Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Liz Gordon Speech On Tertiary Education

EMBARGOED AGAINST DELIVERY

ISSUES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION RESOURCING AND
THE ROLE OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE INQUIRY


Dr. Liz Gordon M.P.
Alliance education spokesperson
Chairperson, Education and Science Select Committee

Speech to Youth Summit, Wellington.
Friday 25 August 2000 at 1 p.m.


Good afternoon,

I would like to begin by congratulating the Minister of Youth Affairs, Laila Harre, for organising this gathering along with students’ organisations.

There is no issue more important for our young people, and indeed for the future well-being of our nation, than the issue of student debt and the high cost of tertiary education.

From my point of view, this is turning out to be a fascinating year in the struggle for a fair and just system of tertiary education resourcing in New Zealand.

Let me give you just a few examples of things which have happened this year that challenge and undermine the expensive and unsustainable structures of tertiary education that we currently have in place.

At the beginning of the year the government, led by Alliance party concerns, decided to depart for the first time from a pure market-led system of setting interest rates on existing student loans. The Treasury advised the government to increase the rate of interest on loans to 7.6%, on the basis of movements in various indices. The government declined and fixed the rate at 7% for the upcoming year.

At the beginning of May, the world went mad. Wyatt Creech who, as Minister of Education, had sneered at the Alliance’s policies, said that National might support universal student allowances. The system of means testing on parental income until a person was 25 years of old was unfair he said. Pity it took so long for him to come to that opinion, but also indicative of a welcome change in thinking.

A third event was the announcement by Massey University, in the same month, that it intended to lay off a large number of permanent academic staff and cut programmes. A falling roll had taken its toll on the expansionist ambitions of that institution. This event confirmed to us that the end point of the market system of tertiary education was a rationalisation of courses, a decline in quality and an increase in costs.

A fourth event was the long-awaited report of the Audit Department of government on the student loan scheme. I had not actually expected much from the report, but its results were stunning. Apart from the well-publicised fact that loan debt would grow to $20 billion and that its social and economic effects had barely been researched, there was another aspect to the report which vindicated something I had been saying for years: the student loan asset held by the government is an uncertain and wobbly asset, and much student loan debt may never be paid off.

It should not have taken the Audit Office so long to see this. When one lends thousands to 70 year olds to write their Masters thesis, and to people with severe intellectual disabilities to allow them to participate in ‘skills for living’ courses at polytechs, one cannot really expect the money back.

There is increasing evidence that women who earn the average female professional pay and who take time off to have and raise children will, as a group, have major difficulties in paying off their loans. Perhaps it is time the government stopped positioning loan debt as an asset and saw it instead as a liability.

Finally, a few days ago, was the extremely interesting proposal that state sector hospitals be allowed to include student loan repayments as part of a salary package for junior doctors.

It is very important that we understand the mechanisms of this. The state, in giving out loans for fees, is paying to itself an amount as an asset. By charging interest on the loan debt, it is increasing that asset. Then, in paying back the sum of loan, plus interest, plus compounding increments, the state may end up paying out far more than the original cost of the fees and expenses it loaned. The state has paid dearly in gaining only a few years’ delay in shelling out education money.

Bad as this is, it is not the key issue in this debate. Far more important is the precedent set in the public sector as a whole.

Where do people go when they graduate? Well, some go overseas and some work in the private sector. But most graduates in New Zealand eventually enter public sector employment.

If we are to set a precedent by providing loan repayment for junior doctors, then are not nurses, police officers, judges, teachers, social workers, lecturers, policy analysts and kindergarten workers equally as deserving?

What exactly would happen to the state sector pay bill if loan repayments became a general tool to solve recruitment and retention problems? It would soar, and what we would have is a displaced system of free education.

So issues around tertiary education keep boiling to the surface, because the underlying injustices and inequities of the system have become so blatantly apparent in this ninth year of the loan scheme.

When the Tertiary Education Advisory Commission was set up by the government earlier in the year, resourcing matters were barely on the agenda of that body. Instead, the government asked the Education and Science Select Committee to examine issues around student loans.

The terms of reference of the committee ended up somewhat wider than fees, loans, and allowances, however, and included the brain drain, course selection, sustainability of the present system, quality/cost analysis and a catch-all “other matters”.

Submissions have now closed for the Inquiry and the Committee will start hearing them in a few weeks time. The issues raised in the submissions are complex and fascinating. I am not allowed to tell you what is in them while they are being considered by the committee, but I can assure you that they question every aspect of the current system of resourcing tertiary education.

Everyone knows that something has to be done.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them.

Finally, yesterday’s announcement by the Ardern government that a new state agency will be set up to assess and plan the manned re-entry to the mine (on a set timetable) goes a long way to meeting the families’ remaining request: that they be enabled, if at all possible, to bury their loved ones. More>>

 

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election