Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Child Support Amendment Bill first reading

21 June 2001 Speech Notes

Child Support Amendment Bill first reading

I move that the Child Support Amendment Bill be now read a first time.

Following the first reading, I will move that the bill be referred to the Social Services Committee for consideration and that the committee present a final report on the bill on or before Monday 27 August. It is necessary for the bill to be passed by October 2001 to enable the Inland Revenue Department to do the work leading to the issue of assessments for the child support year beginning 1 April 2002.

Mr Speaker, the underlying principle of the child support scheme is that parents are financially responsible for their children, whether or not they live together. And the level of support provided by liable parents should be in proportion to their income.

This bill reinforces those principles by adjusting two key thresholds in the scheme, the level of the minimum child support payment and the upper level of income for which a liable parent can be assessed.

The current minimum rate of child support is $520 a year, or $10 a week. This rate was set in 1990 and has not been increased since then. It is the amount paid by about 79,000 low-income liable parents.

The bill proposes to restore the original value of the minimum child support payment by raising it to $663 a year, or $12.75 a week. This increase reflects movements in the Consumer Price Index from 1990 to that expected by April 2002, when the amendment will take effect.

Mr Speaker, it is important that all parents to the best of their ability accept their responsibilities towards their children, and to recognise that these rates have not increased for over a decade.

A complementary amendment raises the level of investment income allowed to liable parents who are long-time hospital patients or prisoners, who are exempted from paying child support if they meet certain income criteria. That investment income threshold increases from $10 a week to $12.75 a week, in line with the increase in the minimum payment.

In the future, both the minimum payment and the income investment threshold will be linked to the Consumer Price Index, and adjusted annually, to maintain relativity.

Mr Speaker, at the other end of the spectrum, the maximum level of income for assessment purposes is twice the yearly equivalent of the average ordinary-time weekly wage. This currently works out at $67,461 a year.

The bill proposes to raise that maximum income level to two and a half times the yearly equivalent of the average ordinary-time wage. This will raise the maximum income level for assessment purposes to $84,461 a year.

The result is that liable parents earning more than the current maximum will make a greater contribution to their children's financial support. It is estimated that about 3,200 liable parents will be affected. The effect of the change will vary according to the number of children involved and the liable parent's present domestic situation.

As a rough guide, however, someone who lives alone, pays child support for two children, and earns $75,000 gross a year will pay an extra $149 a month in child support. Someone in the same circumstances who earns $85,000 gross will pay an extra $338 a month.

The amendment will apply from 1 April next year.

Mr Speaker, the bill also introduces a number of minor remedial amendments relating to end-of-year assessment issues. Their purpose is to ensure that the original policy intent is reflected in the legislation, and that the legislation works effectively, to the benefit of all concerned. These amendments apply from 1 April 2001, but any liable parents who have objected to incorrect assessments before the date of the bill’s introduction will have their reassessments protected.

I commend the Child Support Amendment Bill to the House.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them.

Finally, yesterday’s announcement by the Ardern government that a new state agency will be set up to assess and plan the manned re-entry to the mine (on a set timetable) goes a long way to meeting the families’ remaining request: that they be enabled, if at all possible, to bury their loved ones. More>>

 

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election