Parliament

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search

 

The Mapp Report: Labour plays by a new rules

The Mapp Report

www.waynemapp.co.nz

Labour plays by a new set of rules

This week Parliament passed the bill that left Parties with no obligation to pay back any of the $1.17 million in election spending, which was previously found to be unlawful spending in the Auditor General’s Report.

On Wednesday October 18 I gave a speech in Parliament regarding the Appropriation (Parliamentary Expenditure) bill before the bill was put to a vote. The following is the text from my speech. Parliamentary speeches are not read from text, but are given in debate form without notes.

Test of honour

It is the fundamental right of all citizens to hold the Government to account. We do not do that just through elections. As citizens we also want to know whether Governments and parliamentarians are lawful – whether they obey the law. That is one of the fundamental checks in our democracy.

There is no more powerful a case on that than Fitzgerald vs Muldoon when, back in 1975, the Government of the day sought to overturn superannuation by a non-legislative procedure. The courts were absolutely emphatic that one cannot do that – that one must pass law to establish the law of the nation. In essence, the same principle arises here, does it not?

Surely it is fair to demand to know whether the actions of the Labour Party last year followed the law – whether it breached its Appropriation bills or whether it did not. Surely that is a fundamental right of citizens in holding the Government to account.

So what does the Government say?

The Government is saying: “No, we don’t want the courts to judge our actions. We’re going to pretend – because that is what we are actually doing today”.

Let us not fool the public here – that what was unlawful is now lawful, as if it never happened. The public will not be fooled by that. The public will judge the parliamentary Labour Party and its followers, the New Zealand First Party and United Future, harshly for that. They know that the fundamental right of citizens is to have their cases heard and to have judgements from the courts that in essence say: “Were these actions” – the actions of the parliamentary Labour Party last year – “unlawful”. It is a fundamental right of citizens to know that.

But this Government is saying that it is going to take a highhanded approach and remove the right of citizens to know whether the Government’s actions were lawful, as if there were never an issue in the first place.

Labour takes one step towards Third World status

Labour’s attitude is reprehensible, because Western democracies – countries we model ourselves on – are countries of law. Our actions are judged by independent courts. But in this case the Government says “No”. It is going to reduce this country to the level of a Third World democracy, where courts are routinely browbeaten by the lawmakers of the day, and that is, of course, what the legislation does. The Government is saying to the courts and to the citizens that their rights do not matter. It is saying that it has absolute power and will use it ruthlessly to its own end.

Face the music

The public will judge it harshly for that. If those members are true to their word – if they believe in the rule of law – then they will be willing to be judged. They will be willing to have their actions submitted to an independent test of the courts. They can make their submission to the courts. They have, in fact, filed a statement of claim. They can have the judges of the High Court, the Court of Appeal, and their Supreme Court adjudicate to find out whether this Government, this parliamentary Labour Party, actually obeyed the law. Surely that is a fundamental right of all citizens.

20 October 2006


Dr Wayne Mapp


Visit my website for more information at: www.waynemapp.co.nz


ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Peters/Ardern Triumph

There are a lot of good reasons to feel joyful about this outcome. It is what so many young voters – the best hope for the country’s future – wanted.

Far more important than the implications for the Economy Gods (is the dollar up or down?) the outcome will also mean many, many vulnerable New Zealanders will have a better life over the next three years at least.

Yet the desire for change was in the majority, across the country... More>>

ALSO:

.

 
 

Submissions Summary: The People's Commission On Public Media

This Summary is a preliminary report from the People’s Commission. It brings together views and aspirations of the hundreds of people who made submissions, attended public meetings, filled out the online survey and made speeches to our Panel. More>>

Housing Plans: Protest Over Ihumatao Development

Ihumatao in Mangere, next to the airport in Auckland, holds the archaeological remains of 1000 years of food production; from when Maori first landed in the area, through to early European settler agriculture and right up until today. More>>

ALSO:

Negotiations: What Does Winston Peters Want His Legacy To Be?

A lot of people in New Zealand seem to resent Winston Peters and the power that he appears to have. “Appears” being the operative word.. More>>

ALSO:

Contains Highly Colloquial Language: Your F**king Guide To Government Formation

The following message is in no way endorsed by the Electoral Commission. They are f**king done with this election. More>>

NZ Emissions Up 50% 1990-2013: Report Confirms CLimate Change Impacting NZ

New Zealand is seeing impacts of excess greenhouse gas emissions in our climate and oceans, according to the latest national report from the Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ about the state of the atmosphere and climate. More>>

ALSO:

Wellington.Scoop: Arrests At Blockade Of "Weapons Expo"

“We encourage people in Wellington to get down to the Westpac Stadium now for a day of awesome peace action. There will be plenty of food, music and activities to keep us sustained through the day.” More>>

ALSO:

Rorschach Restructuring: Inland Revenue Steps Back From Psychometrics

The Public Service Association will be seeing Inland Revenue in Employment Court over its intention to psychometrically test employees reapplying for their roles at the department as part of its controversial Business Transformation restructuring plan. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election