Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Conflict Between Name Suppression Law and Bill

Conflict Between Name Suppression Law and Victim's Bill

Friday, August 24 2001
Stephen Franks
Press Releases -- Justice, Law & Order


The Victims' Rights Bill should stop the courts using a popular excuse for name suppression, says ACT Justice spokesman Stephen Franks. The Bill was reported back by the Justice and Electoral Select Committee last night.

"In the past the courts have abetted the efforts of officials and politicians to slide dangerous criminals back into defenceless communities, by suppressing release details.

"Some victims at least will now have the right to be told of the expected date of release. And as a result of ACT pressure in the Select Committee, they will know the conditions of parole.

"In theory this should largely end the practice of suppressing details of offenders in case it complicates plans to 'rehabilitate' them in 'the community'. If the victim has to know, surely it defeats the argument that the offender's interest in secrecy outweighs the community's right to know.

"But we could not persuade the Government to deal with more serious concerns of victims.

"There is no duty to warn a victim when a paroled prisoner has breached terms and conditions of parole, for example by failing to report. Kylie Jones' murderer, Hotene, had not reported to his probation officer for some time yet no effective steps were taken.

"Desperate probation officers have told me that breaches of parole and of other non-custodial sentences are rife - with little effective sanctioning.

"There is a new right to be informed of the escape of a criminal and to be told if a criminal is charged for a breach. But the government refused to ensure the victim was warned as soon as a prisoner breached a parole condition, even if the condition related to the safety or security of the victim.

"When most parole breaches go completely unpunished, the first a victim may know about the offender thumbing his nose at the law again, could be when the face looms through the window or the safety latch is being burst off.

"The government said rules more effective would be too big a burden. 'We won't necessarily know when conditions are breached as our record keeping only shows up convictions'. Another argument was: 'What is the point when the victim doesn't have an involvement in the punishment for these parole breach offences anyway?'

"The bill gives a right to be informed when a dangerous mental patient escapes, but no right to be consulted about whether and on what conditions, they should be let out. And in response to fears of mad people out on leave, the Bill says the victim is to be told only about the 'first unescorted leave of absence'.

"Mr Goff's Ministry of Justice officials were obdurate - even against ACT's of a wider duty to warn whenever there was good reason to expect the victim to be concerned because of the nature of the crime or the parole breach.

"ACT's Criminal Justice policy will ensure that victims' interests are the central issue in criminal justice," Stephen Franks said.

For more information visit ACT online at http://www.act.org.nz or contact the ACT Parliamentary Office at act@parliament.govt.nz.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Corrections Corrected: Supreme Court Rules On Release Dates

Corrections has always followed the lawful rulings of the Court in its calculation of sentence release dates. On four previous occasions, the Court of Appeal had upheld Corrections’ practices in calculating pre-sentence detention. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news