Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | Video | Questions Of the Day | Search


Dunne: Third Reading Electoral Finance Bill

Media statement

For immediate release

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

Hon Peter Dunne, Speech Notes, Third Reading Electoral Finance Bill, 18


UnitedFuture supported the development and introduction of the Electoral Finance Bill because we believed it was important to tidy up the excesses of the last election to ensure that New Zealand continued to have a fair and open electoral system into the future.

We still do - that is why we worked in the select committee and elsewhere to improve the legislation to remove its most obnoxious features, which we believe has been achieved, and why we have continued to support the Bill through the Second Reading and Committee of the Whole stage, despite our very deep concerns about the partisan way in which it has been developed.

We would have strongly preferred there to have been genuinely multiparty involvement in the development of this legislation, given that there was, at least initially, a measure of common ground apparent on some of the issues it was likely to cover.

Over recent weeks, partly but not solely in response to a well orchestrated campaign, it has become clear that many New Zealanders have deep unease about the Bill and its provisions as they perceive them.

Many hundreds of people have contacted me through letters, emails, our party website and other sources to let me know what they think about this legislation.

Contrary to what some may think I have read personally every single communication.

While some of those messages have contained the usual measures of abuse and partisanship, that I have properly disregarded, and others have been plainly misinformed, many have also come from people within my electorate and around the country whose views I genuinely respect.

In particular, I have been struck by the messages from individuals with no special political axe to grind who genuinely fear that this Bill will limit their rights to freedom of speech and expression.

I am not talking about lobby organisations who have a vested interest to pursue, but the average citizen who feels affronted by what they consider to be an attack on the essential freedoms they enjoy as a New Zealander.

Various efforts by me and others to persuade them that this is not the case have not succeeded, and it is pointless continuing to attempt to do so.

All of which brings me to the Bill itself.

No matter what it says, or how well it has been crafted, or what official interpretations are placed upon it, in the court of public opinion it is held to be a self-serving attack on the freedom of our electoral process.

That perception has become the new reality, whatever we in this House may think of it.

So the dilemma we as a party and I as an individual legislator face is this: should we continue to put in place legislation that we know is failing the test of public credibility, and the answer we have come to is that we should not.

During the life of a Parliament there are likely to be many pieces of legislation passed that are unpopular, and this Bill could just be another one of those.

There will be those who say Members of Parliament need to be able to withstand the public pressure on these matters in the wider interest of doing what is right.

We are elected here to lead our country, not blow aimlessly like straws in the wind, they will argue.

And that is so, and that is why UnitedFuture works constructively and co-operatively with the Labour-led Government through its confidence and supply agreement to achieve policies we believe are in the best interests of our country, and why we remain committed to doing so for at least the balance of this Parliamentary term.

However, this Bill is not just another piece of unpopular legislation.

Because of its nature and content, it goes beyond that.

There comes an occasional time when a blind adherence to leading the country gives way to what some might see as a form of arrogance, and where the perception of being a straw in the wind is outweighed by the necessity of being seen to listen to the people.

This Bill has become one of those occasions.

The blunt truth is New Zealanders have gone beyond caring about its content - they simply mistrust it.

I acknowledge the rich ironies here.

Many of the same people were properly appalled at the antics of the last election, and would be horrified if our election process ever became subverted by big money.

They do want to know just who is pulling the party strings.

But their mistrust has developed because, those views notwithstanding, they do not see this Bill so much as a genuine attempt to resolve those problems, as a case of political utu.

Legislation perceived in that way cannot succeed.

A more robust and transparent process of independent review of all aspects of election funding, including the provisions of this Bill and such vexed issues as state funding of political parties and a fixed election date, is a far better way to proceed.

UnitedFuture has listened carefully to the views and feelings of New Zealanders and consequently, we have come to the conclusion that we can no longer support the passage of the Electoral Finance Bill.


© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

PM's Press Conference: Pike Re-Entry Agency

At today's post-cabinet press conference Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was joined by Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little to announce plans for the new agency for re-entry of the mine.

The Pike River Recovery Agency, Te Kahui Whakamana Rua Tekau ma Iwa, will be officially established on 31 January 2018 and will work with the Pike River families with the intention of manned entry of the drift before March 2019. More>>


Foreign Affairs: Patrick Gower Interviews Jacinda Ardern

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says discussions have already begun on how to bring climate change refugees into New Zealand under a Pacific seasonal employment plan... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Centre Right’s Love Of ‘Nanny State’

You’d almost think it was 2005 again. That was a time when the rugged individualists of the centre-right were being beset by government regulations on the nature of light-bulbs, the size of shower heads, the junk food available at school tuck shops and other such essentials... More>>

Speaking Of Transport: Public Engagement On Wellington Scenarios

“Our work on possible solutions for Wellington’s transport future is ongoing, but has progressed to the stage where we’re ready to share our ideas with the public and seek their feedback to help guide our next steps...” More>>


Parental Leave: National's Time-Sharing Change Fails

National has proposed a change to the Parental Leave and Employment Protection Amendment Bill that would allow both parents to take paid parental leave at the same time, if that is what suits them best. More>>


Train Free Thursday: Workers Strike To Defend Terms Of Employment

"They signed up to these conditions a year ago when they got the contract for Wellington's rail services. Now they're trying to increase profits by squeezing frontline workers." More>>


Seclusion: Ombudsman Emphasises Importance Of Monitoring

Disability Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says that while there have been changes to the Education (Update) Amendment Act 2017 to prohibit the use of seclusion, the report is an important reminder of the importance of regular monitoring of schools. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election