Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Teen Pregnancy: Who Is Accountable?


Teen Pregnancy: Who Is Accountable?


Weekly Column by Dr Muriel Newman


Many people were shocked by the recent revelation that 28 boys, all under the age of 16 – the youngest being 12 years old – had fathered children and were being charged child support.


While many might think it fair to force these boys to contribute to the financial support of their child, the situation does raise a number of important issues.


The first question is who should be responsible for financial support when a young girl becomes pregnant and decides to keep her baby – should it be the girl, her family, the boy, his family, or the taxpayer?
In the past, most young girls who became pregnant adopted their babies out – in some cases, to their wider family. Just 30 years ago, more than 3,000 babies were offered up for adoption. Today that number has dropped to only a few hundred.


Before the advent of the Domestic Purposes Benefit, in the Seventies, working women pregnant out of wedlock were supported by the state during their last stages of pregnancy and first three months after the baby’s birth – or six months if she was breastfeeding. If she wasn’t working, her family supported her. As a result, the number of such births remained low for decades.


However, the liberalisation of divorce, medical advancements increasing women’s control over their fertility, and the introduction of the DPB meant that, during the late 1960s and early 1970s, the trend began to change.


The DPB was originally designed to provide an income for women, with children, to enable them to leave violent relationships. It then became widely available to women who chose to separate or to have a baby on their own – the only requirements were that she didn’t work, didn’t marry and didn’t allow the father contact with his child for more than 40 percent of the time. As a result, New Zealand now leads the OECD in single parent families, fatherlessness and teenage pregnancy.


The reason so many people are seriously concerned about teenage pregnancy is that, in public policy, you get what you pay for. The DPB has a lot to offer a teenage girl without a qualification: a secure income that pays more than a job, more money for each additional child and, if she wants to go on to university, free education.
Most teenage girls who receive the DPB stay on it for years. Now, as a result of the Government’s recent changes – supported by United Future – allowing mothers to receive the benefit until her youngest child is 18, a teenage mother could well be on that benefit for life.


Parenting is arguably life’s most important challenge. Government research shows children can be seriously disadvantaged if their parent/s take on that responsibility without emotional and financial stability. Children from unstable, benefit-led families all too often end up in state care, contributing to the seven percent annual growth in the number of children taken from their families by the Department of Child, Youth and Family – up from 2,500 in 1996 to 4,500 last year.


I believe that our present system, which encourages vulnerable young girls – who are often from unstable fatherless families, and are little more than children themselves – to have and keep their babies, is doing the baby, the girl, and society a huge disservice; and that is not to mention the enormous cost to the taxpayer.

I would like to see such pregnant girls counselled more strongly about the choice of adopting the baby out – especially since open adoption, which is inclusive of birth parents, is now very common.


In some countries the problem has been tackled by returning the responsibility for teenage mothers back to parents. The girl’s parents are required to support her, helped by the father of the child, and his parents if he is still dependent. If the girl’s family is unable or unwilling to support her, then state care is provided in a special hostel where she receives adult supervision and assistance.


The young mother must also complete her schooling, since a mother’s lack of education is recognised as a key risk factor for children. Education is also a key to her doing well in the workforce, as she will be expected to become the breadwinner for her family.


Instead of the present system, which sees so many New Zealand babies raised in situations where they are at serious disadvantage and risk, we must discourage early parenting until our young people have finished their education and are in stable relationships. Further, we should look to emulate the approach above, ensuring that young people understand the need to take personal responsibility for their fertility, and that they appreciate the consequences of parenthood – including the significant financial liabilities.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news