Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Turia: When 'same' actually means 'different'?

General Debate: When 'same' actually means 'different'?

Wednesday 10 May 2006

General Debate: Tariana Turia; Co-leader Maori Party

Tena koe, tena koe te whare.

Seven years ago in 1999, visiting public policy expert Dr Camara Jones noted:

“Understanding the impacts of socio-economic effects on health, and how this contributes to ethnic disparities in health, does not go far enough.

If we are really going to eliminate health disparities we need to understand the contemporary structural factors ….that is, we need to address the institutionalised racism if we are really going to make change”.

Seven weeks ago, the United Nations Special Rapporteur, Professor Rodolfo Stavenhagen, reported that:

“Significant racial inequalities continue to exist in health, housing, employment, education, social services and justice”.

Madam Speaker, the Māori Party is here today to say we will not wait another seven years, another seven weeks, another seven days, to put up with the price of racism.

This week, the reputable academic partners of Statistics New Zealand, Public Health Intelligence and the Wellington School of Medicine joined forces with the Ministry of Health to report that higher mortality for Māori relative to non-Māori cannot be explained purely by the over-representation of Māori in lower social classes.

This analysis can no longer be ignored or dismissed by a range of riddles that diminish research if it comes from the United Nations; from an anthropologist; from an international expert.

This is New Zealand’s aptly named public health intelligence which is

urging us to seek explanations for the ethnic disparities in mortality.

Decades of Disparity III reports that the impact of racism on ethnic inequalities in health is likely to be mediated through both socio-economic (institutionalised racism) and non socio-economic (inter-personal and internalized racism) pathways.

In essence, this final report in a series of three examining disparities between Māori and non-Māori from the early 1980s to the mid 1990s reinforces the impact of personal, cultural and institutional racism in this nation.

And we are not alone.

Another reputable source, the British Medical Journal, describes a growing literature showing an association between racism, morbidity and mortality. The BMJ editorial states:

“Cross sectional studies in the United States report associations between perceived racial discrimination and hypertension, birth weight, self related health, and days off sick. In a recent study from the United Kingdom victims of discrimination were more likely to have respiratory illness, hypertension, a long term limiting illness, anxiety, depression, and psychosis”.

It therefore stands to reason that countering racism must be considered a major public health issue.

If the R word is too scary, think about these three questions:

* Why is survival from cancer, even adjusting for age and stage; lower among Māori than non-Māori?

* Why do Māori and Pacific people have similar rates of coronary artery bypass grafts and angioplasty as European people; despite having greater need?

* Why is it that although the prevalence for paediatric asthma is similar for Maori and non-Maori; Maori children have:

- more severe symptoms when they present to the health provider;

- require hospitalisation twice as often as non-Maori;

- and are less likely to receive adequate asthma education or even be prescribed preventive medication?

The analysis is clear, consistent, and convincing.

Differences in access to, and quality of, health care, create different outcomes for Māori compared to non-Māori.

Considering racism to be a cause is an important step in developing a research agenda and response from health services. And it is about time.

We must start getting real about the links between racism and health if we are really and genuinely committed to preventing disease, prolonging life, and promoting health. There is no time to wait. Only then will the Maori Party be able to accept the catch-cry of ‘one law for all’.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

Entering into its third decade of operation, the Scoop news ecosystem is set to undergo another phase of transformation and evolution.

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>


Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>


United Future History: "All Good Things Must End"

'We’re extremely proud of what we’ve achieved over the past 15 years, working alongside the government of the day, both National and Labour.' Mr Light told members on Monday. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The TPP Outcome, And The Hobbit Law

Somehow the Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal has come lurching back from the dead – and as predicted in this column last week, the member countries gathered in Vietnam have announced a deal in broad principle, shunted aside until a later date the stuff on which they don’t agree, and declared victory. More>>

Agreeing To Differ: Greens Maintain Opposition To TPPA
“The Green Party has long opposed the TPPA. The new proposed deal, which came out of the weekend’s talks, still contains key ISDS concessions to corporations that put our democracy at risk, so our position remains the same,” said Green Party trade spokesperson Golriz Ghahraman. More>>


Monitoring Report: A New Chapter For Children’s Rights In New Zealand?

The Children’s Commissioner is calling on the country to embrace children’s rights to ensure their overall well-being. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election