Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Review announced for Wairoa schools


Review announced for Wairoa schools

Education Minister Trevor Mallard announced today a review of Wairoa schools aimed at ensuring that sustainable quality education will continue to be delivered to local students well into the future.

"I urge people to get actively involved in this process. This review is an opportunity for schools, their communities, parents and boards to contribute to the future shape of local education," Trevor Mallard said.

"If there is substantial change to the local network of schools, it will also result in considerable amounts of money being ploughed back into schools for the benefit of the whole community.

"Wairoa is facing a significant decline in the number of school-aged children. Now is an opportune time to ensure that local schools are stable, well-staffed and meet Maori educational needs.

"Surplus capacity in the schools under review is running to about 1104 surplus student places and about 32 surplus classrooms. By 2006 the area is expected to see a roll decline of about 8 per cent.

"This review is a chance for everyone to share ideas and work together to determine the best way to ensure their schools provide a quality education that is sustainable well into the future.

"We need to make sure education resources are spent on teaching children, and not on maintaining underused or empty buildings," Trevor Mallard said.

The schools involved in the review are: Ardkeen School, Frasertown School, Hillneath School, Kokako School, Kotemaori School, Mohaka School, North Clyde School, Nuhaka School, Ohuka School, Opoutama School, Putere School, Raupunga School, Ruakituri School, Te Mahia School, Te Reinga School, Tiniroto School, Te Kura Kaupapa Maori O Ngati Kahunguna O Te Wairoa, Tuai School, Tukemokihi School, Turiroa School, Wairoa College, Wairoa Primary School and Whakaki School.

A review starts with the Ministry of Education naming facilitators and a community reference group being formed. They then work through a process with all concerned parties to assess the future options for local education.

"The review process is expected to take around nine months to ensure that there is adequate community consultation and that I receive the best possible information and advice on which to make my final decision.

"I will visit the review area again to meet and listen to the views of the school communities at some stage during this process.

"The Ministry of Education will work closely with schools to make sure their requirements for a smooth changeover are met and that changes resulting from the review are implemented in time for the 2005 school year," Trevor Mallard said.

Questions and answers are attached. For more information: www.minedu.govt.nz

BACKGROUND TO NETWORK REVIEWS

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is a network review?

A network review is a process undertaken by the Ministry of Education and directed by the Education Minister. A review assesses the way education is currently being provided in a particular area and what re-organisation is needed to make sure a high quality of education can be provided for the next 10-15 years.

How do review areas get chosen? The reasons for choosing to review a particular cluster of schools vary depending on the local situation. Any issue that presents a risk to providing quality education that could be resolved or partly resolved by a re-organisation could indicate the need for a review. Situations that may generate a network review are:

· Suggestions for change from one or more schools;

· Resources not being fully utilised;

· Falling rolls;

· A significant number of small schools in close proximity;

· Concerns over the quality of education being provided;

· A desire to find more effective ways of meeting the diversity of student needs; and

· In some instances growing rolls could generate a network review, to decide which combination of schools best meets the needs of a growing population.

What schools are involved?

State schools, kura and wharekura can be part of a network review. Integrated schools may involve themselves in network reviews but it is not possible to make changes to integrated schools through reviews because of the legislation under which they are created. Private schools are not included.

What can result from a network review?

The issues that led to a review can't be ignored so usually keeping the status quo isn't an option. A review could mean fewer schools (through closures and/or mergers), more schools, new schools or different types of schools.

How are reviews run?

The form of a review will be adapted to the particular area being covered. All are likely to work through these stages:

· Ministry identifies need for a network review and makes a recommendation to the Minister, who announces the review;

· Ministry contacts schools to be involved, and a community reference group is formed;

§ The reference group is set up to provide a platform for discussion, oversee the process of a review and to present the community perspective on education provision.

§ Membership of the reference group is shaped by community needs.

§ The composition of the reference group will include school trustees and principals, NZSTA (New Zealand School Trustees Association), NZEI (New Zealand Educational Institute), PPTA (Post Primary Teachers Association) and iwi and may include local Pasifika groups, early childhood groups, local government representatives and community organisations. Every school involved in the process must be represented.

· Reference group's facilitator is identified;

· Facilitator presents data and information and suggests some potential future schooling models for the community to discuss;

· Facilitator consults with individual Boards of Trustees. facilitator and/or Boards then consult with communities;

· Facilitator produces stage 1 report summarising all discussions and setting out possible options;

· Boards consult with their communities on report. Facilitator consults with Boards. facilitator summarises all the discussions in a report to the reference group;

· Ministry produces submission 1 for the Minister, taking the reference group's report into account;

· Minister makes a proposal and communicates this to Boards, and announces it publicly;

· Boards consult their communities and facilitator consults with Boards;

· Ministry analyses the reference group's report and produces submission 2 for the Minister presenting the results of consultation and any changed recommendations;

· Minister considers all feedback and communicates his decision to Boards;

· Boards of schools that may close then have a further 28 days to comment.

