Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 


Brash: Address to the National Party Conference

Don Brash MP
National Party Leader


Brash: Address to the National Party Conference

Christchurch Convention centre, Christchurch.

Madam President, members of the National Party, my parliamentary colleagues.

Four years ago this week I was elected to serve my country as a National Party Member of the New Zealand Parliament.

Exactly 1,000 days ago today my caucus colleagues accorded me the privilege of electing me leader of this great party, the most successful political party in our country’s history.

And in the past 1,000 days, I hope you’ll agree, we’ve made more than a little progress.

At this annual conference, you have justifiably looked back at the achievements of the past year, and in particular you’ve reflected on our best election result ever in the MMP era:

We now have a highly talented caucus, which has grown from 27 to 48 in number.

We won half of the nation’s general constituency seats, and the Party Vote in 36 electorates.

We have a hugely skilled and experienced front bench.

And we have a party that is now poised and ready to assume the reins of office.

But, fellow members of the National Party, having appropriately thanked you all yesterday for your outstanding efforts, there’s another message I have for you about the 2005 election:

That was yesterday.

In 2006, at this annual Conference, we’re not about yesterday.

We’re about tomorrow.

Somewhere in the second half of 2008, New Zealanders will go to the polls.

After nine long years of Labour Governments, boosted by the most buoyant international conditions in decades, the party will be over, the hangover setting in, the scale of the headache becoming throbbingly apparent.

After nine long years, New Zealanders will have to confront the reality that the average after-tax wage across the Tasman, which in 1999 was 20% ahead of the average after-tax wage in New Zealand, will be around 40% ahead.

After nine long years of new studies, new reports, new acronyms, and new committees, virtually none of the key infrastructure – none of the key highways, new power stations, new transmission lines – will have been established on which to build a faster growing economy.

After nine long years, and billions of dollars in extra health spending, the number of elective operations will have changed hardly at all from what we achieved in the late nineties, and the waiting list will still hover uncomfortably close to the 200,000 mark.

After nine long years, the number of bureaucrats in the education system, at present up by more than a third since 1999, will have increased further, while the scandal around the NCEA and the waste in the tertiary sector will continue, and 20%, yes 20%, of New Zealand children will still be coming out of primary school unable to read or write.

And after nine of the luckiest years New Zealand has had for many decades, in terms of international trade, the number of New Zealanders on the sickness and invalids benefits, at present up 50% on the position in 1999, will certainly be up even further, with the number of working-age adults on a benefit of some kind projected to be over 300,000.

And if New Zealanders haven’t got the message by now, and most of them have, they will certainly have got it by the time of the next election:

Slippery political manoeuvring by Helen Clark and her coterie of turbo-charged political spin merchants hasn’t solved any of the serious social and economic challenges that our country must confront.

And they won’t.

Let me be very clear about this:

Teflon-coated politics won’t close the growing gap in relative incomes between New Zealand and Australia.

Armies of spin merchants won’t get hospital treatment for the tens of thousands of New Zealanders who need it, or teach young New Zealanders how to read or write.

And lofty political rhetoric, new committees and fancy acronyms won’t get New Zealand new motorways, new power plants, a decent transmission network, or world class telecommunications services.

These things, ladies and gentlemen – the tools for a successful, faster growing economy – are not the product of political spin, they are the result of honest analysis, hard work, clear-sighted decision-making, and businesslike execution.

And, by 2008, New Zealand is going to need tonnes of it.

Looking ahead, we have both an opportunity and a responsibility over these next two years.

The opportunity we have is to continue to build support out in the community – support that will ultimately lead in 2008 to the election of a National-led government.

I’m confident that we’re on track to make the most of this opportunity.

With this opportunity, however, comes a responsibility to the people of New Zealand.

And it’s a straightforward one.

National can’t simply wait for Labour to self-destruct or run out of ideas. Rather, we must strive to meet the high hopes and expectations voters rightly have of us as the party that’s the alternative government of New Zealand.

As I travel up and down this country, I get a consistent message: people are tired of Labour. They’re tired of a government that uses their money on programmes like Working for Families and then expects them to be grateful for it.

They’re tired of a government that’s been in office seven long years yet still refuses to accept responsibility for anything that goes wrong!

As I travel up and down this country, I also get a consistent message about our party: there are high expectations out there of National.

Voters expect that, as this three-year term progresses, National will actively explain why it deserves to be trusted to be the next government of New Zealand.

They want to know about our vision for the future, and they want to know what the next National Government will do in key policy areas.

This conference is part of that process.

There are, in my judgment, two fundamental tests any voter will use to assess the relative merits of a political party.

They can be summarised as “trust” and “direction”.

Trust. It’s not a long word. It’s not difficult to say or to spell. But for the Clark/Peters Government, it sure is a hard word to live up to.

Shortly after the election we all became aware of the most flagrant breach of the electoral law by Labour grossly over-spending its legal limit, and using taxpayers’ money to fund their infamous Pledgecard in clear breach of the Parliamentary rules to boot.

Just this week we’ve had the latest chapter in the Taito Phillip Field saga.

