Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Muriel Newman MP Column - The Harsh Reality

Muriel Newman MP Column - The Harsh Reality


In the mid 1800s, Henry David Thoreau said, “Men are born to succeed, not fail”. That is as true today as it was back them. In almost any area of enterprise, success is the name of the game.

Before being involved in politics, I used to think that this applied to governments as well. I believed that the major scorecard of success should be the OECD living standards benchmark since, when I was young, New Zealand ranked number three, behind the US and Canada.

I believed that a government had a responsibility to run a country in such a way as to improve the lives of its citizens, enabling them to achieve their potential by maximising their opportunities.

To achieve that purpose, I thought a government should prioritise strategies to improve national productivity and prosperity. By doing that I felt that, not only would families do better but, it would help a country afford world-class health and education systems, effective police and defence forces, properly resourced infrastructure, and a social security system that ensured support for those who genuinely needed it.

How wrong I was. If we look objectively at New Zealand’s position – now number 21 out of the 30 OECD countries – it is clear that all is not well. Productivity is declining – not only due to a growing debilitating compliance cost burden on small businesses, but also to a union-controlled education system which does not always focus on success.

Further, the excessive tax burden on working families – including $9 billion dollars of stealth taxes introduced by a Labour Government that promised no tax increases – is holding us back, as is the welfare system that has enticed almost one working age adult in four to be reliant on benefits for their income.

Having now had the privilege of being elected to Parliament and being able to participate in the legislative process, I am horrified to find that the ‘good of the country’ is rarely considered in the development of this Government’s law-making agenda. The reality is that the parties holding the reins of power either seek to maximise political support by providing benefits to interest groups in exchange for votes, or they use their power to protect themselves from harm.

Take the recent debacle over the save Harry Duynhoven bill – the Electoral (Vacancies) Amendment Bill – passed under urgency last week. Labour changed a law that had been freshly scrutinised and amended in the last Parliament, in order to prevent potential embarrassment in a by-election.

Governments know that voters use by-elections to send ruling parties a message – without the danger of causing a change in government. National lost both Rangitikei and East Coast Bays to Social Credit in by-elections in 1978 and 1980. In 1985 Labour lost its safe Timaru seat to National, and in the 1998 Taranaki-King Country by-election, National almost lost Jim Bolger’s blue chip seat to ACT, it’s 10,223 majority being cut to 988.

In this case, facing an electorate worried about Maori foreshore and seabed ownership, escalating rates and stupid farting taxes, even Harry had to admit that Labour would have “taken a hammering”. As a result, they decided to use their Parliamentary majority to manipulate the law to save them from widespread humiliation and falling poll ratings once their political agenda came under close public scrutiny.

New Zealanders all around the country will now be starting to feel the fallout from Labour’s agenda in a variety of different ways. I recently received a letter from my local council outlining their draft urban growth strategy: “To be an accessible green city, where people can live, work and shop in safe and clean surrounds, where art and culture are celebrated, and leisure opportunities abound”. If this is not a pure payback to the Green Party for its support of the Government in the last Parliament, I don’t know what is.

The Kyoto Protocol, which Labour and the Greens have imposed on us, has been described as a global socialist scheme to redistribute wealth from more prosperous nations to those less prosperous. Our Prime Minister – who people are saying aspires to be the next head of the UN – is a driving force. Another Green Party payback, Kyoto will cost the country dearly – through loss of property rights, increased compliance costs and taxes, and the inevitable rise in consumer prices as those caught by this madness attempt to pass the costs on.

Labour’s blatant vote catching agenda, does not come cheap. Its “closing the gaps” strategy – designed to secure the Maori vote – has been estimated to cost taxpayers around $7 billion a year. That money is being spent on ill-defined Maori initiatives – such as ‘capacity building in the community’ – that are difficult to measure, and lack robust accountability standards.

At the present time, Parliament is dealing with a dreadful bill, which the government – seeing an opportunity to gain political credit for responding to a dreadfully vicious dog attack on a child – introduced in an effort to gain popular support. The Bill essentially classifies all dogs as dangerous and all owners as irresponsible. Under the proposed law, dogs will need micro-chip implants, owners will need to build expensive fences to create a secure pathway to their house for meter-readers, visitors and burglars – defeating the real reason why many people own a dog – and ratepayers will have to foot the bill for the hundreds of millions of dollars local authorities have estimated it will cost to enforce the new law.

The problem for New Zealand is that, rather than putting it’s effort into coming up with some solutions to lift our standard of living back up the OECD table, the Government is firmly focussed on holding power at the next election. Changing that focus to what is in the best interest of the country would be a welcome, if unlikely, development.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods (is the dollar up or down?) the outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country... More>>

ALSO:

.

 
 

Submissions Summary: The People's Commission On Public Media

This Summary is a preliminary report from the People’s Commission. It brings together views and aspirations of the hundreds of people who made submissions, attended public meetings, filled out the online survey and made speeches to our Panel. More>>

Housing Plans: Protest Over Ihumatao Development

Ihumatao in Mangere, next to the airport in Auckland, holds the archaeological remains of 1000 years of food production; from when Maori first landed in the area, through to early European settler agriculture and right up until today. More>>

ALSO:

Negotiations: What Does Winston Peters Want His Legacy To Be?

A lot of people in New Zealand seem to resent Winston Peters and the power that he appears to have. “Appears” being the operative word.. More>>

ALSO:

Contains Highly Colloquial Language: Your F**king Guide To Government Formation

The following message is in no way endorsed by the Electoral Commission. They are f**king done with this election. More>>

NZ Emissions Up 50% 1990-2013: Report Confirms CLimate Change Impacting NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate. More>>

ALSO:

Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>

ALSO:

Rorschach Restructuring: Inland Revenue Steps Back From Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election