Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

Goff: Address to APEC meeting on WTO negotiations

Minister of Trade

Speech Notes

2 June Address to APEC meeting on WTO negotiations

Intervention to meeting of APEC Ministers Responsible for Trade

Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam

The World Trade Organisation negotiations are at a critical stage. We have until the end of the year to complete the whole package if we are not to lose the TPA window and possibly political momentum.

If we miss that window it will be years before we have another chance. We should not be complacent about the risks of failure, and its costs in terms of development, foregone benefits of trade liberalisation, and the future of the multilateral system.

To avoid that, we have to have the modalities finalised well before the northern summer break. We have just about run out of time.

There has been some forward movement on issues since Hong Kong, and some of us had an opportunity to discuss the situation last week in the margins of the OECD ministerial meeting in Paris.

There have been signals, for example from the G10 and from the EU, that they can increase proposed tariff cuts on agricultural products. The US has indicated some flexibility on further reducing domestic support. Brazil, as a key member of the G20, has signalled a willingness to go beyond its earlier position by increasing the level of cuts it could consider for industrial tariffs.

While we are still short of a basis for agreement, the offers show that at the political level, key players have been prepared to make a serious effort to find a way past the main sticking points.

We have heard this morning from WTO Director-General Lamy on the process he intends for the month of June, culminating in a Ministerial Green Room meeting.

There is a lot of work still to be done in Geneva on a range of issues including rules, development agenda and services. But the immediate challenge is to finalise agriculture and NAMA (Non-Agricultural Market Access) modalities. And the critical issues there revolve around the level of ambition.

When we talk about ambition, the basic test is whether the round delivers some real market opening; real new trade flows, and real cuts in spending on trade-distorting subsidies.

This implies changes in domestic policies in politically sensitive areas for a number of countries. They carry political risks. But the greatest risk for all of us is failure to conclude the round and make meaningful advances. To get a breakthrough countries have to show their constituents that there is gain as well as pain ? and that the pain is going to be shared fairly.

It requires parallel movement across the core issues: market access and domestic support in agriculture, and NAMA. All members will ultimately need to be part of it ? but the initial understandings have to be worked up among smaller groups including the big importers and exporters and the big subsidisers.

So where does that leave us as APEC Ministers on what we can best do to contribute to the process?

Our meeting today is the largest gathering of Ministers ahead of Geneva in June. We have to send a strong political message in our APEC stand-alone statement on the WTO that we are committed to reaching a deal in the Doha process that delivers a high level of ambition. We must also indicate that we are also prepared to face up to the hard political decisions required to make that a reality.

In agriculture we need to complete and lock-in the progress we have been making on export competition ? including on the elimination of agricultural export subsidies. And we need to come up with an agreement that provides for an effective cut in overall domestic support.

However, the pre-requisite to a successful outcome is market access in agricultural and non-agricultural goods. We are not here today to negotiate the details of the June outcome. But as APEC economies that stand to benefit considerably from further market opening, we must send a clear political signal on that issue.

Many countries have sensitivities and are looking for flexibilities to deal with them, especially developing country members. We understand their concerns and we need to try to help the adjustment process for developing countries in particular.

But development will not be served if mechanisms like sensitive products and special products are simply used to prevent any real market access. That would contradict the Doha mandate.

So let's send a strong message from this meeting about the importance of ambition. And let's back that up by facing up to the tough political decisions at home to allow us to bring new flexibilities to the negotiating table and make sure that Geneva and the Doha Round can be a success.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

CPAG Report: The Further Fraying Of The Welfare Safety Net

New Zealand’s welfare system has undergone a major transformation during the past three decades. This process has seriously thwarted the original intent of the system, which was to provide a decent standard of living for all New Zealanders in times of need...

In 2017 it is not unusual for families to be living in their cars, in garages, or in substandard boarding houses. Food banks are unable to meet the soaring demands from not only beneficiaries but, increasingly, the working poor. Private charities, such as KidsCan and Variety, are overwhelmed by the demand from poor families for basic necessities. More>>

ALSO:

 
 

Risks & Adaptation: Cheaper To Cut Emissions Than Deal With Climate Change

The cost of climate change to New Zealand is still unknown, but a group of experts tasked with plugging the country's information gaps says it will likely be significant and it would be cheaper to cut greenhouse emissions than simply adapting to those changes. More>>

ALSO:

BPS HYEFU WYSIWYG: Labour's Budget Plans, Families Package

“Today we are announcing the full details of the Government’s Families Package. This is paid for by rejecting National’s tax cuts and instead targeting spending at those who need it most. It will lift 88,000 children out of poverty by 2021." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Defence Spending, Alabama, And Dolly Parton

The spending lavished on Defence projects to meet the risks that could maybe, possibly, theoretically face New Zealand in future is breath-taking, given how successive governments have been reluctant to spend even a fraction of those amounts on the nation’s actual social needs. More>>

ALSO:

Members' Bills: End Of Life Choice Bill Passes First Reading

The End of Life Choice Bill in the name of David Seymour has been sent to a select committee for consideration by 76 votes to 44. It is the third time Parliament has voted on the issue in recent decades and the first time such a Bill has made it over the first hurdle. More>>

ALSO:

State Sector: MPI Survives Defrag Of Portfolios

The Ministry for Primary Industries will not be split under the new government, but will instead serve as an overarching body for four portfolio-based entities focused on fisheries, forestry, biosecurity and food safety. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages