Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Muriel Newman: The Winds Of Change

Muriel Newman – The Column
The Winds of Change

The winds of change are now sweeping towards New Zealand’s Family Court. In a report to Parliament earlier this month, not only has the Law Commission recommended that the Family Court be more open but, both the former and present Chief Family Court Judges have indicated that the judiciary is relaxed about more openness and that it is now time for Parliament to address this issue.

The Family Court – which deals with matters effecting families – was set up in 1980, as a result of recommendations of a Royal Commission on Courts. While it has predominantly been a closed court since then, over recent years – fuelled by the belief that the court was no longer achieving the best outcome for children – pressure has been mounting to open the court up to public scrutiny.

In particular, families torn apart by this secret court’s judgements believe they have been denied their fundamental right in a free society to speak out about their perceived injustice. Similarly, the media have been prevented from reporting such cases under threat of prosecution. Last week’s conviction of National MP Nick Smith – along with Radio New Zealand and TV3 – for speaking out about just such a case has significantly raised public concern about the Family Court, adding impetus to the mood for change.

In light of these developments, it is timely that my Private Member’s Bill to open up the Family Court – the Family Court (Openness of Proceedings) Amendment Bill – is presently before Parliament. I am hopeful that all political parties will recognise the need to take this issue seriously and support the Bill to a Select Committee.

Moves to make the Family Court more open are not unknown to new Principle Family Court Judge Peter Boshier. Three years ago he took the unusual step of inviting the media to report on events in his court because of concerns over the Department of Child, Youth and Family’s on-going failure of to uphold the orders of the court. In fact, he was so outraged by the incompetence of the Northland branch of the Department that he threatened to charge CYF managers with contempt.

Earlier this year another Family Court Judge, Tim Druce, continued the judicial name and shame campaign against the Government’s child welfare agency by ordering a judgement regarding the failure of the same branch of CYF to be made public.

Overseas experience has shown that a reduction in child abuse occurs if a Family Court is more open. With the prospect of the regular reporting of inefficiencies and failure – instead of isolated cases – the state child welfare agency has a strong incentive to improve its performance. Other children who are the major beneficiaries of a more open court are those caught up in family breakdown battles. Many of those children walk into a courtroom with two parents, but leave with one. The court effectively tears families apart under the guise of being ‘family friendly’, causing heartbreak, suicide, anger, and pain, and creating an enormous sense of injustice and loss.

But it goes deeper. There is now overwhelming evidence that the awarding of sole custody of children to mothers – historically the predominant outcome of Family Court custody cases – can lead to the widespread alienation of fathers. The problem is that limiting a father’s access to his children has now been shown to cause them significant disadvantage, with boys more likely to drop out of school and get into trouble with the police, and girls more likely to become sexually promiscuous. In light of this, having laws in place that weaken the relationship between a father and his children no longer appears sensible. Unfortunately, many New Zealanders are largely unaware of the problems caused by ‘fatherlessness’, because they arise as a result of judgements made in the secret Family Court. Ensuring such issues are more widely understood is one of the strongest reasons for lifting the veil of secrecy that shrouds the Family Court.

There is little downside to a more open Family Court – so long as judges retain the right to protect the identity of the individuals and close the court on a case-by-case basis. Leaving judges with such veto powers means that access can also be restricted in cases deemed to be too sensitive. If New Zealand follows the experiences of other countries, open justice will provide significant benefits: children better supported by parents and grandparents, less parental alienation, a drop in litigation as more couples choose mediation, a reduction in the cost of legal aid, a decline in the number of false allegations made by parents against one another, less child abuse, and, through the efforts of the fourth estate, a far greater public appreciation of the profound effects of family law legislation on children, families and society.

Do you think it is time for the Family Court to be more open?


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On Thompson+ Clark, And Russia’s FIFA World Cup

Daily, the coalition government keeps running into examples of the toxic legacy left behind by National – and just as regularly, even the simple fixes are proving stubbornly difficult to enact. Take the case of the security firm Thompson + Clark, which has been employed – time and again - by state agencies over the past decade, to spy on (and provide security against) ordinary New Zealanders engaged in lawful forms of protest. More>>

 

HiveMind: Fair Enough? How Should New Zealanders Be Taxed?

Have Your Say! Scoop and PEP invite you to share your issues, ideas and perspectives on the NZ tax system with other New Zealanders using Scoop’s HiveMind tool. This Tax HiveMind is intended to complement and feed into the review being run by the Government-appointed Tax Working Group (TWG), which is looking at the fairness, balance and structure of the tax system with a 10-year time horizon. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The GCSB’s Security Hang-Up With Russia

So our GCSB has chimed in, alongside its British, Australian and US allies, with warnings about a “fresh wave” of Russian cyber attacks, although the warning has been curiously framed. More>>

ALSO:

PM's Europe Trip: CHOGM & Bilateral Meetings

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is in urope for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in London and meetings with counterparts in Paris and Berlin. More>>

ALSO:

Hit And Run: AG Gives Approval For Inquiry

Attorney-General David Parker has today announced a Government Inquiry will be held into Operation Burnham and related events. The operation undertaken in Tirgiran Valley, Afghanistan, ... More>>

ALSO:

Addressing Climate Change: No New Offshore Exploration Permits

The Coalition Government is taking an important step to address climate change and create a clean, green and sustainable future for New Zealand, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. More>>

ALSO:

Road Safety Summit: Actions To Improve Identified

The Local Government Road Safety Summit held last week identified actions that will lead to lasting changes to road safety in New Zealand, says Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages