Did Clark leak or confirm false information on Doone? Rodney Hide

Wednesday, 27 April 2005

Helen Clark must come clean on whether she knifed former Police Commissioner Peter Doone in the back by leaking information to the media, ACT leader Rodney Hide said today.

Mr Hide’s call follows the news that Peter Doone has discontinued defamation proceedings against the Sunday Star-Times because “new evidence had identified a prominent third party who was the apparent source of the alleged defamatory statements.” That third party is believed to be the Prime Minister.

“We all know that Prime Minister Helen Clark wanted rid of Doone. What we didn’t know is that she may have knifed him in the back by leaking or confirming false information,” Mr Hide said.

“It’s truly shocking that a Prime Minister might leak or confirm leaked information to the media to undermine her own Police Commissioner. It’s doubly shocking that the information may have been false.

“Helen Clark needs to front up and answer two simple questions: Did she leak or confirm confidential information on Peter Doone to the media? If so, was that information she leaked confirmed to be true?

“New Zealanders need to know that they can trust the Prime Minister. Helen Clark’s answers to these two questions will go to the heart of whether the public can trust her.

“New Zealanders need to know whether Helen Clark knifed her top cop in the back. How could anyone ever trust her if she did,” Mr Hide said.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell:
On What John Banks And Nick Smith Have In Common

The defence that John Banks has been offering to the charges of electoral fraud – that he didn’t read the document he signed, and therefore lacked the necessary criminal intent – is a fairly standard example of political business as usual.

At a time when political power is being centralised downtown in the Executive, responsibility is being re-located to the suburbs. The Beehive seeks to operate as a blame free, shame free environment. At all times, plausible deniability is to be maintained.

Being able to put distance between the Minister and the actions/outcomes/political fallout of policy is not simply the last desperate resort of scoundrels, but the first resort of the foot soldiers in ministerial service... More>>