Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


What Have The Greens Done?

Last week's stand by the Green MPs in rejecting the vote on the HSNO bill and re-stating our opposition to the lifting of the GE moratorium in 2003 has generated much heated debate in media and political circles. However, the heat has often produced more smoke than light. This brief question-and-answer paper should correct some of the more extreme misconceptions being aired.

The Greens broke their "no surprises" agreement with the Government by abstaining on the HSNO vote.

The Green Party has always, explicitly and unambiguously stated its complete opposition to the commercial release of GE organisms. In what way did our abstention on the bill come as a "surprise" to the Government? In October 2001, Jeanette Fitzsimons personally informed Helen Clark that the Green Party "couldn't support a Government that took New Zealand further down the GE road." That message was spelled out again a month later in Jeanette's speech to the EcoPolitics conference in Christchurch. Again in April, when the HSNO bill was reported back to Parliament, Jeanette sent a public message that the Government was "on a collision course" with us over its intention to end the moratorium in October, 2003. Finally, the Government was officially told one hour before the vote that the Green MPs would be abstaining.

The Greens utter opposition to GE in any form would condemn New Zealand agriculture to the dark ages.

The Green Party is not opposed to gene technology, per se. We recognise that it can play a useful role in medical and agricultural research and in the production of new medicines. What we do say is "keep it in the lab." The current process of moving genes between species produces organisms that are unstable and unpredictable. There will be unplanned and unwanted side effects which means they should be kept out of our food and our environment. Because of this safety aspect, and the potential for accidental "spread," we would also prefer that field trials were not undertaken. However, field trials have occurred permissible in this country for years and we acknowledge that in the foreseeable future we do not have the power to stop them. The one, single aspect of GE that we cannot accept is the release of GE crops, animals and micro-organisms into the environment. As for New Zealand being "left behind," a moratorium on new GE release has been in place in the EU for the last three years.

The GE ultimatum proves the Greens are a single-issue party.

Opposition to commercial GE release is but one of a full raft of policies promoted by the Green Party, ranging from education to justice to trade to environment and beyond. The point is that progress towards all our other policies can be achieved through negotiation and debate. Release of GE into our environment is not open to negotiation: after October 2003 the lid comes off Pandora's Box and no amount of negotiation and debate can ever put the contents back inside.

The Greens have little support and their attempt to dictate GE policy is anti-democratic and a classic example of the "tail wagging the dog."

Polls over the last year have consistently shown well over half of respondents are either opposed to GE being taken out of the lab or want further proof of its safety. The Greens are the only political party that represents their views. Furthermore, we are happy to put that support to the ultimate test by campaigning on this issue at the general election. Rather than being "anti-democratic" we want the voters to decide this issue. If we get enough support, we believe Labour will be forced to listen to us.

The Green stand is a strategy for Italian-style "perpetual election."

The Greens in Parliament have consistently proved a stable and reliable supporter of the Labour Government. The Green Party gave a commitment to support this Government for its term on confidence and supply and it should be remembered that we have honoured that commitment. But for that Green support, this Government would not have had the numbers to continue. We have now signalled that in the next turn of Parliament our support is conditional on the Government maintaining the moratorium on GE release. If this brands us as a perpetual "force of instability" then che sera sera. (Incidentally, despite numerous reshufflings of coalition partners, Italy has had only 19 elections since the Second World War, New Zealand has had 18.)

The Greens have no right to bring down the Government.

Any political party has a duty to uphold its core principles, otherwise it betrays those principles, its members and the voters who put it into Parliament. It is illogical to argue that the Greens are somehow "unique" in threatening to vote against the Government. National and ACT and sometimes New Zealand First vote regularly against the Government on confidence and supply, precisely because their core principles are at variance with those of Labour. If they were to find themselves in a position to force an early election, would they then have "no right" to vote the Government down? If the Government were to fall, it would be because Labour was not willing to shift its "bottom line" over the lifting of the moratorium.

The Government is promising the "strictest regime in the world" when the moratorium is lifted, so there's no problem.

As widespread contamination overseas shows, it is impossible to contain GE crops once they are planted. Seed and pollen will spread and replicate - that's their job. You can have a "strict regime" for contained field tests, but release is irreversible and completely uncontained. The Royal Commission identified many urgent questions that need to be answered before commercial release goes ahead - including horizontal gene transfer (the non-sexual swapping of genes) and effects on soils and on native species. There is no way the research programme that the Government has put in place can be done properly by October 2003.

Ends


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news