Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Government Considering Appeal

A High Court decision released today has found that aspects of the previous government’s Special Education 2000 policy are inconsistent with the Education Act.

The court action, known as the Daniels’ case, was taken against the Crown in 1999 by a group of parents of special needs children.

The government is now considering its options following today’s decision, Associate Education Minister Lianne Dalziel said.

“Our concern is that the Judge did not confine his decision to special education, and his judgment has potentially serious ramifications for the education system generally. For that reason, the government must consider the option of appeal,” Lianne Dalziel said.

“This decision goes to the heart of the entire education system. It could compromise the education needs of all children by diverting precious resources away from them into a Wellington-based bureaucracy focussing on assessment.”

The Daniels’ case challenged the previous government’s Special Education 2000 policy. The case was put on hold while the present government reviewed certain aspects of the policy. The Wylie Report was received in July 2000, and the government acted on its key concerns resulting in a number of changes to the policy.

Justice Baragwanath acknowledged this in his decision: ‘There is no doubt that the developments have been significant’.

“The overall decision could reverse the momentum behind the establishment of the new Learning Support Network following the integration of SES within the Ministry of Education. Research is also underway on therapy provision for students with physical disabilities, with a scoping report due to be released within two weeks. We have also been developing funding mechanisms targeting magnet schools,” Lianne Dalziel said.

“The difficulty for government now is that we cannot ignore the serious implications of this decision - the implementation of which could take us backwards. Nobody wants a return to the previously haphazard and inconsistent funding system, and this decision raises serious questions, that may need the ruling of a higher court.

“I do feel for the parents of children who have been waiting for a decision on this case for many months. However, the court has not ruled on the circumstances of the individual plaintiffs which the judge may deal with in a further hearing to be held soon. I wish parents to know that the far-reaching implications of the decision leave me with no choice but to consider an appeal.”

Ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election