Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Flavell: Parental Leave Amendment Bill

Parental Leave and Employment Protection (Paid Parental Leave for Self-Employed Persons) Amendment Bill 2005

Te Ururoa Flavell,

Member of Parliament for Waiariki

Tuesday 6 December 2005; Parliamentary Debate

The Maori Party believes there is no greater responsibility and honour than that of raising the next generations.

The privilege of parenting should be one that all parties seek to protect and to support - through a variety of means, including Bills such as this.

This is not to say that one must always be paid to undertake duties as a result of choosing to continue the existence of the Human Race.

And for the Maori Party - our desire for our people to go forth and multiply.

Our policy commitment is to strengthen and support whanau to take up their responsibilities for child rearing.

The Maori Party believes that parents, solo or couples, grandparents, aunties and uncles should have the choice to stay home and look after their children - that is their choice. We do not see this another welfare payment, in fact, it must not be. Because despite anything that might be said, welfare is a net that entangles one.

There are alternatives to welfare. We are supportive of the concept for reduced taxation if the family income is under the poverty line.

1.9 million taxpayers are on an income of $25,000 or less. These people are paying $3.5 billion in tax while the government is accumulating surpluses of $4 billion to $7 billion per year.

If we could use $1.75 billion of the $3.5 billion of those 1.9 million taxpayers, to give a tax discount of 50 percent to our low income people, this could achieve significant changes in the welfare and well-being of these people, and they could achieve choice.

Moving to the group that stands most to benefit, from this next Bill being introduced today.

The primary aim of the Bill is to amend the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Act 1987 to extend the 14 week paid parental leave scheme to self-employed individuals who are not currently covered.

It is interesting to note that women are significantly under-represented amongst the self-employed, particularly Maori women.

Industry NZ has found that only around 44% of applicants seeking Enterprise Awards grants were women and only 8% of applicants had identified themselves as Maori.

The December 2000 Household Labour Force Survey reported only 4500 self-employed Maori women, about 6.4% of the total number of self-employed women.

In addition, 1300 Maori women were self-employed and employing others, which was only 3.3% of the total number of women in this category.

Although we are very surprised to see Maori women are under-represented in this area - we should not be, because we know from bitter experience how difficult it is for Maori to access loan facilities to enable them to give substance to their entrepreneurial talents. They also lack the material assets from which they can borrow.

That Maori, and Maori women in particularly are entrepreneurial, can not be disputed.

The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) now covers 41 countries and is the largest survey of entrepreneurship undertaken in the world.

It is ironical that Maori are more likely to be necessity entrepreneurs (forced to start a business due to job loss or redundancy) than non-Maori or the global average. One has to ask, was it necessary to have a necessity to achieve international recognition as being entrepreneurial. While we are supportive of the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Bill, it might dull the entrepreneurial spirit, and that would be another irony.

Within the GEM Survey, more Maori women (83 per cent) than men (30 per cent) identify themselves as opportunity entrepreneurs (spotting a business opportunity).

Again, we question the irony in this international achievement. Maori women are successful at spotting a business opportunity, but perhaps up until the time of this legislation, were unable to act on the opportunity because they lacked resources - including parental leave and parental leave payments - to maintain a decent standard of living.

We are optimistic that this legislation will help to do something about this, and will ensure that these women can maintain their entrepreneurial spirit and enterprises by the assistance this Bill will give them.

Maori women were found to be remarkably more entrepreneurial than non-Maori New Zealand women and the global GEM female.

Female entrepreneurs account for 13 per cent of the general Maori population, compared to 8.7 per cent amongst non-Maori and 6.4 per cent of the GEM world.

Again, with all the success being heralded overseas, it is sobering that despite such talents, the Ministry of Social Development's latest social report reports that inequalities remain all too real.

It notes that hourly wage and salary rates for Maori still trail European rates - $13.76 against $16 - and literacy skills and educational achievement are also lower.

This is an indictment on our national and international standing, yet again.

It is to our national shame that Professor Stavenhagen, the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples, found only two weeks ago, that “There is also widespread concern that the gap in social and economic conditions is actually growing larger and that an increasing proportion of Maori are being left behind?”

The Government’s own figures reveal the unemployment rate for Maori has steadily increased over the last year from an actual rate of 8.3% in September 2004 to 9.1% in September 2005; with the unemployment rate for Pakeha which has steadily decreased over that same period.

All of these figures go to show, that despite the international recognition of the entrepreneurial spirit of Maori women, much still has to be done to address the inequities within our society.

So to this extent, the Maori Party supports the introduction of this Bill as being one such means to address these inequities.

The Bill is consistent with Maori Party kaupapa that underscores the importance of whanau financial security, and its implication of assistance for whanau when a parent is temporarily out of the paid workforce - paid out of the annual tax take that they have contributed to.

A question we have around this Bill, is whether it is possible for the Bill to include those in multiple and casual employment.

There are criteria contained that restrict eligibility to mean one must be working at least 10 hours per week in concurrent employment; and also that any break between consecutive types of work is only thirty days or less.

We would like to know what this will actually mean for self-employed persons in real terms.

Parenting is important. The Maori Party applauds this Bill as it supports parenting for those people who are also wealth creators, and creators of employment.

Tena tatou.


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Supreme Court: Worksafe Decision On Whittall Pike River Prosecution Unlawful

The question in issue on the appeal was whether WorkSafe New Zealand acted to give effect to an unlawful agreement of this nature when it offered no evidence on charges against Peter William Whittall for breaches of the Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992...

The Supreme Court... has found that the decision to offer no evidence was made under an unlawful agreement to stifle prosecution. It has granted a declaration to that effect. More>>

 

Cullen To Chair: Tax Working Group Terms Of Reference Announced

Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Revenue Minister Stuart Nash today announced the Terms of Reference for the Tax Working Group and that the Group will be chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them. More>>

ALSO:

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election