Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

UF Leader's Letter Field 'n' Parliamentary Funding

United Future Leader's Letter – Taito Philip Field and Parliamentary Funding


Taito Philip Field

Parliament has not been a place to be proud of in recent weeks. The aftermath of the Phillip Field saga; the row over parliamentary spending and the appalling behaviour of the two main parties in the debating chamber have all contributed to the worst period in politics that I can recall in over 20 years as an MP.

It is time to pull back from the brink, before the reputation of our parliamentary democracy is damaged beyond repair. That will take calm heads, and a commitment to the greater good of our country, rather than just the pursuit of party politics as usual. Sadly, I am not yet confident there is sufficient will in the two old parties for that to happen. Of course, that does not mean that the issues that have given rise to all this are unimportant, or should be swept under the carpet.

As far as the Field case is concerned, I think it has been badly handled . The Ingram Report took far too long to complete, cost the taxpayer far too much, and was far too inconclusive in its findings to be of any value. It was certainly not the vindication Mr Field claimed. An independent Police inquiry as is now underway is the proper way to address the issues, including the matters of criminality, and to determine the course that flows from there. As for Mr Field, his reputation and political career are in tatters, and it is difficult to see how he can possibly continue to serve as MP for Mangere.

Parliamentary Funding

The issue of parliamentary spending is equally vexed. United Future has always been utterly scrupulous in its parliamentary spending. We have deliberately had every advertisement or leaflet for which we have sought parliamentary funding checked by the Parliamentary Service prior to publication, and in cases where questions have been raised we have either modified the item in question accordingly, or not proceeded.

On the few occasions there have been external complaints against us, successive Speakers of the House have always found us to have been acting within the rules. Imagine then our shock to have received the Auditor-General's preliminary finding that tens of thousands of dollars of our spending was illegal. Like other parties, we are stunned and puzzled by this turn of events, given that we have been so careful to follow the rules as we understood them. Obviously, there needs to be clarification of the rules to overcome this problem and ensure there are no repetitions in the future

But the more immediate question that deserves an answer which has not yet been forthcoming is how is it that the interpretations of the rules by the parties and the Parliamentary Service have obviously been so at variance with the interpretation now made by the Auditor-General. The inference, which is rapidly gaining credence in the wider community, that all parties and the MPs within them are corrupt is as wrong as it is destructive of our individual reputations, something I resent bitterly.

Requiring parties to pay back the expenditure ultimately deemed to be illegal, no matter that it was incurred in good faith, is undoubtedly the popular and obvious solution, but that is fraught with some difficulties. In most cases, parties, particularly the smaller ones, will struggle to find that amount of money, and will in turn be severely hampered in their ability to raise the funds necessary to fight the next election. Some parties may be able to call on sympathetic benefactors to bail them out, although that is probably a less likely outcome.

Either way, the real loser will be our parliamentary democracy. The Auditor-General's zeal may well have the unintended long-term consequence of neutering the newer parties and concentrating power back into the hands of the two established parties. That was hardly what people voted for when they voted for MMP.

To go back to my opening point, it would surely be the ultimate irony if the outcome of the Auditor-General's inquiry was to return political power by stealth to the old duopoly whose behaviour in recent weeks has provided the strongest argument why more fundamental political reform is required.

It’s conference time again and now, more than ever, we need your energy and support. The United Future party conference will be at the Arts Centre of Christchurch, corner of Hereford Street & Rolleston Ave Saturday 4 November 2006, 10am – 5pm. A registration form can be downloaded from the website www.unitedfuture.org.nz. As you can see in the areas of tax reform and behaviour in the House, the smaller parties can exercise considerable influence.

With your support, we can be even stronger and more Influential. More from the strange but true files: September 11th is a grim day for politicians. While it is now immortalised as the anniversary of the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York, it is also the day on which many former world leaders have met their maker. Pakistan's first Prime Minister Mohammed Ali Jinnah, former South African Prime Minister Jan Smuts, former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, and Chile's President Salvador Allende all died on this day. Best regards

Peter Dunne

Click here for PDF version:

Peter Dunne Leader's letter 11.09.06

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The New Pike River Agency (And The Air Strike Wing)

Much of the sympathy the public still feels for the families of the Pike River miners has been sustained by the sense that the previous government – let alone the mining company and the processes of receivership and litigation – has never dealt honestly, or fairly, with them.

Finally, yesterday’s announcement by the Ardern government that a new state agency will be set up to assess and plan the manned re-entry to the mine (on a set timetable) goes a long way to meeting the families’ remaining request: that they be enabled, if at all possible, to bury their loved ones. More>>

 

Not Going Swimmingly: Contractor Cut, New Dates For Christchurch Sports Centre

“As an incoming Minister, I have been conducting a thorough review of progress on the Anchor projects and to learn of a $75 million budget blowout on this project was very disappointing..." More>>

ALSO:

Tertiary: Allowances, Loan Living Costs To Get Boost

“From 1 January, student allowance base rates and the maximum amount students can borrow for living costs will rise by a net $50 a week,” says Education Minister Chris Hipkins... further adjusted from 1 April 2018 in line with any increase in the CPI. More>>

ALSO:

Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>

ALSO:

Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election