Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Ardern reaffirms no WTO concern over PGF grants

Ardern reaffirms no WTO concern over Provincial Growth Fund grants

Jo Moir, Political Reporter

The prime minister says she hasn't seen anything that suggests the World Trade Organisation (WTO) is concerned the government is bringing in agricultural subsidies via the back door.

Prime Minister
Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has responded to questions about whether the Provincial Growth Fund could violate rules against subsidised agriculture. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King

The ACT Party and a leading economist have raised questions about whether the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) could violate rules against subsidised agriculture, which was phased out in New Zealand 30 years ago.

Jacinda Ardern said she had seen no advice the WTO was concerned about the way the $3 billion regional fund was being used and officials had been mindful of that when assessing each case.

"I've had advice that the PGF grants we've made do not sit counter to our trade agreements,'' she said.

But a leading economist said he was greatly concerned some of the grants could be breaching the rules.

The PGF is a $3b fund to bring development to provincial New Zealand over three years.

The risk of it proving an agricultural subsidy in drag surfaced in Parliament on Tuesday.

ACT leader David Seymour asked whether Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones had been advised that some of the fund expenditure might have to be reported to WTO, as a hidden subsidy.

Mr Jones replied that he had sought advice about this risk, but he laughed off any consequences.

"Naturally, advice has been sought from the Foreign Affairs Department," Mr Jones told Parliament.

"However, given that the adjudication and appeals [processes] of that international trade body are in a state of disarray, I am not bothered by that at all."

Mr Jones was referring to a looming crisis in the WTO's appeals processes, because the Trump administration is blocking new judges from being appointed to that role. This is thought likely to stymie new rulings by the WTO.

Mr Jones said he had been "counselled" by Economic Development and Trade Minister David Parker on several occasions.

"I am now much more aware of the importance of nuanced language, which will be a strange sensation for my good self. But obviously I'm one member of a broad team and international trade is our economic lifeline."

He went on to downplay his comments in the House in response to Mr Seymour's question about hidden subsidies.

"I would say though that political banter in Parliament should not be construed as a state of fact. There are some political attacks from the ACT Party that somehow we're undermining our good name with international trade rules. That's silly and that's foolish, but I accept these are matters of economic sensitivity,'' Mr Jones said.

"Just as regional New Zealand wants a champion, internationally New Zealand needs consistency and certainty about its ability to make money from trade."

The chief economist for The New Zealand Institute, Eric Crampton, said Mr Jones' initial approach suggests New Zealand could do what it liked.

"That's just terrifying, it can throw away a lot of the really good work we've had over the last decades from both National and Labour,'' he said.

When Ms Ardern was asked today whether Mr Jones' response was acceptable she reiterated her comments that she has had no advice the fund is in breach of any trade agreements.

"We do not believe that in any way that we have fallen afoul" - Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones duration 7:25
from Morning Report

Click a link to play audio (or right-click to download) in either
MP3 format or in OGG format.

Speaking to Morning Report earlier today, Mr Jones said he had taken advice from officials the entire time through the PGF process and he had "never once been advised that the things we're doing is imperilling the good name of New Zealand''.

He said he understood it was a political talking point but he had not fallen foul of the rules.

Mr Jones said he had a "very realistic view about the role of the WTO". While it was "incredibly important to our agri-business sector", he said he had a lot to do with it when he worked with the fisheries sector and he was "continually disappointed''.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Resignation Of Metiria Turei: Were Journalists 'just Doing Their Job'?

In our research we examined the role of journalism in animating the Turei controversy and the different perceptions of professional journalists and online commentators sympathetic to Turei’s left politics. ... More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Extradition Of Julian Assange

It isn’t necessary to like Julian Assange to think that his extradition to the US (on the charge of aiding and abetting Chelsea Manning) would be a major injustice... More>>


Gordon Campbell: Islamic State Meets The Searchers

The histories of the European children forcibly recruited into Native American tribal life during the 19th century do remind us of just how difficult the social re-integration of the children of ISIS is likely to be. More>>

Joseph Cederwall: CJR Analysis Of Post-Christchurch Media Coverage

After the Christchurch massacre, Columbia Journalism Review analysed news sources to see how outlets complied with guidelines from groups that seek to limit the amplification of terrorist acts through media. More>>

News Deserts: The Death March Of Local Journalism

Joseph Cederwall: The corporate media sector seems unable to do anything to halt the raging dumpster fire of consolidation, layoffs and centralisation of content production. All this means we are increasingly seeing ‘news deserts’ appearing in local communities. Illustration by Paul Sahre. More>>