I don’t intend to dwell on this today.

I simply make the point that New Zealand politics has been free of corruption for many decades – in a way that’s almost unique in the world.

And now we have a Prime Minister who’ll turn a blind eye to allegations of serious corruption – who’ll actually contrive to ensure that allegations of corruption against a member of her Government are not investigated because holding the baubles of office has become more important to her than the preservation of the integrity of public life in this country.

Is it any wonder the public doesn’t easily trust politicians?

In making up their mind about whether or not to trust a political party with their vote, my sense is that people ask themselves one question.

Does the party have the leadership, and the strength in its ranks below the leadership, to make the huge number of weighty decisions voters of necessity put in the hands of their elected officials?

Let’s look at leadership for a moment.

In my view, New Zealand needs a leader who has both a vision for New Zealand and the ability to craft policies designed to achieve that vision.

A leader is not someone whose sole focus in life is about self-preservation, or who’s more concerned about how they’ll look in the history books than about what’s in the best interests of New Zealand.

A leader is someone who celebrates the fact the team has bench strength at every level. A leader is not intimidated by the fact that others will one day have the ability and drive to assume the top mantle.

A leader admits mistakes and learns from them.

A leader is not someone whose first port of call in a storm is to find some defenceless bureaucrat or police officer to blame, and then abandons them to carry the can.

A leader does what’s right, not what’s convenient, or what the focus groups tell him or her. By definition, he or she leads, and does so with an appropriate sense of determination, vision and courage.

I can and do provide that style of leadership and it’s a style this country desperately lacks.

And I do it supported by the strongest, most able, caucus this great National Party has produced in its 70-year history.

The support for this parliamentary team is provided by a party organisation that’s been the foundation of our great party since its inception, but one we’ve constantly sought to enhance and refine.

In the past couple of years, we’ve changed the constitution of the party more fundamentally than at any time in our history, and we now have a structure that is admirably suited to the needs of a modern political party.

So we have the leadership, the parliamentary team, and the party organisation. We have a team this country can trust.

The second question that voters ask of political parties relates to the direction they propose to take the country in. What are your policies? What’s your vision?

There are always those who believe the only way we can win the Treasury benches is by trying to “out-Labour Labour”. If Labour wins office by taking $25,000 in tax off a successful hardworking Kiwi and bribing five voters with $5,000 each, perhaps National has to ‘up’ the stakes, and take $30,000 in tax off a successful hardworking Kiwi and bribe five voters with $6,000 each – or six voters with $5,000 each?

But that way surely lies disaster. Not only do we erode the spirit of personal responsibility and self-reliance on which this great country was built, but ultimately those who are more and more heavily taxed to finance the political bribes decide they’ve paid enough, and either arrange their affairs so they can substantially avoid tax or leave for places where they can pay much less tax. And of course plenty of affluent New Zealanders have done exactly that.

Or perhaps we need to out-bribe Labour in some other way. I was told just a few days ago that Labour’s interest-free student loan bribe had probably won the election for Labour and that if National wants to win next time we have to think of something similar – perhaps like abolishing GST on food.

Would that make sense in terms of New Zealand’s long-term prosperity? Of course not. It would hugely increase the compliance costs in the GST system, would open the door to demands to exempt lots of other goods and services from GST – adding still further to the complexity, and almost certainly increasing the rate of GST – and would forego a large amount of revenue for nothing but short-term political gain.

Let me be very clear: I’m determined to see National win the next election, but if you want me to do that by doing things that will damage New Zealand’s long-term interests, count me out.

There will be four strong pillars to the nation that the next National Government is intent on building and these will be reflected in our policies.

First, we must have strong economic growth and policies to encourage that growth – lower taxes to encourage New Zealanders to get ahead under their own steam; much better infrastructure, especially in transport and electricity; lower compliance costs; greater encouragement for research and development; and a culture of aspiration and enterprise.

Secondly, we must have a first-class education system, delivering a high standard of basic literacy and numeracy to all those in primary school, appropriate qualifications at secondary and tertiary level, and a high level of parental choice about where their children are educated.

Thirdly, we must have a safe and secure community – a community where law abiding citizens everywhere can go about their daily lives free from the fear of being a victim of violent crime; a community where police resources are adequate to deal not just with the most serious violent crimes but also with the thousands of property crimes which currently seem beyond the capacity of the police to deal with.

Fourthly, we must have a safety net so that all those in genuine need are supported by the community – but a safety net which no longer provides a hammock to the thousands of working-aged adults who should be making some kind of contribution back to the community which supports them.

And those four pillars will have a foundation, which is equally important:

It’s an old and very simple concept called One Law for All – a belief that all New Zealanders, regardless of background or ethnicity, are equal before the law.

As you will recognise the four pillars haven’t changed since the election last year. There’s absolutely no reason why they should have changed.

There will of course be other parts of the structure. Well before we go into the next election, for example, we will have a strong policy on health, making it clear that National is committed to getting better value for the enormous amounts of taxpayers’ money spent on healthcare, and we won’t hesitate to use private providers where that can improve health and reduce suffering.

