Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


United States urged to take prompt action

New Zealand expected the United States to remove restrictions on New Zealand and Australian lamb imports without delay, Trade Negotiations Minister Jim Sutton said today.

The United States has notified the World Trade Organisation that it would implement the recent WTO ruling which found United States safeguard tariffs on New Zealand lamb imports illegal, but it requested a reasonable period of time to consider its options.

Mr Sutton warned that New Zealand expects the United States, in considering its options, to respect the rules of the WTO.

"The decision was clear and comprehensive. In our view the United States has no other option but to terminate the restrictions on our lamb exports, which have been in place for almost two years now."

The WTO ruled last month that United States safeguard measures on exports of New Zealand and Australian lamb meat were illegal. The United States is permitted to determine how it will bring the measure into conformity with the rules of the WTO, and to have a reasonable period of time to do so. Exactly how long the US will have to implement the ruling will be the subject of negotiations between the United States, New Zealand, and Australia over the next few weeks.

"Failure of the United States to implement the ruling properly and in a timely manner would leave us little option but to consider further action in the WTO to ensure full and proper implementation of the ruling," Mr Sutton said.

Under WTO rules, New Zealand is able to enforce compliance through further dispute settlement proceedings if, in New Zealand's view, the United States fails to meet its obligation of full implementation.

MEDIA BACKGROUND PAPER

The United States introduced a safeguard measure on lamb in July 1999, following a determination by the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) that imports of lamb meat from New Zealand and Australia were threatening to cause serious injury to US sheep farmers and the lamb meat industry.

The measure took the form of a tariff rate quota (TRQ) imposing additional tariffs and a quota on lamb meat exported from New Zealand and Australia. The measure was imposed for three years (July 1999 - July 2002), with the possibility of extension for a further five years.

It is estimated that the costs of the US measure to New Zealand's lamb industry so far are approaching NZ$20 million. The value of NZ's lamb exports to the US in 2000 was approximately NZ$188 million.

New Zealand and Australia initiated proceedings under the WTO's dispute settlement provisions in October 1999.

In December 2000 the WTO Panel hearing the dispute ruled in New Zealand's and Australia's favour. The United States appealed the Panel's ruling, and in May 2001 the Appellate Body ruled comprehensively in favour of New Zealand and Australia. The Appellate Body ruling was adopted by the WTO on 16 May.

Under WTO rules, the US was required to notify its intentions regarding implementation of the lamb decision by mid-June. The US has now indicated that it intends to implement the WTO ruling in a manner that respects its WTO obligations, and that it has begun to evaluate options for doing so. The US indicated it would need a reasonable period of time in which to do this. Exactly how long the US will have to implement the ruling will be the subject of negotiations between the US, New Zealand, and Australia over the next few weeks.

The US is permitted, in the first instance, to determine how it will bring the measure into conformity with the rules of the WTO. The primary question for the US is whether to remove the measure, or whether it can modify the measure so that it conforms to the WTO ruling. The US Trade Representative is able, under US law, to refer the latter question to the ITC for advice. The New Zealand Government has not been advised that a decision to do so has been taken.

New Zealand's view is that, in light of the comprehensive nature of the ruling in this case, that the US has no option but to remove the measure. If New Zealand does not consider that the US has properly implemented the decision, New Zealand is able to enforce compliance through further accelerated dispute settlement proceedings.

ENDS.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news