No more animal secrets - or no more public funding!

Green MP Sue Kedgley today called for taxpayer funding for animal experimentation to be cut off from public institutions that refuse to publicly account for their experiments on live animals, on the eve of the expected release of animal use statistics by the National Animal Ethics Advisory Committee.

Ms Kedgley said that the four institutions - AgResearch, Lincoln University, Forest Research Institute (FRI) and Crown Research Institute Palmerston North (CRI) - are hiding behind the veil of 'commercial sensitivity' and refusing to release all of their animal use data.

"It is frankly outrageous that these institutions are using public money to experiment on animals and then refusing to account to the public about what they are doing with our money," said Ms Kedgley, the Green spokesperson for Animal Welfare.

"If they're not prepared to be publicly accountable, they shouldn't receive public funding for experiments.

Ms Kedgley said all four institutes had stonewalled attempts to uncover the information about the extent and nature of their experiments on live animals.

Five months after lodging an Official Information request to the Minister of Agriculture, AgResearch (the institution that undertakes the most experiments on animals) was still refusing to release information such as the levels of suffering or how many animals had died during its experiments.

"After appealing to the Ombudsman to prise information from AgResearch, Lincoln University, FRI and CRI and 20 other institutions, I have still not received any data. The refusal of these institutions to release their animal use data to the public shows just how little public accountability there is," said Ms Kedgley.

"These institutions are hiding behind 'commercial sensitivity' as an excuse not to release the data. This is a red herring. There's nothing commercially sensitive about how much suffering is involved in animal experiments and we've never asked for individuals involved to be named.

"Unless these publicly-funded institutions start behaving responsibly and publicly disclose the animal experiments data, their public funding should be withdrawn immediately.

"The public has a right to know what is happening in our publicly-funded research institutions and why AgResearch experimented on 56,000 animals last year," she said.

Ms Kedgley said vivisection and the use of animals for scientific experiments is a highly controversial activity of great concern to many New Zealanders. "Sadly, tomorrow's release of animal use statistics would not shed any light on the reasons why hundreds of thousands of live animals are experimented on each year."

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On the Sony cyber attack

Given the layers of meta-irony involved, the saga of the Sony cyber attack seemed at the outset more like a snarky European art film than a popcorn entry at the multiplex.

Yet now with (a) President Barack Obama weighing in on the side of artistic freedom and calling for the US to make a ‘proportionate response’quickly followed by (b) North Korea’s entire Internet service going down, and with both these events being followed by (c) Sony deciding to backtrack and release The Interview film that had made it a target for the dastardly North Koreans in the first place, then ay caramba…the whole world will now be watching how this affair pans out. More>>