Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Tariff Amendment Bill –Second Reading

(Bill moved into the House by Finance Minister Michael Cullen)
TARIFF (ZERO DUTY REMOVAL) AMENDMENT BILL –
SECOND READING

Mr Speaker

I move, that the Tariff (Zero Duty Removal) Amendment Bill be now read for a second time.

This legislation halts a long series of unilateral tariff reductions culminating in the previous government's zero duty legislation of 1998. The coalition government rejects the unilateral rush to free trade embodied in the Tariff (Zero Duty) Amendment Act 1998. The policy now is based on balance and mutual benefit – with New Zealand’s best interests our number one priority; our only priority.

Unilateral tariff removal has made deep and significant cuts to New Zealand’s tariff levels. Most tariffs now are only about one-fifth of the levels of the late 1980s. We have also removed quantitative restrictions on imports, with import licensing generally ceasing in July 1998. New Zealand has become an extremely open market. Many other countries have much higher tariffs, and quota-type controls.

The Zero Duty Removal Bill will prevent the former government's planned reductions from July 2000 onwards. Tariffs in general will be held at current levels until July 2005. The only exceptions will be tariff removal under mutually beneficial agreements with our trading partners.

We became party to several “zero-for-zero” arrangements during the GATT Uruguay Round of trade negotiations (1986-94).

Our few pharmaceuticals tariffs were removed in 1996. The Government will remove beer tariffs by January 2002, and tariffs on paper/paper products and printed matter two years later. These commitments bring significant advantages for New Zealand exporters, since our major trading partners are mirroring New Zealand’s removal path.

This distinction between “unilateral disarmament” and the balanced approach of the Coalition will be readily apparent. Tariffs are a tax on imports. They can have a significant effect on domestic resource allocation and on levels of international competitiveness. Excessively high tariffs can create inward-looking economies which only benefit a narrow segment of the population.

This Government had no wish to fall into that trap. Levels of tariff protection on most imports are low – in the vicinity of six or seven percent. In general terms, only textiles, clothing, headgear, carpets and footwear pay higher tariffs than those modest general levels. Few economies are as open as ours.

The repeal legislation does not take us backward. Rather, the Government is allowing New Zealand to re-enter the international tariff mainstream.

Other countries do not take off their border taxes without asking for something in return. It is very difficult to find examples of across-the-board tariff removal of the type planned by the former government..

The legislation now before the House moves New Zealand into another form of policy framework. We now care very much about what the rest of the world does. We will now be influenced by the actions of our trading partners.

New Zealand is able to remove tariffs if reciprocal benefits are available. We will be good and responsible members of the international trading community. We will not take tariff benefits without giving in return. Sometimes tariff cuts may well be justifiable. Nothing in the repeal legislation prevents the Government from changing tariff levels as appropriate under the powers contained in the Tariff Act 1988. We are not constrained from taking tariff actions which can be shown to be clearly in New Zealand’s best interests.

I hope that my message is clear. We remain an open trading country. We continue to be ready to enter into mutually beneficial trade liberalisation arrangements with our trading partners. All that we ask is a good balance of benefits.

Our predecessors apparently thought that New Zealand’s rush to zero would trigger a sympathetic stampede of like-minded countries. There is no sign of such a phenomenon – and every sign that other countries plan to continue to take a cautious approach towards tariff removal.

This Government is moving to rejoin the tariff mainstream through the powers in this Bill. We are now in a much more considered policy environment. This Government’s tariff pause is a responsible action and a careful action. It will enable New Zealand producers to consolidate.
Quite simply, ever increasing competition is a reality. We cannot and will not go back to a distant dreamtime of impermeable border defences against imports. This Government is forward looking. It is not, however, disposed to shedding tariffs in advance of the rest of the world. The time has arrived for commonsense and a clear focus on the best interests of the nation. We are acting now, before New Zealand’s remaining tariffs disappear completely without sign of offsetting benefits for our people.

Thank you Mr Speaker.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>

ALSO:

More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news