Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


$400 mill. shortfall in Nats' law and order budget

Hon Phil Goff
Minister of Justice

31 August 2005 Media Statement

$400 million shortfall in Nats' law and order budget

National's alternative budget totally fails to provide the sums necessary to meet the cost of their promises on law and order, Justice Minister Phil Goff revealed today.

"Don Brash, following his policy launch in July 2004, said the total cost would be $600 million over existing spending," Mr Goff said. "Our own estimate is that it would cost $700 million per year.

"However John Key has only set aside $100 million, rising to $300 million by year three, to meet the cost of abolishing parole. And that is just the operational cost. Nothing has been set aside to meet the estimated $1.4 billion capital cost for the seven additional prisons that would be required.

"In saying that the private sector would pay for the prisons, John Key is disingenuously pretending that private owners would not want any return on their capital. That is patently nonsense.

"What is more, Key has set no money at all aside to pay for all the other promises such as more police, more DNA testing, denial of bail for repeat offenders, etc.

"The discrepancy in just this one area of policy is significant. Multiplied across many policy areas, National's failure to properly, or even consistently, cost their policies leaves a massive credibility gap.

"John Key's budget deletes the costs but not the promises. The message is clear. Either the promises are unfunded and can't be believed; or the budget will blow out, requiring major borrowing, boosting inflation and mortgage interest rates; or the full hidden Business Roundtable agenda will be implemented with the decimation of health, education and superannuation spending.

"All this is further evidence that National is neither fit nor ready to govern," Mr Goff said.

Attached: Transcripts of Brash and Key on law and order costings.


National's Law and Order costings, in their own words

Scoop interviews John Key on National's alternative budget, 24 August 2005

Scoop: In terms of the detail of the budget. Is this money for law and order?

Key: Yes. It's the cost of increasing parole … no, of effectively cancelling parole for the worst offenders. So –

Scoop: And it's no – I just find that rather difficult to believe. That you can cancel parole for a hundred million dollars.

Key: Well it costs three hundred of course by year three, but 'cause don't forget it takes some time, because –

Scoop: But then don't you have to build a whole lot of prisons.

Key: Not really, actually. Um – we're looking at all sorts of issues like double-bunking and it takes some time to flow through, ah, so, no, it's … and don't forget –

Scoop: When the policy was announced there was, I think there was a $2 billion capital expenditure. Assumption.

Key: Yeah – well, no, $300 million was the funding number. That ties up exactly with the funding number we had, $300 million. I'm not sure we'd actually build any more prisons, I mean for instance Labour had built four prisons, I saw Michael Cullen say the other day they'd built four prisons, he's arguing, for a billion dollars in the last three years or so. We certainly wouldn't need more – well, you know, four more prisons. Ah – and secondly, we're quite keen to use the private sector in prisons, I mean Labour closed the Auckland remand prison, we actually thought that worked tremendously well and so did the public, um Labour just for ideological reasons closed it, so, no, we – well this is our operating budget and it's –

Scoop: But, I mean, private prisons aren't free.

Key: No, no, but I mean, what you were asking about are capital expenditure and we don't necessarily need capex if we use the private sector we don't need our own capital, so –

Scoop: But the operating expenditure I would have thought was also –

Key: No – we – it's fully costed. Tied up with what we said when we did at the time.

Extract from Don Brash's speech on 4 July 2004

To operate the prison service now costs around $600 million annually. If the prison population increased by 50% as a result of the abolition of parole (which is possible if offending rates do not reduce), the increase in annual operating cost could rise by around $300 million after about five years. Additional prisons will also involve significant one-off capital costs, possibly of up to $1 billion, though to keep taxpayer costs as low as possible we would contract the running of these to the private sector.

Morning Report, 5 July 2004

Presenter: How many more prisons will you need?

Brash: Well of course it depends how big the prisons are. I don’t think you can talk about how many prisons you’ll need. What you talk about is how many more prisoners you have and as I say we judge that to be an increase of about a half.

Nine to Noon, 5 July 2004

Presenter: So that’s 3000 more people in jail?

Brash: Yes, that’s true.

Presenter: And where would you put them?

Brash: Well, clearly we would need more prisons, no doubt about that.

Brash: I estimate that it would cost approximately $300 million operating costs annually by the time this policy is in place. Currently prisons cost about $600 million. We’re assuming that a 50 percent increase in prison population would add about a further $300 million a year. That is less than one percent of government spending a year, less than one percent.

Presenter: But that’s also just the tip of the iceberg isn’t it, because implicit in this policy is more spending on police, is more spending on the DNA collection and housing.

Brash: Let’s supposing you double the figure from $300 million to $600 million and that I think would be more than sufficient, you’re still talking about less than two percent of government spending.

Holmes, 5 July 2004

Wood: The Prime Minister says you've way under-estimated the cost of this. She puts ah 10 prisons she reckons, 200 million each, ah that's $2 billion plus $3 billion in operating costs. That's a lot of money.

Brash: Well let's put it this way. She says $3 billion in operating costs over a 10 year period about $300 million a year, that's exactly the figure I quoted in my speech. So it's quite consistent with my numbers

Wood: But it is not just more prisons you're talking about building, you're talking about attacking it one end, you're talking about more police, you're talking about obviously better labs because, you know, they're struggling now to cope with the work they have so you're talking about a range of costs aren't you.

Brash: Absolutely. Let's take DNA testing as an example. It's been estimated that that would cost about $20 million a year. Add that to $300 million, add a bit more for, for additional ah post release monitoring, a bit more for police, let's say $500 million in total. You're still talking about barely more than 1% of Government spending.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods ( is the dollar up or down? ) last night’s outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country..>>>More


Labour on its agreement |Peters: Post-Election Announcement Speech | Greenpeace “cautiously hopeful” about new Government | ACT - Madman on the loose | E tū ecstatic | Chamber welcomes the outcome | Greens on their joining Govt | EDS welcomes new govt | Immigrant groups worry | Feds ready to engage new coalition government | Labour Ministers of the Crown announced


Climate: Increasing Greenhouse Emissions Hit NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate…More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>


Rorschach Restructuring: PSA Taking Inland Revenue To Court Over Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>


Nuclear Disarmament: Nobel Peace Prize 2017 Awarded To ICAN

Congratulations from iCAN Aotearoa New Zealand to international iCAN, the other iCAN national campaigns and partner organisations, and the countless organisations and individuals who have worked so hard for a nuclear weapons-free world since 1945. More>>


Expenses: Waikato DHB CEO Resigns

An independent inquiry has identified that Dr Murray had spent more than the agreed $25K allocated for relocation costs, and other unauthorized expenses involving potential financial breaches of the chief executive’s obligations. More>>


Wellington.Scoop: Sad About The Trolley Buses?

The Regional Council’s MetLink is today spending money to tell us that it really loves Wellington’s trolley buses, even though they’re all being taken off our roads by the end of this month. More>>


Post-Election: Preliminary Coalition Talks Begin

New Zealand First will hold post-election preliminary discussions in Wellington with the National Party tomorrow morning and the Labour Party tomorrow afternoon. More>>




Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election