Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Goff Reading: Pitcairn Trials Bill third reading

Pitcairn Trials Bill third reading


I move, that the Pitcairn Trials Bill be now read a third time.

The Bill gives effect to an Agreement which came about after the United Kingdom asked whether New Zealand would be prepared to let Pitcairn courts sit here.

An important consideration in the New Zealand Government’s response to this request was the interests of justice for any New Zealand-based complainants and accused. A significant proportion of both groups I understand are likely to be resident in this country.

I am surprised at the opposition of New Zealand First and The Greens who purport to regard concerns of victims as paramount. The charges likely to be laid in this matter are apparently not about cultural practices regarding the age of consent. Proposed charges according to the Pitcairn’s Prosecutor would be at the serious end of offending, including the alleged multiple rape of an eight year old.

The Bill puts in place the legal framework that is needed for Pitcairn Courts to conduct their trials on New Zealand soil.

It deals, in particular, with the relationship between Pitcairn and New Zealand law. If the Pitcairn courts sit here it does not mean that their proceedings are justiciable in the New Zealand courts. Anyone who wants to challenge Pitcairn proceedings must do so under Pitcairn law in the usual way.

Certain immunities and privileges are given to the Pitcairn courts and those associated with them, such as judges, so that the courts can function independently.

The Bill also deals with various practical matters.

Ÿ It adapts extradition procedures so that a Pitcairn accused who is in New Zealand can be transferred directly to the court premises;

Ÿ It allows Pitcairn accused to be held in New Zealand prisons. They can also be released on bail if certain conditions are met;

Ÿ It allows limited purpose permits to be issued under the Immigration Act for people who need to come to New Zealand for the trials.

Pitcairn sentence or hospital orders can be enforced in New Zealand if the Minister of Justice agrees. They are then treated in essentially the same way as a corresponding New Zealand sentence or order.

All costs, including those of imprisonment in a New Zealand prison, are to be borne by the United Kingdom.

The Pitcairn arrangement is limited in nature and probably unique. Once the specified trials are over, the UK may ask for other Pitcairn trials to be held here. But this is on a case-by-case basis only and there is no obligation to agree.

A particular concern raised in submissions was that holding trials in New Zealand might precipitate Pitcairn’s demise.

There are certainly difficulties in reconciling the longer term need to deal with the issue of Pitcairn’s future and the shorter term need to bring alleged serious offenders to justice without any further delay.

The first issue is a matter for the UK and Pitcairn to resolve under the auspices of the UN decolonisation process. In that regard the UK Government assured the select committee of its commitment to Pitcairn’s future.

The second issue is something with which New Zealand can assist by allowing trials to take place here. This is consistent with our general commitment to the rule of law and the principle that alleged serious offenders should be brought to justice.

Many submitters took the view that if there are to be trials, rather than a truth and reconciliation process, those trials should be held on Pitcairn.

While trials are generally held in the place where the offending occurs, this is not an invariable rule.

The UK authorities have had to plan for a range of possible scenarios. As part of that process facilities on the Island have recently been upgraded. Even so, the UK told the select committee that holding every aspect of a series of defended trials on the Island would still present significant practical difficulties.

This bill is therefore facilitative: it will ensure that there is no impediment in New Zealand law to New Zealand being a venue option. But it is also important to note what the Bill does not do:

Ÿ it does not require all Pitcairn trials to be held in New Zealand;

Ÿ it does not require all Pitcairn-based accused to be transferred to New Zealand;

Ÿ it does not give authority for Pitcairn trials to be held by video-link.

These are all matters for the Pitcairn courts and for Pitcairn law. For example, if a change of venue is sought in a particular case, the accused will be able to be heard on the issue so the Pitcairn court can decide where the interests of justice lie. Its decision will be appealable.

It may be that, within a particular trial, some parts of the proceedings could be held on Pitcairn and some in New Zealand. There is no particular difficulty for example in holding pre-trial challenges or appeals here. These involve primarily legal argument and do not generally require the presence of the accused.

What will happen in the trials themselves depends on the evidence presented and on Pitcairn law. The Pitcairn and UK justice systems embody the same sort of human rights standards as our own. We expect that the Pitcairn courts will guard those rights closely, as our own courts do.

Providing the option of an alternate venue helps to clear the way for Pitcairn justice to take its course at an early date. This is in the interests of complainants and alleged offenders and will, in turn, allow Pitcairn itself to move forward.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods ( is the dollar up or down? ) last night’s outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country..>>>More


Reaction

Labour on its agreement |Peters: Post-Election Announcement Speech | Greenpeace “cautiously hopeful” about new Government | ACT - Madman on the loose | E tū ecstatic | Chamber welcomes the outcome | Greens on their joining Govt | EDS welcomes new govt | Immigrant groups worry | Feds ready to engage new coalition government | Labour Ministers of the Crown announced

 

Climate: Increasing Greenhouse Emissions Hit NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate…More>>

ALSO:


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>

ALSO:

Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>

ALSO:

Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>

ALSO:

Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>

ALSO:

Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>

ALSO:

Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election