Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


The Letter: IT’S BOOMING

The Letter: IT’S BOOMING

The economy is growing. Record volumes of freight are being moved, a first indicator of growth. The much predicted slow down shows no sign of coming. Judging from our suburb we predict the Warehouse sold record amounts of fireworks. When people are prepared to literally burn their money it’s a good sign they are confident of earning more. The international indicators are good. The US share market welcomed Bush’s victory. Oil prices fell significantly last week. Spring has finally come and with it remarkable grass growth. The Letter predicts that economy is significantly out performing official estimates.


Before we carry on, a couple of questions. What do you think is the average household income? What do you think households pay in tax as a %? Write down your answers below.


Record growth means record tax revenues. Cullen has become fixated by having a large surplus. His meetings with Standard & Poors made him realise how much weight the rating agencies place on the surplus. He personally seeks financial credibility. So Cullen feels he must be more conservative. This would be bearable except Cullen also believes he can spend your money better than you can.


Using parliamentary questions Rodney Hide found out how much of the average household’s income goes to the government in tax. Treasury replied that the mean household income is $55,600 per year. This is up nearly $5,000 under Labour. How much do we pay in tax? On these figures on average 46.3%. Before you say that can’t be so, remember GST, and we include rates, because just try not paying them. If you smoke you are really working until after lunch each day for Helen Clark.


When Rodney Hide revealed that under Labour, average household income after tax had fallen by $1,040. Cullen said that can’t be right. (So don’t feel bad if your guesses were wrong – even the Finance Minister did not know). When Rodney informed him that these are Treasury figures, Cullen replied that Treasury was wrong. It’s really unusual for a Minister to publicly question his department and even more unusual for the Finance Minister to suggest that Treasury can’t do figures. Cullen said he would get them to redo the figures and they would show household incomes under Labour had increased.


Civil Servants do as they are told. When Cullen told Treasury their figures were wrong and he wanted new figures showing how much better off we all are the Treasury duly complied. Cullen released them in his war of words with Rodney. Average household income has gone from $60,510 in 2000, i.e. when Labour came to office, to $68,280, a 12.7% increase. The average household income is above the mean because some households have a number of incomes. The average household tax has gone from $19,760 to $24,960, which Cullen concedes is a 26.3% increase! But, Cullen triumphantly points out households’ after tax income has increased under Labour from $40,800 to $43,320. That is an increase of $2,520, meaning households are, according to our Minister of Finance, 6.2% better off.


The danger of asking departments to produce figures to prove an answer is that the officials in their eagerness to comply will often provide information that actually proves the opposite. "You have forgotten about inflation," replied Rodney. From December 1999 to December 2003 inflation increased by 10.4%. Using the information Cullen got the Treasury to supply, Rodney recalculated households’ inflation adjusted after tax income.


In 2000 the average household’s net income was $45,058. Today in 2000 dollars, i.e. inflation adjusted it is $43,320. We are $1,738.45 worse off. That’s minus 3.9%.


Rodney has fronted up and admitted he was wrong claiming that the average household is $1,040 worse off after tax under Labour and agreed with Treasury the real figure is $1,738.45. That’s the sort of party ACT is, big enough to admit a mistake. On Friday Cullen responded to these devastating figures by issuing a bizarre press statement, which said, "Mr Hide has made a basic mistake. The Treasury household tax estimate includes GST, which is a tax on expenditure not income. Therefore to do as Mr Hide has done and subtract an expenditure tax from an income base to arrive at net income is a nonsense". Translated, Cullen is claiming that we should not count GST when working out the average household’s income because we only pay GST when we spend the income. The problem with this approach is you can’t buy goods and services without paying GST. Perhaps one could say that the average household’s buying power after tax is down $1,738.45 under Labour. Amazingly there has been no coverage from the Press Gallery. Perhaps because the average journalist can’t do maths. See


So how do we explain the boom in consumer spending? We read about US consumer’s level of debt. In relative terms NZ’s debt is higher. The Reserve Bank has halted its interest rate rises because of its concern as to what these rises will do to the average households financial viability.


Last week we asked, "Do you support Stephen Franks’ bill restoring the common law rights to self-defence?" 99% of readers said yes. This week’s question, "Should government adjust the tax thresholds for inflation?" - we will send the answer to Dr Cullen.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>


Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>


United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>


Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election