Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Green MP Keith Locke Speech Matrimonial Property

Green MP Keith Locke Speech notes for the

Matrimonial Property Amendment Bill May 4, 2000

I rise to speak as probably the member of this Parliament with the longest experience of a de facto relationship. I have been in a de facto relationship with my partner for over 20 years.

Before I go into the matter of de factos in detail, I wish to convey that every Green MP will be voting for this motion because it is a matter of principle for the Green Party that the Human Rights Act should apply to all legislation and all people regardless of their marital status or sexual orientation.

Without the bill today, we would be breaching the Human Rights Act in our legislation on property division at the time of a relationship breakdown. It is right to deal with it now, rather than wait until December 2001, when all our legislation is due to be consistent with the Human Rights Act.

The Greens strongly support the proposal to extend the law to include same sex and de facto relationships.

I would first like to explain why people like myself enter de facto relationships as a conscious choice. It is not because we are any less committed to each other. In fact, it is just the reverse. We want our relationship to be purely governed by love and concern for each other without the interference of legal processes and formal ceremonies.

In fact, sometimes the marriage law has sometimes been used to force people into loveless relationships.

The term "shotgun marriage" used to be very popular, meaning two young people being catapulted into marriage, often with extreme pressure from their families, because the young woman became pregnant.

And sometimes married couples who have lost affection for each other have stayed together longer than they should - sometimes because of the public stigma of divorce, sometimes because of the legal hurdles they have to jump to become divorced, which they shy away from. The combination of the public stigma and the legal hurdles put them off. It's just too hard.

I am not arguing for the superiority of either marriage or de facto relationships. I believe that people should have the choice of what suits them, and over 200,000 New Zealanders have chosen a de facto relationship.

And like my relationship, they are no less inherently solid than a marriage relation Or less spiritual, or anything else.

But I believe that in no sense is a long-term de facto relationship any weaker than a marriage relationship.

We de factos need the same protection for property division when the relationship breaks down. Sure, de facto couples can sign property division contracts, as can married couples.

But that doesn't overcome two problems: 1. First, that they can be unjust, often favouring the male partner or dominant earner. And it is no accident those de factos opposed to this bill are mainly male.

2. The reality that most de factos don't get around to signing a property agreement.

they don't want to waste money on it

there is always a reluctance to bring up the question, which may have the implication that the relationship may not last, or that there is some dimunition of love, and that preparations for a split are underway.

and any agreement is likely to date. That is the case with my relationship. We signed something inadequate years ago.

So I personally, and my partner have a vested interest in this bill, as do many, many de facto couples.

There are the appropriate qualifications in the bill, for example, that the asset division provision comes in after 3 years. And there are appropriate clauses to cover contracts with exceptional circumstances. I am thinking, for example, of the very late marriages, say 80 year olds, who still want their assets able to be passed onto their children.

However, the bill gets around the legal nightmares, where a de facto partner of decades standing could end up with nothing. And it also means that the very good provisions in the bill, where one's child-rearing status, disparities of income resulting from the breakup, and other injustices, usually to the female partner, are taken care of.

It is great that the bill proposes the same advantages for same sex couples as married and de facto couple.

This will not only be justice, but a huge step towards overcoming prejudice towards gay and lesbian couples.

Gay and lesbian couples still face other forms of discrimination in society.

Legislating their rights in this bill is a very good precedent.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On Trump’s Open White Nationalism

At one level, this has been the week that the Republican Party of Abraham Lincoln – which once led a civil war that ended the slave economy of the South – has now defined itself openly as being the party of white nationalism.

By telling those four elected, American born and/or raised women of colour to “go home”, US President Donald Trump’s racist agenda has come out of the shadows. More>>


RNZ: Trades Hall Bombing Case Re-Opened, Evidence Released

The cold case has been reopened and the police have recently revealed more details about the bomb's components - including that it was wrapped in a 1977 edition of The Evening Post. More>>

Safety: Govt Targets Fewer Deaths On The Road

“Most roads deaths and serious injuries are preventable and too many New Zealanders have lost their lives or been seriously injured in crashes that could have been prevented by road safety upgrades,” said Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter. More>>


Pay Rise Delay: Teachers Unions Plan Legal Action Against Novopay

Both of the teachers unions - NZEI and the PPTA - have confirmed they will be taking legal action against Novopay. More>>


Emission Statement: 'Consensus Reached' On Agriculture

Today the Government launched a consultation document, informed by the work of the Interim Climate Change Committee (ICCC), on how to bring agriculture into the emissions trading scheme, a key part of the Government’s plan to tackle climate change and reduce New Zealand’s emissions. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On What’s Wrong With Wellington

For many Wellingtonians, it hasn’t been the normal hardships – the workings of central government and the lousy weather – that have recently pushed their tolerance into the red zone. It has been the inability of local government to maintain even the basics. More>>


$1m Compensation Paid: First Gun Ban Event In Christchurch

The Police Minister says the first ever firearms collection event in Christchurch over the weekend was a huge success. But Stuart Nash had concerns about whether the participation reflected the number of weapons in the region. More>>


The Kids: Youth Parliament 2019 Event Kicks Off

120 Youth MPs and 20 Youth Press Gallery members have gathered in Wellington to attend the two-day Youth Parliament event ... More>>


Friends Like These: Foreign Minister To Visit USA

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will travel to Washington D.C. today for talks with senior members of the US Administration, and to attend the Ministerial to Advance Religious Freedom. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Aussie Banks’ Latest Fee Hike Excuse

When the Reserve Bank sought feedback on its plans to require the country’s major banks to raise their capital reserves then you might have expected the banks to whine and complain. And so they have. More>>





InfoPages News Channels