How are school re-organisations funded? The Education Development Initiative (EDI) policy has been developed to manage school closure and merger funding. Additional money is made available to schools that remain after the review.

The amount of funding is generated from a formula based on school rolls. The same formula applies schools in all network reviews so all schools are treated equally.

The different parts of this funding are:

· a cash grant for individual schools;

· property entitlements; and

· in most cases resources for future shared school education projects.

The board of trustees, with Ministry input, then plans for the best use of the money to enhance teaching and learning in their school.

Who gets a say? The process of a network review involves a significant amount of community consultation. When proposals are put to the Minister, there are legal requirements for consultation, depending on the changes proposed.

This means at least two periods of consultation with the community.

Once the Minister announces the review there is about a month of consultation before he announces his proposal. There is another month of consultation before the Minister makes a decision. If the decision includes a school closure then those Boards have a further 28 days to comment.

Boards of trustees may also do their own consultation with parents and communities.

Why are school reviews needed? The Minister wants the Ministry to ensure all children have access to a quality education well into the future, whatever their background and wherever they live.

The size and make-up of communities change that means schools must also change to meet their students' needs.

The Ministry has access to a great deal of data and information relating to school and early childhood provision, performance and participation. The Ministry also provides demographic data and projections.

Across many parts of New Zealand there is a primary school roll decline which impacts on the way education is provided. This will flow through into the secondary sector. A review allows the community to assess this information, to reflect on its implications and to assist in deciding how to address the local issues.

Why do them now?

If change is necessary the best time to address the issues and to plan for the future is now. It is better to begin planning early rather than delaying until issues have become so difficult to deal with that options are limited.

This doesn't mean that all change has to be immediate.

A decision could be that some things remain as they are for now but that future changes are needed and must be planned for. If there is uncertainty about whether change is necessary or desirable, a review can help to clarify that question.

What benefits can result from a review?

· Ensuring local students have access to quality education into the future;

· Planning that takes account of demographic change and its impact on schooling requirements;

· Educational resources being used wisely and well;

· Release of under-utilised school resources back into the school communities;

· More money available to invest in better teaching and learning resources;

· Schools having workable rolls for many years;

· More co-operation between schools;

· Consideration of new models for the delivery of education;

· More viable and supportive professional communities for teachers to enhance their development and benefit their students; and

· Increased community involvement in educational debate and decision-making.

How long do reviews take?

The review timeframe is flexible to allow for all parties to have a say. Approximately it should take nine months from the first announcement to the final decision.

How can I find out more?

Information, processes and timeframes specific to a network review are provided at community meetings and discussed in detail with schools and Boards. Local Ministry of Education offices also have information on reviews in their area. Information is also available on the Ministry's Website www.minedu.govt.nz/ The Minister's press releases on announcements surrounding network reviews are stored at: http://www.beehive.govt.nz/Minister.cfm?MinisterID=3


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Veronika Meduna: The Kaikoura Rebuild

A Scoop Foundation Investigation

Friday will be a big day for people north of Kaikōura – and for hundreds of construction workers who are racing to reopen State Highway 1 in time for the holiday season.

By the afternoon, the South Island’s main transport corridor will be open to traffic again, more than a year after a magnitude 7.8 earthquake mangled bridges and tunnels, twisted rail tracks and buried sections of the road under massive landslides. More>>

 

BPS HYEFU WYSIWYG: Labour's Budget Plans, Families Package

“Today we are announcing the full details of the Government’s Families Package. This is paid for by rejecting National’s tax cuts and instead targeting spending at those who need it most. It will lift 88,000 children out of poverty by 2021." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Defence Spending, Alabama, And Dolly Parton

The spending lavished on Defence projects to meet the risks that could maybe, possibly, theoretically face New Zealand in future is breath-taking, given how successive governments have been reluctant to spend even a fraction of those amounts on the nation’s actual social needs. More>>

ALSO:

Members' Bills: End Of Life Choice Bill Passes First Reading

The End of Life Choice Bill in the name of David Seymour has been sent to a select committee for consideration by 76 votes to 44. It is the third time Parliament has voted on the issue in recent decades and the first time such a Bill has made it over the first hurdle. More>>

ALSO:

State Sector: MPI Survives Defrag Of Portfolios

The Ministry for Primary Industries will not be split under the new government, but will instead serve as an overarching body for four portfolio-based entities focused on fisheries, forestry, biosecurity and food safety. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Vulnerable Kids, RNZ Funding, And Poppy

The decision to remove the word ‘vulnerable’ from the Ministry for Vulnerable Children could well mark a whole shift in approach to the care of children in need... More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages