Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Tariff Amendment Bill –Second Reading

(Bill moved into the House by Finance Minister Michael Cullen)
TARIFF (ZERO DUTY REMOVAL) AMENDMENT BILL –
SECOND READING

Mr Speaker

I move, that the Tariff (Zero Duty Removal) Amendment Bill be now read for a second time.

This legislation halts a long series of unilateral tariff reductions culminating in the previous government's zero duty legislation of 1998. The coalition government rejects the unilateral rush to free trade embodied in the Tariff (Zero Duty) Amendment Act 1998. The policy now is based on balance and mutual benefit – with New Zealand’s best interests our number one priority; our only priority.

Unilateral tariff removal has made deep and significant cuts to New Zealand’s tariff levels. Most tariffs now are only about one-fifth of the levels of the late 1980s. We have also removed quantitative restrictions on imports, with import licensing generally ceasing in July 1998. New Zealand has become an extremely open market. Many other countries have much higher tariffs, and quota-type controls.

The Zero Duty Removal Bill will prevent the former government's planned reductions from July 2000 onwards. Tariffs in general will be held at current levels until July 2005. The only exceptions will be tariff removal under mutually beneficial agreements with our trading partners.

We became party to several “zero-for-zero” arrangements during the GATT Uruguay Round of trade negotiations (1986-94).

Our few pharmaceuticals tariffs were removed in 1996. The Government will remove beer tariffs by January 2002, and tariffs on paper/paper products and printed matter two years later. These commitments bring significant advantages for New Zealand exporters, since our major trading partners are mirroring New Zealand’s removal path.



This distinction between “unilateral disarmament” and the balanced approach of the Coalition will be readily apparent. Tariffs are a tax on imports. They can have a significant effect on domestic resource allocation and on levels of international competitiveness. Excessively high tariffs can create inward-looking economies which only benefit a narrow segment of the population.

This Government had no wish to fall into that trap. Levels of tariff protection on most imports are low – in the vicinity of six or seven percent. In general terms, only textiles, clothing, headgear, carpets and footwear pay higher tariffs than those modest general levels. Few economies are as open as ours.

The repeal legislation does not take us backward. Rather, the Government is allowing New Zealand to re-enter the international tariff mainstream.

Other countries do not take off their border taxes without asking for something in return. It is very difficult to find examples of across-the-board tariff removal of the type planned by the former government..

The legislation now before the House moves New Zealand into another form of policy framework. We now care very much about what the rest of the world does. We will now be influenced by the actions of our trading partners.

New Zealand is able to remove tariffs if reciprocal benefits are available. We will be good and responsible members of the international trading community. We will not take tariff benefits without giving in return. Sometimes tariff cuts may well be justifiable. Nothing in the repeal legislation prevents the Government from changing tariff levels as appropriate under the powers contained in the Tariff Act 1988. We are not constrained from taking tariff actions which can be shown to be clearly in New Zealand’s best interests.

I hope that my message is clear. We remain an open trading country. We continue to be ready to enter into mutually beneficial trade liberalisation arrangements with our trading partners. All that we ask is a good balance of benefits.

Our predecessors apparently thought that New Zealand’s rush to zero would trigger a sympathetic stampede of like-minded countries. There is no sign of such a phenomenon – and every sign that other countries plan to continue to take a cautious approach towards tariff removal.

This Government is moving to rejoin the tariff mainstream through the powers in this Bill. We are now in a much more considered policy environment. This Government’s tariff pause is a responsible action and a careful action. It will enable New Zealand producers to consolidate.
Quite simply, ever increasing competition is a reality. We cannot and will not go back to a distant dreamtime of impermeable border defences against imports. This Government is forward looking. It is not, however, disposed to shedding tariffs in advance of the rest of the world. The time has arrived for commonsense and a clear focus on the best interests of the nation. We are acting now, before New Zealand’s remaining tariffs disappear completely without sign of offsetting benefits for our people.

Thank you Mr Speaker.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

SCOOP COVERAGE: CHRISTCHURCH MOSQUES TERROR ATTACK


'Public Safety': Next Firearms Reform Plan Announced

The next Arms Amendment Bill will:

• Establish a register of firearms and licence holders to be rolled out over 5 years
• Tighten the rules to get and keep a firearms licence
• Tighten the rules for gun dealers to get and keep a licence
• Require licences to be renewed every five years
• Introduce a new system of warning flags so Police can intervene and seek improvement if they have concerns about a licence holder’s behaviour
• Prohibit visitors to New Zealand from buying a gun... More>>

 

Gordon Campbell: On Being Australia's Pacific Go-Fers

Inevitably, there was an aspect of ‘what might have been’ about the weekend’s meeting in Canberra between PM Jacinda Ardern and her Australian counterpart, Scott Morrison... More>>

ALSO:

RNZ: Trades Hall Bombing Case Re-Opened, Evidence Released

The cold case has been reopened and the police have recently revealed more details about the bomb's components - including that it was wrapped in a 1977 edition of The Evening Post. More>>

Safety: Govt Targets Fewer Deaths On The Road

“Most roads deaths and serious injuries are preventable and too many New Zealanders have lost their lives or been seriously injured in crashes that could have been prevented by road safety upgrades,” said Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter. More>>

ALSO:

Pay Rise Delay: Teachers Unions Plan Legal Action Against Novopay

Both of the teachers unions - NZEI and the PPTA - have confirmed they will be taking legal action against Novopay. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On What’s Wrong With Wellington

For many Wellingtonians, it hasn’t been the normal hardships – the workings of central government and the lousy weather – that have recently pushed their tolerance into the red zone. It has been the inability of local government to maintain even the basics. More>>

ALSO:

Emission Statement: 'Consensus Reached' On Agriculture

Today the Government launched a consultation document, informed by the work of the Interim Climate Change Committee (ICCC), on how to bring agriculture into the emissions trading scheme, a key part of the Government’s plan to tackle climate change and reduce New Zealand’s emissions. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels