Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Foreshore And Seabed Letter To Dr Michael Cullen

Foreshore And Seabed Letter To Dr Michael Cullen

Thursday 21 Aug 2003 Richard Prebble Other -- Treaty of Waitangi & Maori Affairs

Hon Dr Michael Cullen

Deputy Prime Minister

Parliament Buildings

Wellington

21 August 2003

Dear Dr Cullen

Re: Foreshore and seabed issue

The media has asked me whether ACT will support the Labour Government's proposed legislation on the foreshore and seabed.

I have replied that ACT has not been able to make definitive decision because the Government announcement is in political language and uses words not in the Oxford Dictionary. Legally, the proposals are gobbledygook. No lawyer could have written the press releases.

I am writing seeking clarification and further information.

In particular, I would like to know how you define the term "public domain"?

What does the Government mean by the phrase "Maori Customary Rights"?

Let me set out what, I think, the Government has announced, and you can tell me if I am right. If I am mistaken, how?

The legal situation today.

1. The Crown owns the seabed and the foreshore, except where there are Torrens titles e.g. some wharves, riparian rights, where the foreshore has advanced onto what was land etc - less than 1% of the foreshore.

2. Maori have a few traditional shellfish and fishing areas recognized under the Sealord fishing settlement. Maori are among the larger holders of such land. Maori have a form of control over shellfish and fishing areas recognized under Fisheries law and some Treaty settlements.

3. The Court of Appeal has said Maori can take claims for new titles based on customary use of foreshore and seabed.

4. Today Maori have not established any such legal title to either the foreshore or the seabed.

Labour is legislating, so it follows that Government is changing the status quo.

The Government's Proposal

1. The Crown is giving up its ownership of the foreshore and seabed.

2. The Maori Land Court is to be empowered to grant to iwi and hapu customary rights over the seabed and foreshore - everything, short of fee-simple title and the ability to block public access to the foreshore. Therefore no one owns the foreshore and seabed.

3. Customary rights can include the power to control, licence and receive rent from commercial uses of the seabed and foreshore.

4. Maori will also be able to claim mineral rights to the seabed and foreshore. The Crown claim to own mineral rights arises from the Crown's ultimate ownership of all land, which the Crown is now surrendering of the seabed and foreshore. One effect of the Crown giving up seabed ownership will mean that minerals not claimed by Maori will be able to be claimed by anyone.

5. Indeed, the only restriction of any Maori property rights is that the public will still have access to the beach.

6. The process of working out which Maori claims will succeed has no end date, so other New Zealanders' rights in those areas will be in limbo for years (decades if the normal timetable of the Maori Land Court and the Waitangi Tribunal is a guide).

As Maori claim to have never sought to stop the public from going to the beach, this seems a total victory for Maori. This is no doubt the reason why the Labour Maori caucus is supporting the Government policy.

Is my analysis correct?

Please regard this as an Official Information Act request.

Could I have all documents from officials advising on these issues?

I formally request a briefing by officials for the ACT caucus. I note that the Government has been willing to brief a number of groups in the community so it seems reasonable to me for the Government to provide a detailed briefing for MPs who request it.

Yours sincerely

Hon Richard Prebble CBE

Leader, ACT New Zealand

For more information visit ACT online at http://www.act.org.nz or contact the ACT Parliamentary Office at act@parliament.govt.nz.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news