Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

PPCS Vs Richmond Law Changed Urged


PPCS Vs Richmond Law Changed Urged

ACT New Zealand Justice Spokesman Stephen Franks today urged the Commerce Minister Margaret Wilson to amend Securities Law, to reverse the message sent by the Court of Appeal's decision in the PPCS and Richmond litigation.

"Labour yesterday announced it would amend the law to avoid, in future, the outcome of the GPG vs Perry Corporation litigation. The PPCS vs Richmond case is just as unfortunate. The outcome encourages people contemplating a cold-blooded breach of the law to assume they might get away with the benefits even if they face a hefty penalty," Mr Franks said.

"In other words, it will encourage some to look at the penalty as just a tax on the profits of breaching the law. My letter to the Minister reads as follows:

Dear Minister

Enforcement of Securities Law: PPCS and Richmond

I note that Mr Geoff Connor of the Ministry of Economic Development is reported in yesterday's New Zealand Herald as confirming that the Securities Markets Act will be amended as a result of GPG failing in its lawsuit against Perry Corporation. I endorse this focus on the enforceability of the existing provisions.

I urge you to include in that foreshadowed amendment, a provision to ensure that the result in the litigation brought by the Bell Group of Richmond shareholders against PPCS, is similarly neutralised. The judgments in the High Court and Court of Appeal revealed calculated wrongdoing. At the High Court level, the orders made attempted to ensure that the wrongdoers could not benefit from their wrongdoing.

At the Court of Appeal, the Judge's orders were partially reversed. The net effect was to leave the wrongdoers with a penalty that was paltry in context, secure in the achievement of their original commercial objective. There is a widespread market view that the Court of Appeal decision negated the moral effect of the earlier outcome in the High Court, though the Court of Appeal did not reverse the findings of wrongdoing.

It was open to the Court of Appeal to conclude as it did, but it could equally have upheld the effect of the decision appealed against. I believe Parliament should signal support for the approach taken by Willy Young J, and focus the Courts on the removal of incentives to indulge in sharp practice.

I suggest an amendment to Section 32 of the Securities Markets Act 1988, by the insertion of an additional sub-section, perhaps numbered (2A) to read along the following lines:

"An order under sub section 1 of this section should take into account the full extent of advantages obtained by any wrongdoer with the assistance of any failure to comply with this Act, and the order should, so far as is reasonably practicable, result in the wrongdoer being deprived of all of the advantages so obtained, or subject to a financial disadvantage of equivalent value."

Yours sincerely

Stephen Franks MP

ACT New Zealand

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

 
 

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>

ALSO:

Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election