Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Singapore agreement debate and vote speech notes

Hon. Jim Sutton


Singapore Closer Economic Partnership agreement debate and vote speech notes

Mr Speaker, I believe the agreement represents an excellent opportunity for New Zealand and I recommend that the House support it.

This agreement will put our trade, economic and investment relationship with Singapore, one of the most dynamic Asian economies, on a new and firmer footing. The agreement, based on a modern and forward-looking body of trade rules, will provide for more secure and open access for New Zealand exports of goods and services to that market.

It will deliver immediate benefits and these will grow over time. The Agreement we will put in place a new comprehensive partnership with Singapore with provisions on services, investment, competition policy, government procurement, customs co-operation, the reductionof technical barriers and compliance costs for business.

All remaining tariffs will be eliminated reciprocally on entry into force. This means Singapore will remove its high tariffs on New Zealand beer exports.

In return, New Zealand will eliminate all tariffs on goods of Singapore origin - although I note that New Zealand already accords duty free treatment to over 95% of imports from Singapore.

A new provision is the 40% ex factory cost threshold which will determine origin of goods for tariff preference. This is a valuable precedent. It sets a new benchmark which will assist our export effort.

The Agreement sets a new standard by comprehensively outlawing export subsidies on all goods including agricultural products. Let our other trading partners in Europe and North America take note!

Trade in services will be progressively liberalised. Services generate 80 per cent of all New Zealand jobs, creating $8 billion in exports. The export of services is an increasingly important dimension of NZ's international trade profile.

There will be improved access for NZ services exporters to a wide range of Singapore's services sectors including: telecommunications, financial, educational, engineering and architecture services. Singapore provides a shop window for NZ to sell its services further abroad. A new provision to deal with recognition of qualifications will assist New Zealand services exporters to access Singapore.

The provisions to address technical, sanitary and phytosanitary barriers to trade will reduce compliance costs. We will have more secure access to the Singapore government procurement market. Our respective investment regimes will be made transparent and more certain. Barriers to investment will be gradually eliminated.

In short, the Agreement is good news for New Zealand; it will encourage trade in goods and services, promote investment, create jobs especially in service industries, and assist our economic development.

Importantly as well, the CEP sends a very positive signal to our other Asian trading partners about our willingness to engage with them.

Conversely, failure to ratify this Agreement would send a very negative signal and be seriously prejudicial to our trade and economic interests generally.

Let me now comment on some of the criticisms that are being levelled, misguidedly, against this Agreement.

We are told that as a result of the CEP the NZ textile, clothing and footwear industries will 'simply disappear'. This is rubbish and irresponsible scare-mongering.

Singapore is not a significant producer and exporter of these items.There will be no explosion of imports from Singapore after the agreement comes into effect. Less than 0.3% of our total textiles, clothing and footwear imports come from Singapore, and accordingly the impact on our protected industries from tariff elimination (for Singapore alone, NOT the whole world as some seem to believe) will be minimal.

There has been a lot of loose comment about imports from low wage processing zones such as those in Indonesia, taking an unintended advantage of the CEP's tariff preferences.

The Agreement provides that the New Zealand Customs Service will be able to prevent circumvention or fraud so that third countries do not derive an unintended benefit from the elimination of tariffs. Unless ourCustoms is satisfied as to origin, the concession will not apply.

I note, Mr Speaker, that the Customs Service provided an assurance to the Select Committee that the integrity of its verification and monitoring process can be maintained and that the Select Committee will, over the first two years, receive six monthly reports on verification and enforcement of the rules.

Another criticism is that Singapore might set up a private University here and remit the profits overseas. Actually there is nothing to stop an overseas University doing that today - they don't need a CEP to do so - but if they did, they still have to adhere to NZ rules and regulations.

What are the critics afraid of? Competition? From courses that NZ students will want to attend? Let's be clear - the CEP does not oblige NZ to extend state subsidies to private Singaporean institutions.

And what about regional and local government. The Select Committee's report notes that the CEP 'has no direct impact on local government under NZ law'. The CEP doesn't prevent regional and local governments from buying locally if they wish - it provides only that a NZ Government cannot force them to buy locally. So where is the problem?

And sovereignty? The claim that we are renouncing our sovereignty by negotiating the CEP is rubbish. NZ is party to hundreds of international trade, economic, environmental, labour and other treaties which impose rights and obligations on us. We have signed up to them because successive governments have concluded that they are in our interests. We can withdraw from them in the future in the unlikely event we decide they are not in our interests.

Far from undermining our sovereignty, our membership of such agreements enables us to have a voice in the international community, to advance and protect our national interests. They make us stronger, more independent, self confident and prosperous.

The CEP is a bilateral Agreement. Any other agreements which New Zealand might seek to enter into will be negotiated separately, with fresh negotiating mandates from the Government. But of course, the CEP with Singapore is available as a model. Others can sign up to it should they wish, provided they have our and Singapore's approval.

Most of us realise we can do better and be more productive when we concentrate on what we do best. It's the same for countries. But we have to do that through trade.

The CEP Agreement will send a positive signal to our business community about this Government's commitment to prise open export markets and promote economic growth.

I would encourage the House to indicate its support for the Agreement, in order that we can complete our approval processes, and pass the necessary amending legislation, so this historic CEP between New Zealand and Singapore can enter into force on 1 January 2001.

Office of Hon Jim Sutton


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Dealing Crackdown, Addiction Support: Government Action On Synthetics

The NZ Drug Foundation has welcomed the Government’s response to synthetic drug deaths. The response strikes a balance between giving law enforcement the tools they need to target criminal networks and changing drug law to make it easier for people to access help when they need it. More>>

ALSO:

Strategy Committee Unanimous: Wellington To Forge Ahead With Convention Centre

The three-storey Cable Street building, with around 18,000-square metres of floor space, will comfortably be able to host 1500 people for conventions. It includes a 1651sq m exhibition area that will attract international exhibitions too big for nearby Te Papa and provide an always-changing visitor attraction. More>>

ALSO:

Surveying The Surveillance: First IGIS Review Of Warrants Under New Act

The report sets out the Inspector-General’s interpretation of the new warrant provisions under the ISA and her expectations of the GCSB and NZSIS when they prepare warrant applications. More>>

SSC: 2018 Public Service Workforce Data Published

State Services Commissioner Peter Hughes has published the 2018 Our People, Public Service Workforce Data , which shows the Public Service is making significant progress in important areas. More>>

ALSO:

Sinking Cap: Auctions, Permanent Forests, Added To ETS

The move to auctions, signalled in an August consultation paper, will help put a cap on the number of emission units available over time. Annual announcements, looking forward five years, will help provide certainty for scheme participants, she said. More>>

ALSO:

Joint Select Committee Report: Achieving Smokefree 2025

In a historic first for select committees, the Māori Affairs Committee and the Health Committee presented their joint report on achieving the Smokefree 2025 goal to the House on Tuesday, 11 December 2018. More>>

"Shared Interests And Democratic Values": Peters To Visit USA

Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will travel to Washington D.C. for talks with US Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo and other senior members of the US Administration. More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels