Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


R&D Backgrounder

In response to a variety of requests here is a simplified backgrounder: What is the problem?

Businesses want to be able to claim 100% of their Research and Development (R&D) costs as a deduction in their tax returns. At the moment most businesses are claiming this 100% but the rules are very unclear and the penalties for getting it wrong are very high.

Businesses would like the government to provide more certainty. Some businesses argue that they should be able to claim over 100% deductions, that is, they could get more than $1 of deduction for every $1 spent. What are the rules?

R&D is a continuum of activity covering research, development and getting the product into market.

 Research expenditure is usually deductible for tax purposes.
 Development expenditure is usually not deductible for tax purposes. In this case, the expenditure is capitalised, that is, it is treated as an asset in the balance sheet.
 Marketing costs are deductible. In order to ensure that they have maximised their immediate deductions, businesses tend to define all (or most) of their costs as research or marketing. They put as little as possible into the development category.

What is the black hole? If a capital asset has been created it is usually possible to claim depreciation, that is , claim the expenditure as a deduction over a period of years rather than in one chunk in the year it was incurred.

If this is the case, then there is a delay in the deduction being claimed but it is a timing difference not a permanent difference. A "black hole" is a term used to describe development expenditure which is not deductible but which does not get capitalised to a depreciable asset.

Such expenditure will never be deductible because it does not qualify for an immediate deduction and there will never be a claim for depreciation. Obviously businesses try to minimise the amount of expenditure falling into black holes.

What is the Labour/Alliance government proposal? Labour/Alliance are not proposing to allow 100% deductibility. Mallard has 'pre-announced' that they are going to require businesses to use the same rules for accounting and tax purposes.

If something is deducted for their accounts then it will be able to be deducted for tax purposes. But if it has been capitalised for their accounts then this is the way it must be treated for tax purposes.

This means that the rules set out by the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICANZ) become the rules for tax. This policy is different from Labour's pre-election promise of 100% deductibility for R&D. It is also different from the Budget announcements of Government grants for R&D.

What is wrong with this proposal?
 The proposal lacks certainty as the ICANZ rules may be very hard to apply to specific situations. This uncertainty is risky because of the high tax penalties for getting it wrong.
 Many taxpayers will be forced to reduce their deductions under this rule. Accounting standards (and the taxpayer's bank) require conservative treatment, that is, "if in doubt don't". They will not be able to claim 100% as at present because this is not what they are doing in their accounts.


Annabel Young MP
National Party Spokesperson on Revenue National Party List MP responsible for Wellington Central and Rongotai
Do you want to be added to my tax email group?
Have a look at my tax web-site http://www.tax.org.nz


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news