Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Flavell: Resource Mangmt (Security for Costs) Bill

Resource Management (Security for Costs) Amendment Bill

Te Ururoa Flavell, Maori Party Spokesperson for Environment

Wednesday 14 June 2006

The Maori Party is speaking to the Resource Management (Security for Costs) Amendment Bill informed by our understanding of CIR.

That’s not CIR for Citizen Initiated Referendum - although that certainly would not be such a bad idea.

It’s CIR for Cultural Impact Reporting - as defined under the fourth schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991.

In this section, the requirements for assessing environmental effects are set out. Cultural Impact Reporting looks at the spiritual or cultural or other special values for present or future generations.

What the Resource Management (Security for Costs) Amendment Bill

does in effect, is to add a new layer of costs to an already expensive process - the process of taking a case against a company.

The Bill will require that claimants can sign that they are able to put up the money before the case can go to Court.

And it’s not small change.

The cultural impact assessment of this new provision then, is that if we are seriously committed to due process, to ensure all people receive a fair hearing in front of the law, then this Bill does nothing to enhance that right.

The Resource Management Act 1991 states that " the relationship of Maori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral lands, water, sites, waahi tapu and other taonga" is a matter of national importance which councils must recognise and provide for.

A matter of national importance - which with this amendment Bill would never see the light of day through prohibitive costs.

It is a matter of national importance, a matter of natural justice, and a matter of environmental equity that demands we oppose this Bill.

There are two other factors that have emerged through our cultural impact assessment of this Bill.

Firslty, the issue of irrelevance.

The purpose of the Bill is to “limit the vexatious and frivolous objections to applications for development”.

Yet in a search of the environmental rulings between 1998 to 2003, we have unearthed two, and only two, instances which one could define as either vexatious and frivolous.

This can’t be right, we thought, so we approached the Ministry for the Environment.

We were told, quite clearly, that they have not undertaken any assessment, let alone a cultural impact assessment, of how many cases could fall into the vexatious and frivolous category. Their response was that, at its best, estimates could only be anecdotal.

The issue of relevance being discounted, we thus turn to the issue of necessity.

And what we found was that the RMA Amendment Act 2005, actually, makes this new Bill redundant.

There is a clause in the RMA Amendment Act which will prevent such cases getting to Court by the direct intervention of local bodies. This will come into force in August 2007.

Section 41C of the principal Act is amended by the addition of specific subsections, including the new section 41C (5) which direct that a submission can be struck out if the submission or part of it is frivolous or vexatious.

The costs of litigation are already adversely impacting upon a group of people who are already over-represented amongst communities where poverty is endemic.

‘Security for costs’ can be understood as yet another clever construct of the Crown to constrain tangata whenua from their right to challenge developments.

Sitting alongside other local government situations where Maori are being prevented from doing their own developments, it is at the very least a case of dé jà vu, or worse yet, another instance of racism.

Putting it another way, we wonder if the mere presentation of the Resource Management (Security for Costs) Amendment Bill is actually the real legislation that is both frivolous and vexatious.

The Maori Party will not be supporting this Bill.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Wellington: Predator Free Capital Plan

Wellington City Council (WCC), the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) and NEXT Foundation, today announced a joint collaboration to make Wellington the first Predator Free capital city in the world. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Judith Collins’ Efforts At Self Correction

Thousands of prisoners currently in prison may be entitled to an earlier release than expected – and compensation – because Corrections has incorrectly calculated their term of imprisonment. Unless of course, the government buries its mistakes by changing the law and retro-actively getting itself off the hook… More>>


More Justice & Corrections

Sector Opposes Bill: Local Government Bill Timeframe Extended

The Minister of Local Government Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has asked the Select Committee to extend the report back date for the Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2). More>>


Breed Laws Don’t Work: Vets On New National Dog Control Plan

It is pleasing therefore to see Louise Upston Associate Minister for Local Government calling for a comprehensive solution... However, relying on breed specific laws to manage dog aggression will not work. More>>


Not Waiting On Select Committee: Green Party Releases Medically-Assisted Dying Policy

“Adults with a terminal illness should have the right to choose a medically assisted death,” Green Party health spokesperson Kevin Hague said. “The Green Party does not support extending assisted dying to people who aren't terminally ill because we can’t be confident that this won't further marginalise the lives of people with disabilities." More>>


General Election Review: Changes To Electoral Act Introduced

More effective systems in polling places and earlier counting of advanced votes are on their way through proposed changes to our electoral laws, Justice Minister Amy Adams says. More>>

Get More From Scoop



Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news