We will likewise have a strong policy on the environment to make it crystal clear that, though National is strongly committed to increasing our growth rate, we will never do that at the expense of our environment.

Ladies and gentlemen, New Zealand currently has a Government that thinks that this is as good as it gets.

The next government of New Zealand, the next National Government, will be committed to doing much better.

In recent weeks, many of you will have watched the appalling, gut-wrenching, coverage of the death of the Kahui twins.

That coverage serves as a reminder of just how much more we need to do to create a society where every New Zealander starts life with a decent chance of fulfilling their potential.

How much more we need to do to free some New Zealanders from the sub-human underclass of drugs and booze, criminality and despair.

How much more we must ask of our education system, our police, and our courts.

How much more our tax and welfare system must do to create a culture of aspiration, ambition, and participation that embraces all New Zealanders.

None of us in this room today should be complacent about how difficult the task that lies ahead will be.

Nine years of Labour’s wasteful spending and bloated bureaucracy will take time to fix, but fix it we will!

I think forward to my vision of what New Zealand could be like after two terms of a National Government in 2014, about the time my youngest child will be leaving university.

• We will have built a multicultural country where people of all races are treated with dignity and are equal before the law.

• We will have built a country where success in sport, the arts, in science, and in business is celebrated.

• We will have built a country where men and women, young and old, gay and straight, are treated with courtesy and respect.

• We will have built a country where it’s acceptable to want to do well, acceptable to aspire to get ahead, and unacceptable for able-bodied people to be indefinitely dependent on a hand-out.

• We will have built a country where living standards are rapidly approaching the living standards enjoyed by our cousins in Australia.

• We will have built a country where every person, regardless of income, can get access to high quality education and healthcare.

• We will have built a country where the rule of law is firmly upheld, and where we have rooted out the culture of domestic violence and child abuse which so disgraces our country now.

One of my favourite quotes comes from an American called the Rev. William Boetker. It’s so good it’s often mistakenly attributed to Abraham Lincoln.

I want to quote it because it sums up National’s philosophy:

“You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.

“You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage-payer.

“You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.

“You cannot build character and courage by taking away a man's initiative and independence.

“You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.”

I’m confident that, were Mr Boetker alive today, he would want to extend his comments to include women as well, and were he a New Zealander he would be a member of the National Party!

As you prepare to leave this conference today, I want to leave you with this thought.

Seventy years ago a group of New Zealanders concerned about the country’s future under a Labour Government joined together - members of the Reform and Liberal Parties - to form the National Party.

It’s a party that for 70 years has survived and prospered and served our country well.

It’s a party that knows that together we can achieve a better New Zealand and a party that won’t give up until it’s delivered it.

It’s a party that knows how to win.

So my message to you today is a simple one.

We have the team, the policies and party support.

Together we can and we will win, so let’s get out there and do it.

Thank you.


Ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Also, Loan Interest: Productivity Commission On Tertiary Education

Key recommendations include better quality control; making it easier for students to transfer between courses; abolishing University Entrance; enabling tertiary institutions to own and control their assets; making it easier for new providers to enter the system; and facilitating more and faster innovation by tertiary education providers... More>>

ALSO:

Higher Payments: Wellington Regional Council Becomes A Living Wage Employer

Councillor Sue Kedgley said she was delighted that the Wellington Regional Council unanimously adopted her motion to become a Living Wage employer, making it the first regional council in New Zealand to do so. More>>

ALSO:

Scoop Images:
Dame Patsy Reddy Sworn In As Governor-General

This morning Dame Patsy Reddy was sworn in as the New Zealand Realm’s 21st Governor-General. The ceremony began with a pōwhiri to welcome Dame Patsy and her husband Sir David Gascoigne to Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

Ruataniwha: DOC, Hawke's Bay Council Developer Take Supreme Court Appeal

The Department of Conservation and Hawke's Bay Regional Investment Company (HBRIC) are appealing to the Supreme Court over a conservation land swap which the Court of Appeal halted. More>>

ALSO:

With NZ's Marama Davidson: Women’s Flotilla Leaves Sicily – Heading For Gaza

Women representing 13 countries spanning five continents began their journey yesterday on Zaytouna-Oliva to the shores of Gaza, which has been under blockade since 2007. On board are a Nobel Peace Laureate, three parliamentarians, a decorated US diplomat, journalists, an Olympic athlete, and a physician. A list of the women with their background can be found here. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Key Style Of Crisis Management

At Monday’s post Cabinet press conference Key was in his finest wide- eyed “Problem? What problem?” mode. No, there wasn’t really a problem that top MPI officials had been at odds with each other over the meaning of the fisheries policy and how that policy should be pursued... More>>

ALSO:

Mt Roskill: Greens Will Not Stand In Likely Post-Goff By-Election

“The Green Party’s priority is changing the Government in 2017, and as part of that we’ve decided that we won’t stand a candidate in the probable Mt Roskill by-election... This decision shows the Memorandum of Understanding between Labour and the Green Party is working." More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parliament
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news