Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Life will mean Life under National

Bill English National Party Leader

29 January 2002

Life will mean Life under National

A life sentence will mean life for the worst offenders under a National Government, Opposition Leader Bill English announced today.

"At the last election 92% of voters called for tougher sentences for violent criminals. Helen Clark has ignored that message.

"The new law will be based upon the New South Wales model, which defines certain murders as so extreme that they justify special punishment. Judges will be given guidelines, and the new standard would catch about two or three cases a year in New Zealand.

"It is not difficult to pick out the criminals who would fit this criteria. Murderers like Gresham Marsh, who killed two elderly people in their beds in 1994; Paul Dally, who tortured and murdered Karla Cardno; and the killer of the two young girls in Masterton recently.

"New Zealanders feel less safe after the recent spate of murders, and our communities never will be truly safe if the worst murderers are allowed out of prison after serving only a fraction of their sentence. If these people are locked away they can never hurt anyone again.

"Labour's Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill extends the period of non-parole by only seven years. This is not good enough. The public is looking to law makers for decisive action and National will provide that leadership," Mr English said.

Ends

LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE

Some Questions and Answers on the Proposed Law

Q Why introduce life without parole for the worst murderers?

A The murder rate has increased from 40 in 1981 to 56 in 2000. This has resulted in increased public demand that forthright action be taken to express our revulsion at this trend, particularly in respect of the worst murders.

Q Who will the penalty of life without parole apply to?

A The penalty will typically apply to murderers where there are multiple victims, where the crime is a second offence or the murderer has a history of violent offending, or where the murder has been committed in particularly cruel and depraved circumstances.

Q What is the definition of the worst murders?

A The Judge would have to look at the following factors:

(a) multiplicity of killing (b) unusual level of premeditation (c) whether the murderer had previous convictions for homicide (d) whether the murderer had a history of sexual and/or violent offending (e) whether the murder had particularly serious levels of cruelty or torture (f) whether the murder involved the killing of a police officer in the course of duty (g) whether the murder involved unlawful entry into a home.

If one or more of these factors are present, the murderer would expect to receive life without parole.

Q How many murderers would be expected to receive the sentence of life without parole?

A On the basis of the New South Wales law, and on the New Zealand murder rates, approximately two to five murderers would receive this sentence each year.

Q Surely this means that some people would still be in jail at age 80, when they would not be a danger?

A There would be provision for discretionary release towards the end of a prisoner's life, as is the case with the New South Wales law. In New South Wales this is a Ministerial decision, not a Parole Board decision.

Q Doesn't the Sentencing and Parole Reform Bill increase the murder penalty for the worst murderers to a minimum of 17 years?

A Yes, but it will not prevent the worst murderers being released back into society, to commit further crime, and is an affront to the victims' families. For instance, a murderer who kills at age 25 can be released at age 42, still a fit, healthy and potentially dangerous individual.

Q Isn't this proposal too harsh?

A It is based on the New South Wales legislation introduced in 1995. Since that time 17 murderers have received the sentence. They are typically multiple murderers, premeditated murders, and extremely violent murders.

Q How does New Zealand's murder rate compare to that in other countries?

A The rate per 100,000 population (1997) is:


New Zealand 2.37
Australia 1.93
United Kingdom 1.92
Canada 1.91
United States 7.34


On this basis, two to five murderers would be sentenced each year to life without parole.

Q Why not give the jury a role in determining who these murderers are?

A That would introduce a major change to the law, and would require the jury to do two things - determine guilt or innocence, and determine the severity of the crime. This step would not be in accordance with Commonwealth legal tradition.

Q Should the law of murder be thoroughly revised?

A The Law Society has recommended a thorough review of the law of homicide including self defence, provocation, responsibility and sentencing. The Law Commission has suggested changes to the law of self defence and diminished responsibility. The law of homicide should have an overall review, but there is a need for these changes now in advance of a wider review.


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>

ALSO:

More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news