Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

"Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics"...


"Lies, Damn Lies and Statistics"...and the HLFS Employment Figures

Weekly Column by Dr Muriel Newman

While the Labour Government lauds the low unemployment figures published in this week's Household Labour Force Survey (HLFS), there remain serious concerns about the accuracy of these statistics. Scrutiny of the long-term unemployment figures provides justification for these concerns.

According to the HLFS, 5,400 people have been unemployed for more than two years. Yet answers to my Parliamentary Questions show there are 42,400 persons currently receiving the unemployment benefit who have been on a benefit for over two years. The HLFS has effectively undercounted 37,000 unemployed New Zealanders.

It gets even worse. While the HLFS has identified 98,000 people who are unemployed, the Minister's own answers state 122,697 people are currently receiving the unemployment benefit. Using these figures, the unemployment rate increases from the claimed 4.9 percent to an actual 6.2 percent.

The reason for the discrepancy is the methodology of the HLFS - the way the statistics are collected. The Household Labour Force Survey, adopted by the 1985 Labour Government, is run under the auspices of the Geneva-based International Labour Organisation (ILO). Some 13,000 households are surveyed over a three-month period and the results extrapolated for the country.

According to the HLFS survey, to be categorised as being officially unemployed, the respondent must fit three criteria: 1. They must have done no paid work at all in the survey week. 2. They must have actively looked for work within the previous four weeks 3. They must be ready to start work within a week Each of these criteria exclude many people who see themselves as unemployed - such as a person who has been on the Dole for years but worked for one hour in the survey week, say baby-sitting for a neighbour. As a result of working just one hour, this person will not be counted as unemployed, even though he clearly cannot support himself on one hour's pay.

Similarly, someone who has been on the unemployment benefit for five years, but lives on the East Coast and has given up looking for work will not be counted as being unemployed. Nor will someone who has no job, wants a job and has been actively looking for work, but is not available to start work within the survey week. The HLFS counts anyone who is on the Dole but has worked for as little as one hour in the week, as employed; unemployed people who are no longer seeking work or who are not available to take a job straight away are not counted as unemployed, but are instead "jobless."

The December HLFS identified 172,600 "jobless" New Zealanders. Of these, 95,275 were categorised as officially unemployed. Adding these 95,275 (unemployed) "jobless" New Zealanders to the 98,000 people the HLFS classed as unemployed increases the unemployment rate from the 4.9 percent the Government claims, to 9.7 percent. Given that there are still almost 400,000 working-aged New Zealanders on state benefits, a 9.7 percent unemployment rate is much more accurate.

The concern that the HLFS understates the true rate of unemployment - by making a Government look good but diminishing the importance of unemployment as an economic and social problem has been raised by the head of the Australian Bureau of Statistics. He suggested that ten hours of paid work a week may be a more realistic measure of employment. Replacing a one-hour-a-week paid work criteria with ten-hours-a-week would effectively double the unemployment rate.

Other countries have become disillusioned with using the misleading HLFS, and are replacing it with more accurate methods. Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Denmark and Luxembourg all now use measures based in full or in part on their unemployment register. Those that also use an "hours worked" criteria, have set it not at one hour a week but a more realistic 10 to 15 hours a week.

It is long past time for New Zealand to follow the international lead and adopt a more accurate measure of unemployment. I have been campaigning on this issue for some years, and as a result of exposing the anomalies of the HLFS, the Government has finally been forced to admit that the measure has failings - although that clearly doesn't stop them from gloating when their figures look good.

As Deputy Chairman of the Social Services Select Committee I am pressing for the committee to carry out an inquiry into unemployment statistics in order to recommend Government uses a more honest and accurate method.

Long term dependency on welfare is a major problem for New Zealand - the fact we have gone from 28 full-time workers to every full-time beneficiary just 30 years ago to four workers to every beneficiary today demonstrates the magnitude of our welfare dependency problem. The underreporting of unemployment by the HLFS prevents a national focus on this problem and as a result does the country a disservice.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Veronika Meduna: The Kaikoura Rebuild

A Scoop Foundation Investigation

Friday will be a big day for people north of Kaikōura – and for hundreds of construction workers who are racing to reopen State Highway 1 in time for the holiday season.

By the afternoon, the South Island’s main transport corridor will be open to traffic again, more than a year after a magnitude 7.8 earthquake mangled bridges and tunnels, twisted rail tracks and buried sections of the road under massive landslides. More>>

 

BPS HYEFU WYSIWYG: Labour's Budget Plans, Families Package

“Today we are announcing the full details of the Government’s Families Package. This is paid for by rejecting National’s tax cuts and instead targeting spending at those who need it most. It will lift 88,000 children out of poverty by 2021." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Defence Spending, Alabama, And Dolly Parton

The spending lavished on Defence projects to meet the risks that could maybe, possibly, theoretically face New Zealand in future is breath-taking, given how successive governments have been reluctant to spend even a fraction of those amounts on the nation’s actual social needs. More>>

ALSO:

Members' Bills: End Of Life Choice Bill Passes First Reading

The End of Life Choice Bill in the name of David Seymour has been sent to a select committee for consideration by 76 votes to 44. It is the third time Parliament has voted on the issue in recent decades and the first time such a Bill has made it over the first hurdle. More>>

ALSO:

State Sector: MPI Survives Defrag Of Portfolios

The Ministry for Primary Industries will not be split under the new government, but will instead serve as an overarching body for four portfolio-based entities focused on fisheries, forestry, biosecurity and food safety. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Vulnerable Kids, RNZ Funding, And Poppy

The decision to remove the word ‘vulnerable’ from the Ministry for Vulnerable Children could well mark a whole shift in approach to the care of children in need... More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages