Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Gangs Gaining the Upper Hand

Gangs Gaining the Upper Hand

By Muriel Newman

Last week’s rival gang shooting in the Bay of Plenty reminded New Zealanders of just how dangerous criminal gangs are.

Most people are deeply concerned about the existence of gangs, and worry that – not only are they are a law unto themselves but – since many gang members are on benefits, taxpayers are essentially funding organised crime.

Police have also expressed alarm, saying that they are losing the battle against organised crime throughout the country: “the legacy of this government is going to be the era in which organised crime got out of control”.

Answers to my Parliamentary Questions show that there are an estimated 21,000 gang members and affiliates. That means that gang associates outnumber sworn police officers three to one. It has further been estimated that up to 80 percent of all crime is gang-related.

Police say one of the major reasons New Zealand’s gang problem is now getting out of control is that they are turning their attention from violent crime and traditional turf wars – like that seen last week – to the extremely lucrative business of manufacturing and distributing methamphetamines. Gangs that were once bitter enemies are now forming nationwide links. They are dealing in methamphetamine and – with the new law changes – prostitution, which provides a convenient way to launder drug money as well.

The people of Taneatua called for a crackdown on gangs. With political will, hard policing and some legislative tweaking, it would not be impossible to virtually rid New Zealand of criminal gangs.

The New York Police Department demonstrated how a zero tolerance approach to crime could be successful during the period 1992-2001, when crime plummeted by 65 percent. It was achieved by essentially cracking down on petty crime, repeat offenders, and those creating a public nuisance.

A first step was to increase police numbers to create a visible police presence, especially in crime hotspots. To lift New Zealand to the same level of police as the average in the US, we would need an additional 4,000 officers; 2,500 to match the UK and 1,700 to match Australia.

But more police was only part of the answer. Credit has largely been attributed to the development of a tracking system – Compstat – that displayed neighbourhood crime figures on a daily basis to produce trend data.

As New York’s mayor of put it: “if you could count it, you could ‘Compstat’ it”. Whether it was arrest information, response times, or gang intelligence, police district management teams were asked to front up twice a week to explain their results – if they were good, they shared how they had achieved them; if they were bad, they explained how they would improve them.

Overall, by having the staff, the resources and the mandate to significantly reduce crime, the city, streets and parks were eventually safe enough to be returned to the people, and New York was transformed from one of the world’s most dangerous large cities to one of the safest.

It is long past time to reverse Labour’s cuts in the percentage of funding they spend on police, by giving them the personnel, resources and mandate to eliminate gang crime.

In taking a zero tolerance approach, police would first need to enforce the law: the Crimes Act prohibits participation in an organised criminal group, punishable by up to five years in prison. Under the Summary Offences Act, it is an offence to associate with known criminals where it can reasonably be inferred that the association will lead to the criminal activity. These two Acts both prohibit unlawful assembly. The Proceeds of Crimes Act and the Misuse of Drugs Act provide for the confiscation of cash and property that has been obtained through criminal activity.

By properly enforcing these laws, the police could crack down on gangs to the extent that if members of criminal gangs – wearing their colours – gathered together in an intimidating manner, they could risk being arrested. Not only that, but if they were a beneficiary and could not explain how they lawfully obtained the $40,000 needed to buy their Harley Davidson, they could have it confiscated. Under such tough policing, the appeal of being publicly engaged in gang activities would surely wane.

Hand-in-hand with a zero tolerance approach by police should be tougher requirements to benefit entitlement. It irks law-abiding citizens that gang members can receive taxpayer-funded benefits while being engaged in a life of crime.

Benefits for people who are able to work should be based on a 40-hour a week programme of activity designed to increase their employability. That should apply to gang members as well. If they are not prepared to comply with those requirements, then that is their choice and, they should lose their benefit entitlements to become voluntarily unemployed.

While most New Zealanders would welcome a police crackdown on criminal gangs, Labour appears to be more interested in cracking down on motorists who drive just over the speed limit. I think it’s time they changed their priorities and adopted a zero tolerance approach to gang crime instead.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news