Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


"Soviet" Plan For Freshwater Inaction

"Soviet" Plan For Freshwater Inaction

Rodney Hide Monday, 10 April 2006

Press Releases - Environment & Conservation

Greater central control of fresh water, signalled in Labour's "Freshwater for the Future" strategy released today, means that pollution and inefficient water use will continue, says ACT Leader Rodney Hide.

"Government wants to centralise control over fresh water, putting privately owned, secure, tradable water rights out of the question", Mr Hide said.

"New Zealanders will be disappointed that instead of considering all the options, Labour has fallen back on its 'command and control' ideology.

"This is a strategy straight from the bankrupt former Soviet Union.

"All this report promises is a 'leadership group' of bureaucrats to 'identify', 'establish criteria', 'investigate' and 'develop strategies' over the next two years.

"Labour has not committed itself to taking a single definable action.

"All this document tells us is that Labour wants more centralised control over water allocation, when what New Zealanders need is the exact opposite.

"Environment Minister David Benson-Pope has blown an opportunity to introduce secure, tradable water rights.

"Privately held, secure, tradable water rights would mean that Kiwis owned and controlled their own access to water, with all the incentives of a property owner to properly use, protect and conserve their asset.

"Socialist governments around the world have found that nationalisation of natural resources leads to disaster. Our socialist Labour government seems destined to repeat the same mistake.

"By keeping freshwater access in the hands of bureaucrats, Labour ensures that inefficient use, pollution and mismanagement will continue", Mr Hide said.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Charlotte Graham: Empowering Communities To Act In A Disaster

The year of record-breaking natural disasters means that in the US, as in New Zealand, there’s a conversation happening about how best to run the emergency management sector and what philosophies best engage and protect communities in the event of a crisis.

How much of the responsibility for a community’s safety in a natural disaster is the Government’s, and how much can be left up to the community themselves? And how do we ensure none of our most vulnerable residents are left behind? More>>


CPAG Report: The Further Fraying Of The Welfare Safety Net

New Zealand’s welfare system has undergone a major transformation during the past three decades. This process has seriously thwarted the original intent of the system, which was to provide a decent standard of living for all New Zealanders in times of need... More>>


Signage, Rumble Strips, Barriers: Boost For State Highway Road Safety

Boost for road safety this summer Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter today announced a short term boost in road safety funding this summer and signalled a renewed focus from the Government on introducing safer speed limits. More>>


Risks & Adaptation: Cheaper To Cut Emissions Than Deal With Climate Change

The cost of climate change to New Zealand is still unknown, but a group of experts tasked with plugging the country's information gaps says it will likely be significant and it would be cheaper to cut greenhouse emissions than simply adapting to those changes. More>>


BPS HYEFU WYSIWYG: Labour's Budget Plans, Families Package

“Today we are announcing the full details of the Government’s Families Package. This is paid for by rejecting National’s tax cuts and instead targeting spending at those who need it most. It will lift 88,000 children out of poverty by 2021." More>>





Featured InfoPages