Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Labour blind to flaws in families welfare package

John Key MP
National Party Finance Spokesman

31 March 2005

Labour blind to flaws in ‘families’ welfare package

National Party Finance spokesman John Key says Steve Maharey has proven in Parliament today that Labour is “blind to the fundamental flaws” in its Working For Families package.

He is commenting on the inability of the Social Development Minister to explain why so many high-earning singles and childless couples are to be given the accommodation supplement in the so-called ‘families’ package.

“The Minister didn’t even know how bad Labour’s model is,” says Mr Key, referring to written Parliamentary questions answered by the Finance Minister last year.

“Those answers, which Mr Maharey should have known about, show that by April 2007 half of the people receiving the accommodation supplement will be single with no children. (PQ - 08943 2004 attached)

“So much for the ‘Working For Families’ slogan.

“The answers also show that 150 single people with no children who earn more than $40,000 a year will get the accommodation supplement, and they reveal that two single people and three couples earning as much as $80,000 a year will get the accommodation supplement.

“Hard-working middle and low income families will be asking why people with no children and earning up to $80,000 a year are eligible for this welfare top-up.”

Mr Key has also taken issue with claims that the working for families package will help move people from welfare to work.

“The facts don’t bear that out at all.

“Treasury says fewer than 2% of sole parents will move off benefits and into work, and there will be no net change for couple families as a result of the package. Even the Labour Department advised Cabinet that the package would reduce incentives to work for middle-income families,” says Mr Key.

Ends

Attached: PQ - 08943 (2004) - 2 pages.

Parliamentary Question 08943 (2004)

Sent: Tuesday, 24 August 2004 04:14 p.m.
To: John Key
Subject: 08943 (2004) Published - Finance - Corrected Reply

Question: What is the estimated number of persons who received the
accommodation supplement in 2000, the number who receive it currently, and the number who are expected to receive it in April 2007; broken down by family type, number of children, and gross income bands of $5,000?

Portfolio: Finance
Minister: Hon Dr Michael Cullen
Date Lodged:24/06/2004
Answer Text: (Below)


Departments do not hold suitable data to provide this information for 2000.

My officials failed to provide me with complete information for my consideration at the time of replying to written parliamentary questions 8943 to 8948.

I now submit the following additional information to be attached to the replies previously submitted for Parliamentary Questions 8943 - 8948.

1. The model used to produce these estimates uses a specially prepared dataset. The dataset for 2004 has not yet been prepared, therefore the most recent dataset – that for 2002/03 – has been used instead. This is the same dataset that is used for the estimates for 2007.

2. The entries in the <$5,000 column arise because MSD only records income for the period for which persons are paid a benefit of some sort, be it a primary benefit or a supplementary benefit. Thus those with recorded incomes of less than $5,000 are those who have been receiving a benefit for less than twelve months. Many persons who fall into the $5,000-$10,000 column also have been receiving benefits for less than twelve months.

3. The above analyses for 2007 includes only those eligible for AS under current rules. An estimated additional 21,600 persons will receive AS by 2007 as a result of W4F changes. It is not possible to split these persons into the required breakdowns. The indicative assessment of this breakdown by family type is:

With Children Single No Children Couples No Children Total
2006/07 14900 4900 1800 21600

As at June 03 Persons who receive Accommodation Supplement

< $5k $5k-$10k $10k-$15k $15k-$20k $20k-$25k $25k-$30k $30k-$35k $35k-$40k $40k-$45k $45k-$50k $50k-$55k $55k-$60k $60k-$80k Total
Single 3,013 69,631 48,651 6,366 1,909 439 223 76 54 37 12 2 130,412
Single & 1 child 1,361 191 27,986 9,961 7,073 524 257 107 28 24 8 47,520
Single & 2 children 1,038 46 122 20,502 7,793 637 214 134 54 23 11 30,574
Single & 3 children 413 12 54 8,479 2,771 203 80 31 13 7 5 12,068
Single & 4+ children 138 8 26 3,919 989 74 30 13 3 5,200
Couple 1,002 93 2,534 5,800 3,659 772 470 101 63 28 10 1 2 14,535
Couple & 1 child 1,365 90 100 2,427 1,644 520 295 178 94 63 17 6,794
Couple & 2 children 1,324 73 105 2,357 1,726 592 421 204 102 55 27 6,987
Couple & 3 children 615 27 61 1,306 952 317 193 115 58 31 6 3,682
Couple & 4+ children 385 21 26 1,117 694 231 149 62 40 20 8 2,754
Total 10,656 70,192 79,664 62,233 29,211 4,310 2,333 1,021 509 288 104 3 2 260,526

As at April 07 Persons who receive Accommodation Supplement

< $5k $5k-$10k $10k-$15k $15k-$20k $20k-$25k $25k-$30k $30k-$35k $35k-$40k $40k-$45k $45k-$50k $50k-$55k $55k-$60k $60k-$80k Total
Single 2,746 24,759 78,849 23,174 2,246 581 254 146 60 49 31 8 2 132,906
Single & 1 child 1,361 25 84 34,266 10,995 1,290 358 170 65 24 20 6 48,663
Single & 2 children 1,040 27 64 20,821 7,892 937 299 157 94 50 14 11 31,407
Single & 3 children 404 6 36 8,591 2,840 309 95 56 23 10 6 5 12,383
Single & 4+ children 132 5 14 3,982 998 117 37 22 9 3 5,320
Couple 1,010 52 2,338 5,795 3,640 819 720 172 81 55 20 7 3 14,710
Couple & 1 child 1,394 79 84 2,428 1,547 510 428 199 150 81 54 7 6,959
Couple & 2 children 1,351 65 86 2,339 1,646 551 500 318 148 87 43 22 7,157
Couple & 3 children 630 25 44 1,314 901 291 272 141 93 45 22 5 3,782
Couple & 4+ children 393 16 22 1,119 671 206 195 97 59 23 20 5 2,825
Total 10,462 25,058 81,621 103,829 33,375 5,610 3,159 1,477 782 426 230 78 5 266,111


Totals may differ from the sum of their components due to rounding.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>

ALSO:

More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news