there was little fuss in New Zealand about letting women into universities, even to become doctors and lawyers. We were a new and progressive country and changed the conventions to suit our society. There was a triumphant feminist movement in the 1890s, but there was a backlash based on eugenic ideas after 1900 and a push for motherhood rather than careers for women.”

Tolerton is working on a book on why New Zealand got the women’s vote so early and a woman MP so late, with the election of Elizabeth McCombs 40 years almost to the day after the vote was won.

Her 2017 book Make Her Praises Heard Afar told the story of New Zealand women overseas in World War I. “By having left women out of our World War I story and men out of our suffrage story, we have painted ourselves as less gender equal than we actually were.

“We could tell the suffrage and war stories in a way that both reflects us better and reflects on us better by including both men and women. The Women’s Christian Temperance Union members would spin in their graves at this suggestion, as they were prohibitionists, but shouting a man a drink and saying ‘Thanks, mate!’ would be a healthy response.

“We have a lot of problems on the gender equity front, but we have to confront them – actively campaign, and succeed, as women did in the early 1890s. Instead, we tend to say we have a long way to go and yet pat ourselves on the back for still being ‘ahead of the game’. We were ahead of the game in 1893, but a decade later we were not, as Australia allowed women to become MPs while we did not.”


© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


UN Rights Declaration At 70: We Are All Born Free And Equal

On Article 1 of the UDHR: Dignity is the foundation of all human rights. Human beings have rights, and should be treated with utmost care, precisely because each one possesses intrinsic worth. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The (Delayed) Judgment Day For Theresa May

When under stress, British PM Theresa May reportedly eats peanut butter straight from the jar. Crunch time is looming... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Politely Fake Political Obituaries (And The Paris Discord)

One unfortunate side effect of “personality politics” is that when prominent politicians die, the niceties we observe at the death of private individuals get automatically extended to them as well... More>>


Unique And Vanishing: NZ Biodiversity Losses Match Global Crisis

One might think that it is buffered from some of the effects of biological erosion, especially since people only arrived less than 800 years ago. But as we show, the impact on wildlife has been catastrophic. More>>

Your Name Here(ish): Sponsor A Section On! has just launched Section Sponsorships - the newest way for you to gain exposure for your brand to Scoop’s high value audience of 500,000 monthly readers. More>>


You Did It! The Scoop 3.0 PledgeMe Closes

Update: The Scoop 3.0 Crowdsale and Crowdfunding Campaign met its target with a total of $36,024 pledged. It looks like it has all been worthwhile. We are nearly there and will ride again in 2019, our 20th year of operations. Moreover the past week has brought a number of inquiries from larger organisations, many of which have till now failed to respond to our messages... More>>