Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


NZers Must Decide If Privy Council Stays or Goes

New Zealanders Should Decide Whether Privy Council Stays or Goes

ACT is promoting a cross party movement of MPs to press for a referendum on the abolition of our rights of appeal to the Privy Council. ACT Justice Spokesman Stephen Franks today wrote to political parties asking for their support for a citizens-initiated referendum on the issue.

"ACT is sponsoring Mr Dennis Gates' application, but we want it to be a multi-party process. The outcome of such a referendum is not the main point at this stage - giving the ultimate decision to the people is most important," Mr Franks said.

"A referendum is a matter of elementary respect for the people. Our constitution is the property of the people of New Zealand, not of politicians to change and tinker with as they wish. All politicians should uphold and develop a protective convention against significant constitutional changes without a very clear mandate from New Zealanders.

"The separation of powers between the Judiciary and the Executive is important. If the Executive can use its voting strength in Parliament to change Courts when they like, the separation looks like a sham. A core function of our Courts is to protect citizens against abuses of Government power. Courts should not appear to exist at the whim of a bare majority in Parliament. It is quite wrong for a government to use its voting power, and the power to buy the votes of other parties, to abolish the Privy Council.

"MPs can endorse the constitutional principle across party lines. ACT will also have an amendment to make a referendum a requirement of the Supreme Court Bill itself. The commencement date of the Bill would be deferred until after that referendum. That vote would supersede Mr Gates' citizen's initiated referendum petition.

"Either way a referendum will provide a clear mandate for any constitutional change. It will confer authority on a new Supreme Court of New Zealand if we decide to abolish our right of appeal to the Privy Council. Without that mandate any new court will be seen as a creature of the ruling party.

"National's Spokesman Richard Worth last night told the Wellington District Law Society National would repeal the Supreme Court Bill if Ms Wilson forces it through. ACT would support that if it were feasible, if the people have not endorsed it, but it is highly undesirable for our top Court to be in such a position. The referendum is imperative to ensure our top Court is not a political football," Mr Franks said.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them.

Finally, yesterday’s announcement by the Ardern government that a new state agency will be set up to assess and plan the manned re-entry to the mine (on a set timetable) goes a long way to meeting the families’ remaining request: that they be enabled, if at all possible, to bury their loved ones. More>>


Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election