Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Income Splitting Is The Answer

Media Statement
For immediate release
Wednesday, 25 August 2004

Income splitting is the answer

United Future revenue spokesperson Gordon Copeland has again spelt out why income splitting for couples raising children should have a place in New Zealand’s income tax future.

“After the Budget,” Mr Copeland said, “John Key, now National’s finance spokesperson, pointed out that the net take-home pay of a one-income two-parent family with two young children living in Auckland or Wellington would be a mere $2,376 per annum more for a family on $60,000 than a family on just $38,000.

“This is because the family on $38,000 would receive a net $4,860 under the government’s new Working for Families package whereas the family on $60,000 would pay a net tax of $14,764.

“However, having identified the problem, John Key has yet to propose a solution. For its part government ministers Dr Michael Cullen and Steve Maharey simply respond by saying that “high marginal tax rates for people in the middle income bracket are always a feature of income assistance schemes of this type”. Hardly a satisfactory answer.

“United Future therefore seems to be the only party able to offer for couples with dependent children an answer. That answer is income splitting.

“The income of the family on $60,000 would then be split 50/50 for tax purposes with a resultant tax saving against their present position, of $2,970 per annum. They would then enjoy a net income differential of $5,346 – almost twice the figure calculated by John Key – over the $38,000 per annum couple.

“Income splitting dovetails well with the Working for Families package announced in the government’s 2004 Budget. The package commences at low income levels and phases out towards the top end of the middle income bracket.

“Income splitting on the other hand starts to pay dividends to couples raising kids from the middle income level up to a family income level of $120,000 per annum.

“It’s an idea whose time has come. It is now a key feature of the income tax system in several American States and is being promoted by the newly formed “Family First” political party in Australia. It is a fair and concrete way of recognising that couples raising children face additional costs by comparison with singles or couples without dependent children.

“More importantly, it is a tangible recognition that raising kids is the most important job in the world since it is an investment in the future of our nation.

“It will remain a key United Future point of difference going into the 2005 elections.”



1. Table showing the effect of income splitting for one-income, two- parent family with two young children living in south or West Auckland or Wellington City:


Gross Income

$ 38,000

$ 60,000


Income Tax

- $7,410


- $11,700

ACC levy

- $ 456

- $720

- $720

Family assistance

+ $7,198

+ $598

+ $598

Accommodation supplement

+ $5,528

+ $28

+ $ 28

Net Income

$ 42,860

$ 45,236



+ $2,376

+ $5,346

2. Treasury have costed United Future’s income splitting policy at $500 million per annum before taking into account what is known as “second round effects” through increased GST revenue etc. The secondary effects would reduce the costs to around $425 million, an amount which United Future believes is readily affordable via reduced government expenditure, e.g. a switch to a mixture of public and private provision in health, education and prisons.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>


Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>


Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>


Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>


With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>


Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>


Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news