Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Right to know where food comes from denied

28 November 2005

Govt denying NZers right to know where food comes from

New Zealand consumers will be shocked by the Government's decision to deny them the right to know where their food comes from, Green Party Safe Food Spokesperson Sue Kedgley says.

Food Safety Minister Annette King announced today that the Government will not implement Food Standard Australia New Zealand's (FSANZ) standard for mandatory country-of-origin labelling (CoOL) of food, saying "mandatory CoOL is potentially an unnecessary barrier to international trade". The Australian government has already announced that it will adopt the measure.

"Consumers have a fundamental right to know where their food comes from. It is scandalous that the Government is denying them this because of its ideological fixation with free trade," Ms Kedgley says.

"Now we're facing a farcical situation where New Zealand food sent to Australia must be labelled as 'Made in New Zealand', but food coming the other way won't have to have 'Made in Australia' on it. This totally disadvantages New Zealand growers in both markets.

"New Zealand already has mandatory country-of-origin labelling for wine, clothing and footwear. We can find out where our jandals and tee shirts come from, but not where our legs of lamb or mangoes come from. Most of our major trading partner, including the USA, the European Union, Canada and Australia, already have mandatory country-of-origin labelling on imported food.

"This action also breaches the principles of the joint trans-Tasman food standards, namely that consumers shall have access to adequate information to make informed purchasing decisions. It is frankly bizarre that on the one hand the Government has promised to work on a Buy Kiwi-Made programme, and on the other is denying consumers the ability to find out via a label whether food has been produced locally or imported.

"Nor has the Government offered any credible reason for refusing to adopt the joint labelling standard. Under the FSANZ treaty, New Zealand can only pull out of a standard if there are 'exceptional health, safety, third country trade, environmental or cultural factors.' It hasn't offered any such reason.

"Clearly it is only refusing to implement the mandatory standard because it is putting its free trade agenda ahead of consumers' right to know.

"Many consumers want to buy New Zealand-grown produce to support local growers and avoid the environmental damage caused by transporting food long distance. But the Government is denying them the information they need to make such ethical choices. In the absence of a country-of-origin label, many consumers assume the produce they buy is locally produced and have no idea so much of it is imported.

"Surely we have a right to know whether we are eating an Australian leg of lamb or a New Zealand one? Or whether we are eating New Zealand or Chinese garlic? Imported produce is not tested to see whether it contains illegal pesticide, other residues or is fumigated with methyl bromide. That's yet another reason why consumers have a right to know whether their produce is imported or not," Ms Kedgley says.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>

ALSO:

More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>

ALSO:

Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>

ALSO:

Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>

ALSO:

General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news