Top Scoops

Book Reviews | Gordon Campbell | Scoop News | Wellington Scoop | Community Scoop | Search


Tax Cuts: How Much Would It Cost?

The Treasurer, Bill English, has announced that a future National Government would make it a priorirty to lower the business and top personal tax rate to 30 cents, while at the same time matching any cuts with increased social spending - dollar for dollar. The Scoop looks at how much a Government would need to fund such a promise.

Working out bottom line impacts on changes to tax rates is notoriously difficult because of the complex interactions in an economy and the changes themselves cause changes in behaviour, which in turn move the bottom line in unexpected ways.

For example, a decrease in personal income taxes has a direct effect on consumption and
thus on GST collections. These changes would flow on to affect business sales and hence company tax.

However for the sake of argument, Treasury does do stab-in-the-dark predictions on what small changes would have on government revenues

In the 1998/99 year, Treasury predicted a one-percentage-point change in the top individual rate would cost $105 million and a one per cent change to the company rate would cost $120 million

This estimate allows for effect on indirect taxes through changes in consumption and on direct tax through changes to company profits, but does not incorporate possible second round effects on wages and profits. Fiscally neutral changes in tax paid on benefits are excluded and the labour supply response is assumed to be zero in the short term.

Treasury would probably frown, but if we multiply this by three to get the Treasurer's hoped for fall of three per cent in the top rates we get a total of $675 million dollars required, double this to meet the dollar for dollar pledge and you get a total of $1,350 million extra required to fund National's pledge.

To go to the next stage, both the Treasurer and the Prime Minister have said such moves would be funded by economic growth.

The last Budget outlined three scenarios, the most optimistic had four per cent growth in real GDP in 2000 and 2001 and this would deliver a $1.7 billion operating balance surplus in 2000/2001. The central forecast would have a $1.5 billion surplus by 2001/2002. Under the weak recovery forecast the pledge could simply not be met.

Looking at the figures it is clear why both the Prime Minister and Jenny Shipley have added the rider - 'better than expected economic performance is required'.

© Scoop Media

Top Scoops Headlines


Commercial Scoop User? Help Scoop Survive (and Thrive!)

The ScoopPro licensing terms require that commercial users of pay a reasonable fee in order to access the Scoop site so that this same information remains free and accessible to the wider public regardless of their disposable income. More>>

Joseph Cederwall: Building a Community Newsroom

A combination of new technology, ideas, institutions and business models and a renewed energy and commitment by the Scoop team, means Scoop aims to be at the forefront of the development of this renaissance that we term ‘News 3.0’. More>>


Scoop 3.0: Saving The News

Scoop Co-Founder Alastair Thompson - One of the saddest aspects of the decline of the news industry, not just here in NZ - but everywhere, is that it often seems invisible, in large part because news is a confidence business... More>>


UK Cabinet Backs Deal: Gordon Campbell On The Latest Roll Of The Brexit Dice

Brexit has left the British public looking like a nation of Wellington bus commuters. In both cases, the unholy mess bears no resemblance to what people were promised or the spin being used to justify it. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Democratic Leadership And Trump

On the big picture, the poll predictions were dead right. In the end, the Democratic Party won a clear victory in the House, and lost as expected in the Senate, where it had been defending at least 10 seats in regions that had voted heavily for Trump in 2016. More>>


  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog