Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Family Court Changes Could Be No Change At All


Family Court Changes Could Be No Change At All

ACT New Zealand Deputy Leader and Social Welfare Spokesman Dr Muriel Newman today issued official information confirming that the Labour Government's changes to bring more openness into the Family Court could well be toothless.

"While clause 129 (1)(fa) of the Care of Children Bill certainly allows accredited media and a wider range of people to attend Family Court hearings, clause 129 (3) contains sweeping provisions to allow parties involved in a case to object," Dr Newman said.

"I have sought clarification from the Government as to its intention: if it becomes common practice to object to the presence of media in hearings, then claims of bringing more openness into the Family Court are false. Today, I asked the Minister's office"

`Can any party to proceedings object to the presence of an accredited news media reporter and if so can a Judge exclude them from proceedings?'

"And the official answer:

`A party is free to raise concerns with the presiding judge about the presence of witnesses, a person speaking about a child's cultural background, support persons and an accredited news media reporter at a hearing. The judge is entitled to request any of the above persons to leave a courtroom, and the person must comply with such a request (cl 129 (3) - this provision is an extension of s27(2) of the Guardianship Act 1968).'

The Bill does not attempt to prescribe in what situations a Judge would make such a request. This is not unusual in legislation. There are a number of situations in which it might be appropriate to exclude observers, as opposed to parties, from a hearing.

Examples justifying exclusion might include intensely personal evidence of sexual abuse; the presence of one party's supporters is intimidating the other party; a child is giving evidence in Court; or where the persons are disrupting the hearing.

"In making a decision under clause 129 (3), a Judge will balance a number of competing interests, including the need for transparency and public interest in proceedings against the privacy interests of the parties involved and the best interests of the child.

"This answer demonstrates that, despite of Labour's rhetoric, openness appears to be an optional extra. That is why changing the presumption of the court from closed to open was so important, and why it was so disappointing to see the government opposing that move in order to protect the secrecy in the court", Dr Newman said.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Our Posturing At The UN

In New York, Key basically took an old May 2 Washington Post article written by Barack Obama, recycled it back to the Americans, and still scored headlines here at home… We’ve had a double serving of this kind of comfort food. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty Settlements: Bills Delayed As NZ First Pulls Support

Ngāruahine, Te Atiawa and Taranaki are reeling today as they learnt that the third and final readings of each Iwi’s Historical Treaty Settlement Bills scheduled for this Friday, have been put in jeopardy by the actions of NZ First. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Damage De-Regulation Is Doing To Fisheries And Education, Plus Kate Tempest

Our faith in the benign workings of the market – and of the light-handed regulation that goes with it – has had a body count. Back in 1992, the free market friendly Health Safety and Employment Act gutted the labour inspectorate and turned forestry, mining and other workplace sites into death traps, long before the Pike River disaster. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news